PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files

Europaudvalget 2000-01
EUU Alm.del Bilag 1371
Offentligt

Modtaget via elektronisk post. Der tages forbehold for evt. fejl

Europaudvalget

(Alm. del - bilag 1371)

Det Europæiske Råd

(Offentligt)

_____________________________________________

UPN, FT del - bilag FT 200 (Løbenr. 22187)

URU, Alm. del - bilag 482 (Løbenr. 22188)

Medlemmerne af Folketingets Europaudvalg og deres

stedfortrædere

Bilag

Journalnummer

400.C.2-0

Kontor

EU-sekr.

13. juni 2001

Til underretning for Folketingets Europaudvalg vedlægges i forbindelse med Det Europæiske Råd i

Göteborg den 15.-16. juni 2001 Rådets rapport vedrørende implementering af EU’s fælles strategi for

Rusland, 9805/01.

Den danske version af rapporten fremsendes, så snart den måtte foreligge.

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN

UNION

NIS 44 COEST 17 PESC 226

REPORT

from :

on :

to :

Subject :

Brussels, 12 June 2001

9805/01 LIMITE

COUNCIL

11 June 2001

EUROPEAN COUNCIL, Göteborg, 15/16 June 2001

Relations with Russia: - Council Report to the European Council on the

Implementation of the Common Strategy of the European Union on

Russia

1. In adopting in June 1999 the Common Strategy on Russia, the European Council requested the

Council to review and evaluate the Union's action under the Common Strategy, and to report to the

European Council on progress towards its objectives not less than annually.

2. On 11 June 2001, the Council approved this report on the Implementation of the Common Strategy

of the European Union on Russia and invited the European Council to take note of it.

PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files

____________

ANNEX

Council report to the European Council

on the Implementation of the

Common Strategy of the European Union on Russia

1. Introduction

In adopting in June 1999 the Common Strategy on Russia, the European Council requested the Council to

review and evaluate the Union’s action under the Common Strategy, and to report to the European Council

on progress towards its objectives not less than annually. The present report is the second review and

evaluation of actions implemented through the work plans of the French and Swedish Presidencies on

implementation of the Common Strategy.

Since the last report to the European Council, the dialogue and co-operation between the European Union

and Russia have been strengthened in most areas covered by the Common Strategy. The Union’s efforts

have been guided by the strategic goals as defined by the Common Strategy:

• a stable, open and pluralistic democracy in Russia, governed by the rule of law and underpinning a

prosperous market economy benefitting alike all the people of Russia and of the European Union,

• maintaining European stability, promoting global security and responding to the common challenges

of the continent through intensified co-operation with Russia.

Implementation of the provisions of the Common Strategy has further been guided by an aim to make

appropriate use of all relevant instruments and means available to the Union, the Community and the

Member States as well as to achieve better coherence of the Union's activities in relation to Russia,

including in international fora. In some areas, a multi-presidency approach has been applied to improve the

long-term consistency of Union policies.

2. Review and evaluation

Consolidation of democracy, the rule of law and public institutions in Russia

(1)

(2)The consolidation of democracy, the rule of law and public institutions in Russia remains a priority for

the European Union in relations with Russia. A genuine EU-Russia partnership must rest on a solid basis

of shared values such as respect for the principles of democracy, human rights, rule of law and market

economy. The EU has continued to follow closely developments in Russia in this field during the past

year. Repeatedly , the EU has found reason to express serious concern, mainly over the situation in

Chechnya and recently as regards the state of civil society, including the future of independent media in

Russia.

PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files

(3)

(4)In addition to making full use of the dialogue with Russia, a number of activities and programmes are

under way, both at national and European level, to strengthen democracy, the rule of law and civil society

in Russia. These include the Tacis 2000 Core Action Programme which has a specific objective to support

civil society development in Russia. Assessments made by i. a. the EU Head of Misssions in Moscow of

the state of democracy, rule of law and civil society in Russia clearly indi cate that further efforts by the

EU should be made in this direction. Such efforts should include appropriate support to strengthen

independent media in Russia, notably on local and regional level, as well as NGOs active in the field of

human rights and fundamental freedoms.

Continued legal reform in Russia is of crucial importance. During the past year, efforts have been made to

promote higher efficiency and better co-ordination of EU support in this field. A long-term approach has

been introduced to assist Russia in its endeavour to reinforce and reform its legal institutions. Specific

measures and needs identified include i. a. continued support to the Russian Academy of Justice, further

elaborated twinning programmes between legal institutions, including courts and prosecutors, in the EU

and Russia as well as better co-ordination of Union activities within, and in co-operation with, relevant

regional and international organisations, notably the Council of Europe.

Integration of Russia into a common European economic and social space

During the past year, efforts have continued, both on national and European level, to promote the further

integration of Russia into a common economic and social space in Europe. An intensified and constructive

dialogue has been achieved with Russia on i. a. the need for further economic and social reform in Russia,

legislative co-operation and the harmonisation of technical standards as well as for continued efforts by

Russia to adapt to the membership requirements of the WTO.

Important opportunities for discussion of these and other topics concerning reform and economic co-

operation have been the EU-Russia Summits in Paris in October 2000 and in Moscow in May 2001, the

meeting between EU Heads of State and Government and the President of the Russian Federation in

Stockholm 23 March, the High-level round-table in Moscow 30 March 2001 on the WTO and Russia’s

integration into the global economy and the meeting between the EU Ministers of Finance Troika and

nisters of Finance and Economy of the Russian Federation in Moscow 11 May, marking the resumption of

the high-level economic dialogue. At the EU-Russia Summit 2001 in Moscow, it was agreed to establish a

joint high-level group within the framework of the Partnership and Co-operation Agreement to elaborate

the concept of a common European economic space.

This intensive dialogue on economic reforms and co-operation has revealed an emerging convergence of

views at a political level, which needs to be translated into a more detailed exchange on experts' level on

key issues such as approximation of legislation, the investment climate in Russia and certain bilateral trade

irritants.

At the EU-Russia Summit 2000 in Paris, a dialogue on energy co-operation was launched, with the view to

lead to a strategic partnership between the EU and Russia in the energy field. Interim working groups have

been set up to further elaborate the possibilities and conditions for co-operation and have presented their

preliminary findings. A final, joint report will be submitted shortly, to be considered by the EU-Russia

Summit in Brussels later this year.

In addition to the dialogue on Government level between the EU and Russia, European business has

continued to provide useful contributions to the development of EU-Russia economic co-operation and a

dialogue between trade unions in Europe and Russia has been launched. To promote interaction on social

sector reform in Russia, a conference was held in St Petersburg 21-23 May 2001, with participation of both

European and Russian experts.

PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files

Despite an intensive dialogue, including within the framework of the Partnership and Co-operation

Agreement, a number of obstacles for trade and investment still remain, which will have to be removed in

order for economic co-operation to develop. Lowered trade barriers as well as improvements in the

business and investment climate in Russia are among the required measures. The EU continues to support

Russian reform efforts in this direction, both through Community and Member States progra mmes. The

EU has also continued to press for solutions to long-standing trade disputes between the Union and Russia,

although so far with varied results. An agreement was reached however at the EU-Russia Summit 2001 in

Moscow to resume the dialogue on aviation matters, which will include consultations on the issue of

Trans-Siberian over-flights. At the Summit, the EU and Russia also agreed that new procedures should be

put into place to enhance the dispute mechanism of the Partnership and Co-operation Agree ment. The

Summit further agreed on the need for simplification of customs procedures at border crossings to promote

the development of trade relations. Negotiations of a new fisheries agreement will soon be launched and

negotiations on a pharmaceutical agreement will be accelerated.

In the field of science and technology, an agreement on scientific and technological co-operation between

the EU and Russia was signed in November 2000 and entered into force in May 2001. The agreement

provides a good basis for further integration of Russia into European science and technology co-operation.

B.Co-operation to strengthen stability and security in Europe and beyond

Russia remains an essential partner of the European Union in strengthening stability and security in

Europe. The political dialogue between the EU and Russia is characterised by open, frank and constructive

discussions at all levels, covering most issues of common interest and concern, including regional

questions such as i.a. Southern Caucasus, as well as the situation in Belarus and Moldova. These

discussions provide a solid basis for co-operation, including in areas of strong EU intere st, and should be

further developed.

Important steps have been taken to further strengthen dialogue and co-operation in the security policy field.

At the EU-Russia Summit 2000 in Paris, a joint declaration was adopted on strengthening dialogue and co-

operation on political and security matters in Europe. The implementation of the decisions of the European

Council from December 2000 provides for a framework for structured dialogue and opens for possible

Russian participation in future EU-led crisis management operations under agreed conditions. At the

Summit 2001 in Moscow, the EU and Russia agreed to make full use of these existing formats for dialogue

and to focus on substantive issues of common concern. The EU will inform Russia on developments in

ESDP matters and Russia will inform the EU on the development of its security and defence policy and its

implementation within the fora for political dialogue. The Summit also concluded that co-operation in the

field of security policy, including on the work of the EU on military a nd civilian crisis management,

should continue to evolve gradually and in a structured way. Crisis management in Europe as well as UN

and OSCE matters, were identified as important areas of co-operation. Furthermore it was agreed that, as

the EU is improving its capacity for conflict prevention, the dialogue in this field will also be strengthened.

Dialogue and interaction between the EU and Russia have also intensified in the fields of non-proliferation,

disarmament and arms control. The Joint Action establishing a co-operation programme for non-

proliferation and disarmament in Russia - the first Joint Action adopted under the Common Strategy - has

continued to be a useful tool and a catalyst for concrete and concerted efforts, notably on chemical

weapons’ destruction and preparations for disposition of weapons grade plutoniu isions are being prepared

to expand efforts under the Joint Action to new project sites, including the Shchuchye chemical weapons

destruction site.

Common challenges on the European continent

Common challenges of the European Union and Russia include promotion of a clean environment,

measures to ensure nuclear safety and safe handling of nuclear waste, co-operation on Justice and Home

PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files

Affairs as well as regional and cross-border co-operation. In all these areas, dialogue and co-operation

have continued to evolve during the past year. Views largely seem to coincide on the nature of the

challenges facing the EU and Russia and the need for concerted action to meet these challenge s. But there

is still a lack of concrete, joint efforts in some areas, partly because of the daunting tasks at hand but also

due to differences in priorities. Further EU efforts and support will be needed, including to encourage

Russia to make budgetary and other priorities so as to ensure concrete results, notably in the field of

environment and nuclear safety. In other areas, such as Justice and Home Affairs, regional and cross-

border co-operation etc, the EU and Russia have a joint responsibility to tran slate words into deeds.

In the field of environment, a joint work programme was adopted at the EU-Russia Co-operation

Committee meeting in October 2000. The European Council in Stockholm 23-24 March 2001 agreed that

lending from the European Investment Bank should be opened up for selected environmental projects in

Russia, according to specific criteria decided by the Council. At the Summit 2001 in Moscow, the EU and

Russia repeated their strong mutual interest in deepening co-operation in the field of environme nt, i.a. in

the Baltic Sea Region and including financing of specific projects.

In the field of nuclear safety, the EU has made full use of its political weight to finalise negotiations on a

Multilateral Nuclear Environmental Programme in the Russian Federation (MNEPR). During the past

months considerable progress has been made and a final agreement is now within reach. At the Summit

2001 in Moscow, the EU and Russia agreed to instruct their respective negotiators with a view to bringing

about the signature of the MNEPR before the end of June 2001.

A.On Justice and Home Affairs, dialogue and co-operation has been strengthened at all levels. A

significant step to develop co-operation in this area has been taken by launching a dialogue at Ministerial

level on Justice and Home Affairs between the EU Troika and Russia, with the first meeting in Stockholm

6 April. Implementation of the joint action plan on fight against organised crime has continued, with

specific priority being given to combating trafficking in human beings, drugs and stolen vehicles. The EU

and Russia have also agreed to intensify efforts to combat corruption and money laundering.

C.On regional and cross-border co-operation, efforts have been made to intensify interaction with Russia,

notably within the framework of the Northern Dimension, including in preparation of the 2

Foreign

Ministers’ Conference on the Northern Dimension in Luxembourg 9 April.

E.While recognizing that the primary responsibility for the future development of the Kaliningrad lies with

Russia, the region does pose a specific challenge for EU-Russia co-operation, including the need for a

regional approach and enhanced cross-border efforts. During the first half of 2001, a dialogue has been

launched, within the framework of the Partnership and Co-operation Agreement, on Kaliningrad. The

dialogue will focus i. a. on possible consequences of EU enlargement for the Kal iningrad region and how

practical arrangements could be worked out, while respecting the Community acquis, to handle these

consequences. The dialogue will also focus on how the Kaliningrad region could take advantage of the

opportunities of enlargement.

3. Co-ordination

Through considerable efforts by Member States, the Council Secretariat and the Commission, the Union

has at its disposal a number of inventories on EU activities in relation to Russia. The full potential of these

inventories, for the purpose of achieving greater complementarity of assistance and optimal use of the

Union's resources, has yet to be utilised. Efforts should therefore continue in this direction, including with

a view to improve transparency of EU-Russia relations in g eneral and to improve the access of

PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files

information for the public on the EU:s activities in relation to Russia, to the benefit of citizens in Europe

and Russia alike. Possible measures could include to consider linking together existing databases on

Member States' and Community activities in relation to Russia or to explore the possibility to create a joint

database on EU activities.

4. Conclusions

Two years after the adoption of the Common Strategy, and two years before the expiration of its initial

term of application, some general conclusions could be made on the impact of the Common Strategy on the

European Union's policy towards Russia. Covering a large number of areas and thus being all-

encompassing in nature, the Common Strategy has proved to be an important instrument for guiding the

European Union in relations with Russia. The Common Strategy's provision that each incoming Presidency

should present a work plan for implementation of the Common Strategy has been of particular importance

in this respect.

In the General Affairs Council conclusions in February 2001, the Council welcomed the report of the

Secretary General/High Representative on how to improve the overall effectiveness of Common Strategies

and agreed guideline to further develop the potential of existing and future Common Strategies. Added

value, clearly identified issues and specific, well defined, and verifiable policy objectives should guide the

future work on the Common Strategies, making full use of all relevant instru ments and procedures

established by the Treaty.

As regards the Common Strategy on Russia, it could be further developed in order to achieve better

focusing of the Union's combined instruments and means (including through the use of Joint Actions and

Common Positions), the resources of Member States and the Community as well as a more long-term

approach in fields of strong interest to the EU and Russia, i.e. by seeking multi-presidency agreements on

priorities and objectives.

Under the Common Strategy, the European Union has now achieved an intensive and concentrated

dialogue with Russia, covering most areas of shared EU-Russia interest. On the basis of this dialogue,

concrete and constructive co-operation has evolved in a number of fields. However, there is still a notable

discrepancy between the ambitions expressed in the dialogue and the actual results achieved. The EU and

Russia share a responsibility to improve the track-record of EU-Russia co-operation, not least within the

framework of the Partnership and Co-operation Agreement.

While the EU remains fully committed to the policy objectives of the Common Strategy, some aspects of

developments in Russia continue to give rise to serious concern. This is primarily related to the Russian

authorities' handling of the human rights and humanitarian situation in Chechnya, but also a worrying trend

towards a weakening of independent media in Russia.

The EU’s response to these developments has been to continue to make efforts to integrate Russia into

European co-operation based on shared values and to strive for a consistent implementation of the Union's

policy objectives in relations with Russia, while making full use of a strengthened dialogue, including in

appropriate international fora, to deliver a clear, unambiguous message on issues that concern the basic

principles on which EU-Russia co-operation and partnership must res sidering the situation in Russia, as

well as the EU's own interests, the arguments are compelling in favour of continuing this "dual-track"

policy also in the foreseeable future.