PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files

Europaudvalget 2001-02 (2. samling)
EUU Alm.del Bilag 380
Offentligt

Modtaget via elektronisk post. Der tages forbehold for evt. fejl

Europaudvalget (2. samling)

(Alm. del - bilag 380)

Det Europæiske Råd

(Offentligt)

_____________________________________________

ERU, Alm. del - bilag 155 (Løbenr. 6194)

Medlemmerne af Folketingets Europaudvalg

og deres stedfortrædere

Bilag

Journalnummer

400.C.2-0

Kontor

EU-sekr.

26. februar 2002

Til underretning for Folketingets Europaudvalg vedlægges i forbindelse med Det Europæiske Råd i Barcelona

den 15.-16. marts 2002 Kommissionens meddelelse vedrørende Lissabon-strategien.

Bilag forefindes ikke i elektronisk form.

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES

Brussels, 15.1.2002

COM(2002) 14 final

COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION

to the Spring European Council in Barcelona

PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files

THE LISBON STRATEGY — MAKING CHANGE HAPPEN

Executive Summary

It is now almost two years since the Lisbon European Council set the

bold and ambitious ten-year goal

of making the

Union the most dynamic, competitive, sustainable knowledge-based economy, enjoying full employment and

strengthened economic and social cohesion.

Since then, the European Council has made its Spring meetings the focal point for economic, social and environmental

policy issues, in the light of the overall objective of ensuring sustainable development. The European Council in

Barcelona will therefore review progress made and agree the key priority areas for attention over the coming year. This

report seeks to set the agenda for this meeting.

Progress to date is encouraging…..

ng meetings the focal point for economic, social and environmental policy issues, in the light of the overall

objective of ensuring sustainable development. The European Council in Barcelona will therefore review progress

made and agree the key priority areas for attention over the coming year. This report seeks to set the agenda for

this meeting.

The

initial phase of defining policy objectives and drafting policy reforms is coming to a close.

Many of them still

have to be formally adopted and, once adopted, it may still take some time before their effects are felt.

There have already been

notable policy successes

such as new rules for telecommunication markets; co-operation in

areas such as education, pension reforms and research and new programmes to tackle inequality and social exclusion.

The successful

changeover to the euro

has shown the European Union’s capacity to deliver. The euro has reinforced

basically sound economic fundamentals. The current

downturn

has interrupted the steady fall in unemployment and is

slowing the creation of new jobs.

…but some key proposals are stalled

hown the European Union’s capacity to deliver. The euro has reinforced basically sound economic fundamentals.

The current downturn has interrupted the steady fall in unemployment and is slowing the creation of new jobs.

There have also been

disappointments

– areas such as the Community Patent, financial services, energy and the Galileo

satellite system, where deadlines for agreement set by the European Council have been missed and progress has not

always been fast enough. The European Parliament and Council must now act to close this "delivery

gap"

if credibility

is not to suffer.

The roadmap must be pursued on all fronts…

reas such as the Community Patent, financial services, energy and the Galileo satellite system, where deadlines

for agreement set by the European Council have been missed and progress has not always been fast enough. The

European Parliament and Council must now act to close this "delivery gap" if credibility is not to suffer.

The European Union must stand by the agreed policy of macro-economic stability and maintain the momentum behind

the whole of the Lisbon strategy. The Lisbon objectives reinforce each other and only an integrated approach will

guarantee that they can be met. This means:

• Closing the delivery gap on structural and economic reforms and ensuring that sustainable development is an

integral part of these reforms.

• Continuing to foster economic and social cohesion and taking the necessary steps now to ensure safe and

sustainable pensions for the future.

• Developing entrepreneurship within a competitive business environment

…but

some areas need priority action

e business environment

To achieve the targets for the end of the decade, the European Union must push up its potential for growth.

PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files

In the current conditions, there are

three priority areas

where the European Council in Barcelona should

give a decisive impulse to action; areas which can help to speed up the Union’s recovery and which are

important for its long-term needs:

• The further development of employment policies, with a particular focus on active labour market reforms.

This means looking at tax and benefits systems, rewarding people who work longer and improving childcare.

Barriers, in areas such as skills and languages, which discourage people moving to different jobs within their

companies, or in other sectors or countries will be tackled. Steps by the social partners to anticipate and manage

change should be encouraged. This will help t he European Union to move closer, even in the current climate, to

its goal of full employment and better jobs.

• Connecting Europe and connecting markets. This can be done through further

reforms and completing missing

links in key network industries

and accelerating

financial market integration

by delivering the right regulatory

framework. This means, for example, setting dates for opening energy markets and agreeing key remaining

financial services measures, but the Union must move ahead, at the same time, with investment in priority

infrastructure projects which will make the in ternal market more dynamic and more competitive. Recent telecoms

reforms must spur the roll out of fast broadband telecoms network. A more interconnected Europe, as well as

efficient and well functioning services of general economic interest, will keep the European Union on its growth

path and help to provide higher quality services to everyone throughout the Union.

• Increasing

investment in knowledge

to ensure future competitiveness and jobs. The European Union must step up

the effort in the areas of research, innovation, education and training, and increase its impact by pursuing a more

integrated approach and place these policies under a common banner: a European area of knowledge. New

networks of excellence will be set up and the European dimension of lifelong learning could be backed up by

European level qualifications. Action will foc us as well on getting business to spend significantly more on

research and innovation.

By sending a signal of confidence and exercising political leadership, the Barcelona meeting will give new

impetus to the Lisbon strategy and to economic policy co-ordination. Moreover, in doing so, it will reinforce

economic governance, which will help to shape a strong economy and society and will also support the euro.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Executive Summary

1 POLITICAL AND ECONOMIC CONTEXT

2 PROGRESS TOWARDS THE LISBON GOALS

3 POLICY RESPONSE

3.1 Maintaining the momentum

3.2 Sharpening the focus in 2002

3.3 Beyond Barcelona

The report is supported by a Commission Staff Working Paper analysising developments and policy progress since the

Lisbon European Council.

1 POLITICAL AND ECONOMIC CONTEXT

The European Council will meet in Barcelona just a few weeks after the euro has become a tangible reality in people’s

hands.

The euro is a powerful symbol of European integration. It shows what the European Union can achieve when the

political will is there.

PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files

The same ambition must now be applied to economic, social and environmental policy if the EU is to meet the strategic

goal for this decade: to become the most competitive and dynamic knowledge-based economy in the world as decided in

Lisbon European Council two years ago.

By making its annual Spring meeting the focal point for the overall economic, social and environmental strategy of the

European Union, the European Council has committed itself to providing leadership at the highest political level. The

forthcoming meeting in Barcelona will put that leadership to the test.

There is every prospect of success. Economic and Monetary Union has delivered macro-economic stability and current

conditions, even in the present downturn, remain basically sound. This reflects the role played by the European Union’s

Stability and Growth Pact.

This provides a setting for the action on employment, research and innovation, economic reforms, social cohesion and

the environment set out in the Lisbon strategy; actions which reinforce each other to create a more dynamic and

competitive internal market and addresses short- and long-term challenges for society as a whole.

Since its launch by the Lisbon European Council the strategy has been strengthened in two respects. The Nice European

Council launched the Social Policy Agenda which sets out the measures to achieve the Lisbon objectives of more and

better jobs and a modern welfare state within a more inclusive society. The principal lines of the Lisbon strategy were

completed in Göteborg, where the European Council added an environmental dimension and confirmed, with the

European Union’s Susta Development Strategy, the need to ensure the consistency of the different policy strands with

long-term objectives.

The short-term economic outlook for the Barcelona European Council

At first sight, economic and political conditions could hardly be more different from those prevailing in March 2000, or

even at the time of last year’s Spring Council meeting.

The economic slowdown in the United States, exacerbated by the uncertainty following the terrorist attacks on the

United States and the subsequent political and military situation, is a major political challenge for the Union. It has also

had serious direct and indirect economic and social consequences.

◦ Business and consumer confidence, already fragile, has weakened further.

◦ Growth forecasts for the European Union for 2001 and 2002 have been sharply cut back.

◦ Business investment has slowed considerably as firms of all sizes in the European Union have waited to see

the direction in which the economy is heading.

◦ The four-year fall in unemployment has been interrupted and job creation looks set to slow considerably.

Nevertheless, there are grounds for cautious optimism that the current downturn will be short-lived.

European financial markets have absorbed the shock well – greatly aided by the arrival of the euro. The

downturn reflects a largely cyclical change in the global economy, which has been compounded by an

unprecedented set of political and economic events.

Current conditions do not call into question basically sound economic fundamentals or the need to pursue

the Lisbon strategy. Structural reforms are a major part of the long-term solution. Moreover, falling inflation

has allowed short-term interest rates to fall by 1.5 percentage points within the euro area (mirrored by cuts in

Denmark, Sweden and the United Kingdom) over the last year. These have yet to work their way through

into the economy and there may be scope for further reductions as inflation continues to decline.

Unless the broader political situation worsens, a moderate pick-up is foreseen for the first half of this year,

as confidence, consumer spending and investment start to return. Growth is likely to gain momentum in the

second half of the year as export markets outside the European Union start to recover.

As recent experience has shown, developments outside the European Union can have a major impact here.

This reinforces the case for structural reforms that make the Union less vulnerable to external shocks, be

they political or economic. But it also highlights the importance of engaging fully in efforts to reform and

reshape the international landscape, and to play an active role in relation to the current trade round launched

in Doha.

PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files

The Barcelona European Council will be a critical moment for the Lisbon strategy

In Barcelona, the European Council will assess the progress that has been made. It should consolidate

successes, highlight weaknesses and set priorities for the next twelve to eighteen months.

It will do this at an important moment for the Lisbon strategy:

◦ The Commission has by now tabled most of the main policy proposals.

◦ The second phase of agreeing and adopting those policies is well underway. Success or failure is largely in

the hands of the European Parliament or Council, who must take decisions in key areas of the strategy.

◦ The final phase, where agreed policies are implemented and start to have an impact on the ground, has

barely begun.

But transforming new policies into visible results, as this report shows, needs actions from all the parties

involved.

There have already been important successes - such as the recently agreed Telecoms Package – which have

resulted from the close co-operation between the Commission, the European Parliament and the Council.

But in some other crucial areas of economic and structural reforms progress has been slow or disappointing.

The European Council must overcome this "delivery gap" before it grows any wider. It must send a signal of

confidence and give a clear political impulse in those areas where the need for progress is most urgent. The

Lisbon strategy set a comprehensive agenda and progress must be made on all fronts, even if not all

elements can or should be given the same attention by the Spring European Council each year.

2 PROGRESS TOWARDS THE LISBON GOALS

The reform calendar set out below shows the most significant measures launched at Lisbon and the extent to

which associated target dates have been met.

The Lisbon Reform Calendar :

Indications of the year in which Lisbon reforms are planned to take effect

( indicates necessary measures adopted/taken;

indicates that the target date risks being missed because of insufficient progress in Council and the

European Parliament).

2001

Local loop unbundling

State aid scoreboard

and

Strategy for

simplifying the regulatory environment

(Some

delay)

2002

New framework for

public procurement *

(2001 deadline for agreement missed)

New framework for

electronic commerce

(except VAT treatment of e-commerce

where 2001 deadline for agreement missed)

First two year

National Action Plans against exclusion and poverty

Social Policy Scoreboard

2003

New framework for

telecommunications

Single market for risk capital *

Further opening of electricity markets for business customers *

Sixth Framework Programme for research

Community Patent*

(2001 deadline for agreement missed)

Liberalisation of

international rail freight using trans-European rail networks

2004 Single European Sky

PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files

Further

opening of gas market for business customers *

Energy tax

framework *

Framework for the

taxation of savings

2005 Single market for all financial services *

Opening of

gas and electricity markets for residential customers

Start of a mandatory European

emission trading scheme for CO

2006

Second stage of opening of market for

postal services

2008

Liberalisation of

all international rail freight

Galileo satellite navigation system

enters into operation *

(

2001 deadline for agreeing structure missed)

2009

Possible new or final stage of opening of markets for

postal services

(subject to study in

2006 on the impact of liberalisation)

A separate Staff Paper supporting this report provides a more complete assessment of the progress and lists

the actions implementing the Lisbon strategy. A fuller description of those actions which are part of the

Social Policy Agenda will be provided in a separate Social Policy Scoreboard to be published before

Barcelona.

The table below illustrates that for the European Union to become the

"most competitive and knowledge-

based economy in the world …",

much remains to be done in moving towards key Lisbon targets, but that in

most cases some Member States are already leading the way.

ard to be published before Barcelona.

The "Best Performance Indicators" used in that table represent the unweighted average of three best

performing Member States. They are useful in providing an indication of what can and should be achieved

over time, although they only serve to measure progress towards EU-wide targets and do not set binding

targets for individual Member States.

Table 2 : Progress towards certain Lisbon goals and indicators of best performance

Lisbon (data

available )

Barcelona

(Latest data)

EU Best

Performance

Indicator *

2010

Target

General

background

economic

65.1

2.6

74.0

65.1

1.6

72.2

96.0

4.9

106.0

GDP per capita in 1995 PPS,

US=100

(99/01)

b. Growth rate of GDP at constant prices

1995 (99/01)

c. Productivity per employee in PPS

US=100 (99/01)

2. Employment

a. Overall (% of active population) 99/01

63.2

63.9

73.6 **

(2005)

b. Women

99/01

c. Older workers (55-64)

99/01

52.8

37.2

54.7

38.3

69.0

66.0

(2005)

3. R&D

a. Total (public and private) R&D

expenditure as % GDP

1.87

1.90

3.1

Years 98 / 00

b. Share of total R&D expenditure

financed by industry (%).

55.1

55.9

68.1

Years 98 / 99 (Source:

OECD/Eurostat)

4. Education and training

PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files

a. Public spending on education as % GDP

Years 99, 00

b. Early school leavers (% not in further

education)

5.0

18.7

5.1

17.7

6.7

7.2

9.4

Years 99, 01

c. Lifelong learning (% participation of

adults)

8.2

8.3

21.4

Years 99, 01

5. Internet Penetration

a. EU homes (% homes)

Years 00 / 01

b. EU broadband (% homes, cable/ADSL

access)

18.4

2.5

37.7

5.8

60.6

14.9

Year 01

c. EU schools (% all schools)

Year 01

6. Public Procurement

a. Value of tenders published in EU Official

Journal (% of GDP)

100

by end

2001

1.8

2.4

3.9

Years 98 / 00

7. Venture Capital

a. Early stage (% of GDP)

Years 99 / 01

b. Expansion (% of GDP)

0.038

0.104

0.036

0.099

0.079

0.192

Years 99 / 01

8. State Aid

a. Aid as % GDP

Years 95-97 / 97-99

9. Social Cohesion

a. Risk of poverty (after social transfers)

1.1

0.9

0.5

Year 97/98

Source of data is Eurostat unless otherwise indicated. The full data series is periodically updated on-line http://europa.eu.int/comm/eurostat. * Unweighted

average of the three best performing EU Member States ** 2001 Best Practice estimate based on 2000 figures for DK, NL, and 2001 figure for UK.

Assessment of progress in the two years since Lisbon

The main messages from the assessment of progress towards the European Union’s strategic goal are

summarised below. Achieving the Lisbon objectives requires a sustained EU growth rate of 3%. Given the

slowdown that the European Union is going through, it is all the more important to be successful in

implementing the reforms leading to a continued rise in the employment rate and higher labour productivity.

Since Lisbon the gap in GDP per capita between the European Union and the US has remained unchanged.

According to the latest data, GDP per capita in the Union was equivalent to 64% of that of the US. The

difference in labour productivity per hour explains around one third of this gap. The other two thirds are due

to the smaller number of yearly working hours per worker and the lower employment rate in the Union.

Progress across the whole of the Lisbon strategy is needed if this gap is to be narrowed substantially.

(a) Employment

Progress towards the goal of full employment is distorted by the current conditions. These have interrupted

the sustained period of falling unemployment and job creation.

The creation of more and better jobs by business across the European Union will depend on how rapidly the

European Union’s economy emerges from the slowdown. Nevertheless, employment, and particularly,

labour market polices are helping to increase the number of people with a job. The European Employment

Strategy has helped to drive those reforms and their continuation should be a priority, drawing on the

exchange of best practice within the Union. Given the current climate steps by the social partners ticipate

and manage changes within different sectors and companies should be encouraged.

PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files

The High Level Task Force on skills and mobility has underlined the need to remove barriers to

geographical mobility and to ensure people have relevant and adaptable skills which will help them move

between different occupations. This should be backed up by a transparent and integrated labour market

information system. At the same time, it is clear from the structural indicators related to education (lifelong

learning, early school leavers) that little progress has been made across the European Union in tur ning

lifelong learning into a daily reality for most adults.

The Council and the European Parliament have continued work on a number of legislative proposals in

fields including health and safety at the workplace, the involvement of workers and equal treatment between

women and men. New debates have been launched on issues such as the quality in work and corporate

responsibility.

(b) Research and innovation

Momentum has built up behind the European Research Area. This is helped by the agreement last December

on the main lines of the sixth Research Framework Programme. Positive trends have continued, particularly

in science and research in relation to the growth in the numbers of patents in relation to the population or the

number of science graduates in the Union. The Union is particularly strong in academic and fundamental

research, but European researchers and businesses do not capitalise sufficiently on the ir expertise in frontier

technologies, such as biotechnology and the life sciences and other clean, environmental technologies.

Changes in the business environment are also important here, but so is accelerating measures to support

financial market integration and improving the supply of venture capital once the cyclical contraction seen

in 2001 is reversed, as well as getting early agreement on the Community Patent.

Not enough progress has been made to strengthen the European Union’s underlying knowledge base. The

level of investment in education is still too low, the take up of lifelong learning limited and too many young

people still leave school with no or only basic qualifications.

There has been significant progress in some areas of the internal market and economic reforms, particularly

linked to creating the regulatory framework for electronic commerce and communications sectors. The role

of the

eEurope

2002 action plan has been important. Substantial progress was made on connecting schools

to the Internet. The internal market has brought clear benefits in terms of competition, greater choice and

lower prices in important areas such as telecommunications and energy markets.&# 9;

At the same time, all Member States have been taking steps to improve the business environment, making it

easier for companies to innovate and grow and encouraging risk-taking and innovation. Efforts to simplify

the regulatory environment identified in Lisbon and in the European Charter for Small Businesses must

continue.

However, as pointed out in the report on the functioning of product and capital markets, further efforts are

needed to improve the performance of the internal market. Price convergence seems to be slowing down in

recent years. Moreover, progress on structural and economic reform has not been uniform. Some Member

States must still make substantial efforts to meet the target from the Stockholm European Council of having

98.5% of adopted EC legislation implemented at a national level by March 2002.

A large part of the 1500 infringement cases underway against the Member States for not correctly applying

internal market law relate to barriers to cross-border service provision, even though service markets are one

of the areas to which the Lisbon European Council attached particular importance. Unfortunately, little

progress has been made on moving forward with the Commission’s plans for integrating the service sector.

Some of the most important structural reforms - including some where agreement wa ired by the end of last

year – covering electricity, gas, the Galileo satellite navigation system, financial services markets, and

procurement markets have not been delivered. They have seen only limited progress, yet the deadlines were

set by the Heads of State and Governments.

(d) Cohesion

The European Social Policy Agenda has given new impetus and provided a new policy framework to deliver

the Lisbon goals of improved cohesion.

PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files

In the mid 1990s around 18% of the population or 60 million people were

at risk of poverty and there were significant variations across (and within) Member States. Without social

transfers this rate would have been 26%. Similar variations were seen in the distribution of incomes between

the richest and poorest households. The role of welfare systems has been a significant factor in protecting

people from the risk of poverty.

The lack of up to date figures means that it is difficult to assess the impact of the period of stronger growth

and falling unemployment in the second half of the decade. At a European and national level since Lisbon

concrete measures to fight poverty, discrimination and social exclusion have been agreed, supported by new

action programmes . Member States have delivered their first two year National Action Plans against

exclusion and poverty. This work has drawn on the exchange of best practice and the deve lopment of

agreed indicators. It has involved not only the Member States, but the social partners and civil society .

However, time is needed to allow the effects of these actions to be felt in the year ahead. The statistical basis

for measuring both economic and social cohesion must be strengthened.

At the same time, work on the impact of an ageing population on pensions and welfare systems continues to

highlight what is at stake and the need for work in that area to continue.

Differences in performance, as measured in GDP per capita, between Member States remain important and

are often as acute within Member States as between them. However, although disparities between the

Member States persist, they have considerably narrowed since 1998, notably in the cohesion countries

(Greece, Ireland, Portugal and Spain) where the initial gap has reduced by one third. However, differences

between regions in unemployment levels remain pronounced with rates averaging more than 20% in the

wors t affected regions.

(e) The environment

Important policy action has been taken in the seven months since the launch of the European Union’s

Sustainable Development Strategy at the Göteborg European Council. In Barcelona, the impulse given to

transport and energy policies must take due account of the environment. Available data suggests that while

greenhouse gas emissions have decreased during the 1990s, meeting the agreed targets for reducing

emissions and the Göteborg objective of decoupling GDP and transport growth remains a ver nding

challenge. Further steps will be required, particularly as traffic has been growing in line with or faster than

GDP, especially for air travel and road freight. The Bonn and Marrakech Conferences have, nevertheless,

provided a framework for tackling climate change.

The adoption of the actions proposed in last year’s White Paper on transport policy will help to move

forward the process of developing a sustainable approach to transport.

Clean technologies are also set to play an important role. They can help to tackle environmental challenges,

but also to improve the performance of the whole economy. The Commission’s forthcoming report on the

effects of environmental ("clean") technologies on growth and employment shows that realising their full

potential means overcoming current barriers. These result from price incentives, but also for example, from

a lack of awareness of the cost savings that can result from reducing pol .

3 POLICY RESPONSE

3.1 Maintaining the momentum

The European Union must stand by the agreed policy of macro-economic stability, maintain the momentum

behind the whole of the Lisbon strategy, and focus on areas which can make the biggest contribution.

3.1.1 A firm commitment to the Stability and Growth Pact will help build confidence

The macro-economic policy framework offers stability that should speed up the Union’s return to stronger

growth:

◦ Current macro-economic policies within the Stability and Growth Pact can help to meet short-term needs in

the economy without compromising the medium-term goal of stability;

PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files

◦ The easing of monetary conditions associated with diminished risks to price stability has helped to adjust the

macro-economic policy mix;

◦ Budgetary policies are also helping to stabilise the economy. Sizeable tax cuts in 2001 (amounting to 0.5%

of GDP) have been implemented in some Member States;

◦ Automatic budgetary stabilisers within the Stability and Growth Pact are at work. As a result of business

cycle effects, budget balances are expected to deteriorate.

Member States that still have deficits should aim at their elimination by 2003-4 while letting automatic

budget stabilisers work within the overall limit for budget deficits of 3% of GDP. If progress on budgetary

consolidation is not made in 2002, then a bigger effort will be needed in the two subsequent years.

Against this background, the current slowdown shows that the European Union economy remains vulnerable

to economic and political developments in other parts of the world. Implementing the reforms within the

Lisbon strategy would contribute to reducing the impact of future shocks on the European Union.

• The

European Council

should give a firm commitment to the macro-economic stability and to further consolidation in public

finances over the medium term.

3.1.2 Maintaining momentum behind all of the Lisbon targets

In Barcelona, the European Council must ensure that the strategy moves forward on all fronts — economic,

social and environmental. They are mutually reinforcing and only an integrated approach will guarantee that

the European Union can meet the target of high growth and full employment and remain on the path of

sustainable development. The following should be highlighted:

(a) Closing the delivery gap on economic and structural reforms

A "delivery gap" exists. Deadlines for decisions and their implementation are being missed, often in the face

of short-term sectoral or political interests.

This represents a real problem with real costs for business and citizens across the European Union.

President Romano Prodi highlighted this gap in his letters to Heads of State and Government in November

and to the President of the European Parliament. Those letters identified the issues where progress must be

seen before Barcelona.

The Members of the European Council must assume responsibility for leadership over their respective

governments. They should ensure that their ministers resolve disputes over the detail of individual

proposals, rather than accept that missed deadlines are simply replaced by new ones or that they are called

upon to sort out the detail of complex proposals. The European Parliament must assume its share of the

responsibility for ensuring that the delivery gap is overcome.

The

European Council

should address this challenge by considering options to bridge the delivery gap in this area:

◦ Additional Council meetings could be organised by the Council Presidency in the run up to Spring European

Councils to resolve outstanding issues.

◦ The Council Presidency should make full use of qualified majority voting, where available, to ensure

decisions on Lisbon reforms are not held up, particularly in the areas set out in this Report.

◦ Heads of State and Government should ensure appropriate internal co-ordination so that progress on the

whole strategy is achieved.

Where blockages cannot be overcome the real importance and urgency attached to the proposals is called

into question. In such cases the Commission will consider withdrawing the proposal it has made. Where the

lack of progress, for example for gas and electricity, is harming competition and holding back market

integration, the Commission – as it did in the 1990s for telecommunications – will consider adopting

legislation to open markets using its powers under the Europea n rules.

PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files

(b) Ensuring that sustainable development is an integral part of these reforms

Sustainable development means ensuring that policies are consistent with long-term objectives. Economic,

social and environmental objectives all affect the quality of life. This is why an environmental dimension

has been integrated into the Lisbon strategy. It should ensure that each of these three elements is given

appropriate weight when the direction of policy is set at the highest political level.

This means that the overall impact and coherence of policies must be assessed against overall long-term

objectives. The Commission as currently developing mechanisms for assessing the sustainability impact of

its proposals, and these will be up and running before the end of this year.

Improving policy coherence will be especially important over the next twelve to eighteen months in the

areas of transport and energy.

For example, although further opening of transport and energy markets will lower costs and lead to lower

prices, it must not remove the incentives for individuals and businesses to invest in clean technologies and

energy efficiency. This requires the removal of environmentally damaging subsidies and the appropriate use

of environmental taxes. In addition, regulators should ensure appropriate market access for renewable

sources of energy.

The

European Parliament and Council:

◦ should adopt the energy tax directive by December 2002.

The

Commission

will bring forward in 2002:

◦ new proposals on transport infrastructure pricing to ensure that the prices for using different modes of

transport better reflect their costs to society. The revenue raised could be an additional source of support for

closing the missing links within Trans-European Networks, particularly for alternatives to road transport;

◦ new proposals on safer transport systems across Europe, and

◦ will, in parallel with continuing negotiations on the energy tax directive, review the overall approach to

energy taxation and investigate options to move forward on getting energy prices to better reflect their

overall cost to society.

Policies and new infrastructures, including Trans-European Networks, must be compatible with sustainable

development. The Commission will bring forward proposals seeking to increase efficiency and ensure the

security of energy sources following the consultation on the November 2000 Green Paper.

Improved economic and social cohesion results from the combination of stronger economic performance, the delivery of

a knowledge-based society and long-term structural support of investment in infrastructures and people, notably in the

least developed regions. It builds on the strength and ambition of the European social model and the welfare state. That

model is helping people back to work, recognising that a job is often the best protection against social exclusion. It

combines a n affordable system offering a high level of social protection with a focus on social cohesion which is often

felt to be lacking in the United States.

This objective is particularly important in less wealthy regions and for disadvantaged groups within society, for whom

cohesion is not just the by-product of successful integration; it is a sign of solidarity. It implies a sustained effort in terms

of investment into the medium to long-term, which will become even more necessary in the context of an enlarged

European Union.

The

European Council

should:

◦ set a target for 2010 of halving the number of people at risk of poverty across the European Union. Member States

should indicate in their two year National Action Plans against poverty and social exclusion how they will contribute to

its achievement. Work should build on the social inclusion indicators endorsed by the European Council in Laeken;

◦ endorse ongoing work on the impact of ageing on healthcare and care for the elderly in order to strengthen co-

operation and exchange of good practice.

PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files

(d) Ensuring safe and sustainable pensions

The old-age dependency ratio – the relationship between the working population and those beyond the retirement age -

will more than double from the current 24% to 49% by 2050. Projections of future expenditure on pensions show big

increases of between 3 and 5 percentage points of GDP in most countries, and even more in some countries. Increases of

such magnitudes give serious cause for concern both for pension systems and public finances.

The

European Council

should call for the continuation of on-going reforms of pension systems in most Member States aiming to:

◦ safeguard the capacity of pension systems to meet their social aims;

◦ ensure the financial sustainability of pension systems;

◦ enhance their ability to respond to a changing society.

(e) Developing entrepreneurship within a favourable business environmentand encouraging effective

competition

A sound economy, a better skilled and more mobile workforce, integrated energy, transport and financial markets, and a

stronger knowledge and technology base within the European Union all represent opportunities.

Converting those opportunities into economic growth and jobs depends on business and the creative spirit of

entrepreneurs across the European Union, as well as on a competitive environment undistorted by private or state

measures. The vigour of their response that will be a key factor for success. Small businesses, in particular, are the

backbone of the European economy. They play a pivotal role in innovation and job-creation.

Entrepreneurship will flourish in a favourable business environment. This requires progress on many fronts, which

together are bringing about significant changes.

The Member States committed themselves at the Stockholm European Council to reduce state aid and redirect aid

towards horizontal objectives. Even though they have made some progress in reducing aid levels, they should continue

their sustained effort and not allow changes in the economic climate to become an excuse for retrograde steps.

The

European Council

should endorse on-going action to :

◦ reduce State aid in relation to GDP and redirect aid towards horizontal objectives of common interest, including

cohesion objectives

◦ finalise by June 2002 an action plan for improving and simplifying the regulatory environment;

◦ develop quantitative targets in the area of enterprise, small businesses and the business environment, for example,

on reducing the time it takes to register a company or on the availability of e-government services on line. This will

help to focus attention on the areas where progress is most needed and show when it has been achieved. Flexibility

will be needed allowing Member States to use, within a jointly agreed set of targets, those which best respond to their

specific priorities ;

◦ reinforce action along all ten lines of the European Charter for Small Businesses (endorsed by the European Council

in Feira in June 2000);

◦ improve the tax environment for businesses across the European Union by tackling barriers to cross-border economic

activity.

The

European Commission

will:

◦ propose targeted action in the short-term, for example, amendments to the existing merger and parent-subsidiaries

directives to cover the tax field. It will investigate medium-term, comprehensive solutions, such as possibilities for

companies to work with a single set of corporate tax rules, which provides a consolidated common tax base for their

EU-wide activities.

3.2 Sharpening the focus in 2002

The European Council in Barcelona should focus greatest attention on three priority areas for the year ahead:

◦ Employment policies, particularly active labour market policies,

in order to reduce unemployment and improve employment prospects for the whole workforce, but

particularly to raise the employment rates of women and older workers.

◦ Economic reforms

PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files

to strengthen competition, integration and investment within the European Union’s network industries and

an acceleration of work to achieve integrated financial markets.

◦ A stronger knowledge base in the European Union

These are areas which can make the biggest difference to the European Union’s long-term performance.

They will help to stimulate employment, investment and productivity in the short to medium term - not only

in specific sectors but also across the whole economy.

Wherever appropriate, the Commission will ensure that its proposals for Guidelines on Broad Economic

Policy and on Employment translate these priorities into operational measures to be taken up at European

and national level.

3.2.1 Developing employment policies focusing on active labour market policies for

European labour markets

The employment rate targets of the European Union for 2005 and 2010 must be maintained and efforts must

be accelerated to create more and better jobs and get more people to work. Measures should be favoured

which will help particular groups, such as women and older workers, to enter and remain in the workforce.

• The

European Commission

will in 2002 present a proposal for the revision of the European Employment Strategy to build

on its achievements and to integrate the Lisbon objectives and targets, including the timing of the Luxembourg process.

• Member States

should indicate from 2003 onwards how they will contribute to achieving these European Union targets, by setting ambitious,

but achievable national targets within their National Action Plans for employment. This should be reflected in the

Employment Guidelines for 2003.

Progress is possible if action is taken by all relevant partners, but especially from Member States and the

social partners. Action should focus on:

(a) Removing obstacles and disincentives deterring people from taking up and remaining in a

job

(i) Tax

Member States have already lowered taxes - from 1999 to 2001 – by approximately ¾ of a percentage point

of GDP. This trend should be continued in order to obtain a further reduction by 2005 in the order of one

percentage point. Such reductions will have to respect fully the Stability and Growth Pact and should, in

general, be compensated by reductions in public spending.

◦ The

European Council

should underline that, where Member States pursue further tax cuts, they should give priority

to cuts in favour of low-wage earners.

(ii) Benefits

Comprehensive reforms, addressing the combined effect of tax and benefits in creating incentives for people

to take up and remain in the workforce is an urgent priority for many Member States.

While such reforms should address control systems and eligibility rules for benefits, they must focus on

improving incentives which make work pay while ensuring that the social objectives of welfare systems are

not undermined.

The

European Council

should underline the importance of speeding up key benefit reforms at a national level, taking

account of the combined effects of tax and benefits.

Member States

should pursue steps which:

◦ discourage early retirement for individuals and the introduction of early retirement schemes by companies.

This will help to increase labour force participation and the employment rate of older workers and should

contribute to an increase in the effective average retirement age presently around 58 to 60 in 2010. Efforts

should be more pronounced in Member States with lower employment rates for older workers;

PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files

◦ promote a gradual transition from work to retirement (e.g. encourage part-time work) and reward those

remaining at work longer;

◦ address reforms of means-tested benefits, without jeopardising the social objectives or undermining

incentives for education and training, with the aim of ensuring that each member of a household has an

incentive to work.

The Commission will look further at how the combination of different policies impact the level of labour

market participation (such as incentive systems, penalties for work in alternative employment after

retirement).

The social partners should be encouraged to support a more gradual exit from the labour force for older

workers. Members States can help through changes in regulations, for example, concerning certain benefit

schemes (such as those related to health care).

(iii) Improving childcare facilities and investigating the causes of current gender gaps in the

workplace

To increase the participation of women in the workforce, the provision of both public and private child-care

facilities should be improved. Establishing targets, which will draw on future childcare indicators, will help

to build momentum for further improvements. The lack of childcare is just one example of factors which

influence the participation of women in the workforce and which contribute to the existence of a gender gap.

The

European Council

should set EU wide targets for 2010:

◦ Childcare should be available to at least 90% of children between 3 years old and the mandatory school age

and to at least 33% of children under 3 years of age.

The

Commission

will launch an overall assessment in 2002 on the reasons why differences leading to a

gender gap, including in pay levels, exist.

(b) Promoting employability, adaptability and mobility to manage change better

(i) An Action Plan on skills and mobility

The work of the High Level Task Force on skills and mobility has highlighted important barriers to greater

occupational and geographical mobility within the European Union. These barriers can result from a lack of

key skills, the need for a more uniform, transparent and flexible regime for professional recognition and

other problems associated with qualifications, the lack of information about work opportunities in other

Member States and obstacles linked to pensions, access to hea lthcare and social security.

The

Commission

will shortly bring forward an Action Plan seeking to remove the barriers within European labour

markets by 2005. The action plan will propose steps to:

◦ make education systems more responsive to the needs of the labour market;

◦ lower regulatory and administrative barriers to professional recognition as well as other barriers resulting

from the way formal qualifications and non-formal learning are recognised;

◦ ensure the full transferability of social security rights, including for pensions, across the European Union.

This should include a very practical and symbolic step to replace the current paper forms needed for health

treatment in another Member State with a European Health Insurance Card. Such a card would seek to

simplify procedures, rather than to change existing rights and obligations;

◦ analyse the interaction between immigration, employment and social policies.

Member States

should take action to improve mobility within their territories.

◦ This requires a targeted effort combining active labour market policies with a strengthening of the

administration of benefit systems and more flexibility in the portability of benefits across regions. It also

requires that wages take greater account of productivity and of labour market situations in different sectors

and geographical areas.

PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files

(ii) Anticipating and managing change in the context of corporate restructuring

To address employment and the social aspects of corporate restructuring, a dialogue between social partners

at all levels is important. It will contribute to a more preventive and proactive approach; an approach which

anticipates changes as well as seeking to manage them.

The Commission is launching the first phase in the consultation of the social partners on anticipating and

managing change. This will address the social aspects of corporate restructuring. The Commission expects

the social partners to develop commonly agreed approaches based on best practices.

◦ The

European Council

should endorse the need for a positive approach to change in the face of the need for greater

adaptability within the economy and call on the social partners to pursue work in this area.

3.2.2 Connecting Europe, connecting markets

The European Union has evolved over half a century into a network of interdependence and integration.

Decisions implementing key structural economic reforms launched at Lisbon must be taken in 2002. Work

on creating the regulatory framework needed to achieve integrated financial markets must be accelerated to

reduce the cost of capital, create jobs and to enable citizens and businesses to reap the full benefits of the

euro. A timetable and framework for further integration of g as and electricity markets and for key areas of

transport must be set out by the European Parliament and Council. Missing links in Europe’s key

infrastructure network must be filled in and investment in basic infrastructures encouraged.

(a) Financial markets

Progress has been made towards the Lisbon targets of fully integrated securities markets by 2003 and financial services

markets by 2005, but it has not been fast enough. This is crucial to growth, competitiveness, jobs and enterprise within

the European Union. Remaining administrative and legal barriers must be removed. The UCITS Directives on

harmonised investment funds and the Regulation on cross-border payments have already been formally adopted.

Decisions are needed on the othe r key elements of the Financial Services Action Plan if the Union is to deliver an

integrated financial services sector on time as promised by the Lisbon and Stockholm European Councils.

The

European Parliament and Council

should

◦ adopt by June 2002 pending proposals on distance marketing of financial services, collateral, market abuse, and

international accounting standards.

◦ adopt by December 2002 pending proposals on pension funds, financial conglomerates and prospectuses

The High Level Expert Group on Company Law, set up by the European Commission, has delivered its first

report on issues related to takeover bids. Taking into account its recommendations, the Commission will

bring forward a new proposal in the second quarter of this year. It would like full political agreement on this

crucial issue by the end of 2002.

(b) Energy and transport

Final decisions are needed before the end of 2002 on steps to further integrate energy and transport markets

within the European Union. Further market opening will help to improve services for businesses and

citizens, while ensuring an adequate level of service everywhere in the European Union at an affordable

price.

(i) Market opening.

The

European Parliament and Council

should:

◦ adopt as early as possible in 2002 pending proposals setting the dates and framework for the final stage of

the liberalisation of electricity and gas markets;

PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files

◦ adopt by December 2002 proposals creating the Single European Sky, proposed rules on airport slot

allocation, as well as pending proposals on access to port services and public service contracts;

◦ make substantial progress on the forthcoming second package of measures intended to revitalise European

railways with a view to its adoption in 2003.

The

Council

must, in the light of the conclusions of the Laeken European Council:

◦ take the necessary decisions by March 2002 to start officially the development stage of the Galileo satellite

navigation system.

(ii) Missing links

Market opening must be accompanied by efforts to improve the use of existing networks and to complete

missing energy and transport links within the European Union. This will strengthen the internal market and

underpin effective competition. In the case of energy, it will help to improve access to national grids for

renewable sources of energy and enhance the long-term security of EU energy supplies.

Following from its Communication on European energy networks in December 2001, the European

Commission believes that improving the degree of interconnection between national energy grids is

essential.

◦ The

European Parliament and Council

should adopt by December 2002 the revision of the Guidelines and

accompanying financial rules on Trans-European energy and transport networks.

◦ Member States

should achieve by 2005 a target of a level of electricity interconnection equivalent to at least 10% of their installed

generation capacity.

Rapid agreement on the TEN guidelines should permit a better use of structural and cohesion funds together

with the TEN budget to ensure the necessary investment. This is particularly important for the further

deployment of rail links to shift traffic from the roads as well as for the cohesion countries.

(c ) Broadband networks

Realising the full potential of a knowledge-driven society means that citizens and businesses must be able to

access affordable, high-speed communications wherever they are in the European Union. Broadband

internet access will be a key factor for improving the performance of the economy. Broadband networks will

form the backbone of an increasingly interconnected and integrated society.

Broadband roll out is currently not occurring at a fast enough pace, reflecting the large investments

concerned. Decisions on such networks is a matter for the market to decide. Yet, public authorities can

promote competition, in particular in the local loop and ensure a level playing field through the application

of the recently agreed new rules for telecommunications. They can also help to stimulate the market as a

purchaser of new applications and services which need broadband capacity , and by putting government

services on-line.

◦ The

European Council

should establish as a target the widespread availability of broadband technologies throughout

the European Union by 2005.

Promoting the roll out of broadband networks is only part of what is needed. It is essential that full use is

made – starting in schools - of the possibilities offered by high speed links. This highlights the importance

of on-going actions to spread IT skills throughout the population within the framework of eLearning and

lifelong learning initiatives. There is also an urgent need in schools for more computers, better quality

Internet connections, and better training of their ers as regards new technologies.

◦ The

European Council

should endorse new targets for eLearning in European Union schools. Efforts should continue

to meet the existing targets and new ones should include the objective of ensuring by the end of 2002 that the ratio of

Internet connected PCs to pupils is brought down across the European Union to one for every fifteen pupils.

3.2.3 Investing in knowledge for future competitiveness and employment

PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files

Europe is at the cutting edge of many areas of science, it has the proven capacity to turn ideas into

innovative products and services, and its education systems are generally strong.

At the same time, the European higher education and research system fails to attract enough people and

investment, both from within Europe and world-wide. Funding for research and education is still not

sufficient, particularly from business sources in the case of research.

Moreover, lifelong learning is, despite progress in some Member States, still not a reality for most people.

As many as 150 million Europeans have not completed their secondary education; relatively few adults

participate in life long learning (varying from one in one hundred to one in five).

(a) A European Knowledge Area

The European Union must increase investment in human resources, develop the European Area of Research

and Innovation, transform education and training systems within a lifelong learning perspective, create

networks and centres of excellence in research and education, and foster European mobility.

Some progress has been made at both Community and national level to adapt policies to these challenges,

but a stronger European impulse is needed. A more integrated approach should also help to ensure that the

business in the European Union remains competitive and that people with the right skills are there to fill new

research and development jobs as investment increases.

• The

European Parliament and Council

should adopt the sixth Research Framework Programme by June 2002.

• The

European Commission

will in 2002 propose an integrated strategy for Community education and research policies. It

will be based on an integrated approach towards the education and research aspects of training and career development,

university issues, the development of European knowledge and science networks, and reinforced co-operation and

exchanges with third countries

This integrated strategy will include actions to:

◦ Develop a transparent and open European environment for research and education

. The practical and legal conditions required to ensure genuine mobility for all those involved in education,

research and innovation should be put in place. This will also draw on the Skills and Mobility Action Plan.

◦

Create European networks and centres of excellence in research and

education.

The new sixth Research Framework Programme will provide funding for the creation of major

networks of excellence in research. The Commission will also complete the mapping of excellence in

research in selected areas, with the help of Member States, and extend the process to enlargement countries.

Consistency will be ensured with education aspects, for which specific actions will be proposed in the

integrated strategy.

◦ Enhance the European dimension of lifelong learning.

The right of free movement will be helped by a coherent approach to the recognition of qualifications and

competences based on greater comparability of qualifications and on mutual trust. This should be helped by

developing European masters, certificates and diplomas, minimum quality standards in education and

training, peer review and co-operation between qualification authorities in the European Union.

◦

Create the conditions for more investment in research from private sources

. The Commission will support the exchange of good practice and experience in this area; use the sixth

Research Framework Programme to support important projects in which business participates; and step up

the complementary use of Framework Programme and European Investment Bank funding following the

agreement between the Commission and EIB.

Improvements in the level of private sector spending on R&D must go hand in hand with continued high

levels of public funding for research in priority areas.

The actions envisaged make it both realistic and opportune to set targets for research spending in 2010 that

will close the gap with Europe’s main partners and help the European Union to achieve the objectives set in

Lisbon.

PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files

The

European Council

should endorse action to:

◦ strengthen the European area of research and innovation by setting a target of 3% of GDP for the overall level of

public and private spending on research and development by the end of the decade. Within that total, the amount

funded by business should rise to around two thirds against 55% today.

(b) Frontier technologies

At Stockholm the European Council recognised that frontier technologies, such as life sciences and biotechnology

alongside other clean, environmental technologies, are a key factor for future growth in an area where Europe’s

knowledge base, though behind the US, is well-developed.

(i) An Action Plan for life sciences and biotechnology

Although positive developments are underway, the European Union suffers from its late entry into the life sciences area.

It is also constrained by a lack of people with the necessary skills and insufficient incentive from intellectual property

rules. There is also insufficient coherence in the overall regulatory and policy framework.

The European Union must actively develop policies which are forward-looking, take a global view and which drive

growth and employment opportunities in the medium-term. If it fails to do so, it is likely to be confronted by policies

shaped by others, at home and abroad.

◦ The

European Council

should endorse the importance of this sector and provide strategic orientations for future

work.

◦ The

Commission

will shortly present a comprehensive strategy to address the specific obstacles and opportunities

for life sciences and biotechnology. The areas addressed will include competitiveness and innovation, research, the

regulatory environment, the international context, the involvement of the public, and ethical issues.

◦ The strategy will set out an action plan proposing concrete measures and will invite other public and private actors to

participate in the process. The European Council should endorse the importance of this sector and provide strategic

orientations for further work.

(ii) Clean technologies

The development and wider take up of clean technologies will also be important for stimulating growth and

employment. They were signalled as a key frontier technology by the Stockholm European Council.

Realising their full potential means overcoming current market barriers to investing in them and creating a

favourable business environment.

The sixth Research Framework Programme should also play a role in supporting the development and

uptake in an area where European companies already play a leading role.

• The

European Commission,

following the forthcoming report on environmental technologies, will develop an action plan for

tackling obstacles to their take up.

3.3 Beyond Barcelona

3.3.1 Ensuring and enhancing co-ordination

The growing interdependence of the economies of the Member States adopting the euro, but also of those

that are not participating, calls for enhanced and effective economic policy co-ordination. This must ensure

further convergence of the European Union’s economies and a smooth functioning of the internal market.

The Treaty and the Stability and Growth Pact provide a framework for such co-ordination. It is based on

consensus and involves a common assessment of the economic situation, agreement on appropriate

economic policy responses, and peer review leading, where necessary, to adjustment of particular policies.

The European Council should endorse a strategy for enhancing economic policy co-ordination which should

consist of:

◦ The assessment of the economic situation and the policy mix increasingly from an euro area perspective,

supported by an upgrading of the European Union’s statistical base.

PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files

◦ Greater openness in building consensus on appropriate policies by ensuring it takes place within common

rules governing the conduct of economic policy.

◦ The provision of early information on major policy initiatives by a Member State to other Member States

and the Commission in order that they can benefit from the views of their partners through a process of peer

review.

Furthermore, the integration of the economic, social and environmental dimensions within the Lisbon

strategy makes it imperative to pay increased attention to the consistency of the policies pursued in these

fields. This implies a better co-ordination and synchronisation of the key policy instruments used to steer its

different elements, particularly:

◦ the Broad Economic Policy Guidelines, which the Commission proposes shortly after the Spring European

Council;

◦ the Employment Guidelines currently presented by the Commission each Autumn, and

◦ the "Cardiff Report" on economic reform presented by the Commission at the end of each year,

They should be organised in a way which allows the Spring European Council to provide the most effective

guidance and political impetus on economic, social and environmental questions.

3.3.2 Enlargement

The Lisbon strategy provides an additional way for candidate countries to adopt and implement key

economic, social and environmental objectives, but it is not an additional condition for entry. The eEurope

Plus initiative launched by candidate countries at the Göteborg European Council is a good example of this.

They have put in place a framework to speed up their transition to a knowledge economy. The Commission

believes it could be helpful if other similar initiatives were d eveloped across the candidate countries.

However, the process of enlargement also presents challenges for the strategy itself just as it does for

economic and social cohesion. It will certainly be a further factor for growth, investment and job creation

across the Union in the second half of the decade, but it will also put many of the quantitative Lisbon targets

under strain.

It will involve a two-way learning process; a process which has already started with the participation of

candidate countries in all Community programmes. This is helping those countries, sometimes with the

support of pre-accession aid, to familiarise themselves with the objectives and way of working within the

Lisbon strategy.

Moreover, pre-accession funding may help them in adopting, implementing and enforcing those elements of

"acquis communautaire" which form part of the Lisbon strategy.