Europaudvalget 2008-09
EUU Alm.del Bilag 8
Offentligt
596821_0001.png
POSITION PAPER
July 2008
For further information contact:
Ottilia Thoreson
Fisheries Policy Officer
WWF Sweden
Ulriksdals Slott
170 81 Solna
Sweden
Tel: +46 8 624 74 00
Direct: +46 8 624 74 15
Fax: +46 8 85 13 29
E-mail:[email protected]
And
Ewa Milewska
Fisheries Officer
WWF Poland
Ul. Wiśniowa 38
02-520 Warszawa, Poland
Tel. +22 849 84 69
Fax +22 646 36 72
E-mail:[email protected]

WWF Position Paper
Page
1
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
596821_0002.png
Baltic Sea TACs and Quotas
There is a clear trend to how the Fisheries Council has repeatedly chosen to adopt TAC and quotas higher than
those recommended by scientists in order to incorporate the immediate socio-economic interests of the fishing
industry without any means of evaluating objectively how the catch levels will impact on the environment or the
fishing industry
1
. This has lead to the continued delay of the implementation of ecosystem-based fisheries
management – a key commitment made by the EU Member States under the reformed Common Fisheries
Policy adopted 2002.
In the advice for 2009, the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) state that there is a clear
ecosystem shift in the Baltic Sea where the physical and chemical factors of the environment and food web are
affecting fish growth and recruitment
2
. The average weight of prey fish has decreased from 25 grams to 10
grams in the last 30 years
3
. A large decrease of the cod population in the Baltic Sea has cascaded down the food
web influencing the whole open Baltic Sea ecosystem, from plankton eating fish to primary producers
4
. These
findings highlight the fact that effort should be made to prevent changes in the higher food web. Hence great
care must be taken to manage the Baltic stocks with precaution due to the present status with consideration to
the uncertainty future environmental change will cause to this ecosystem and its consequence to the fish stocks.
WWF urges the European Commission and the Council of Fisheries Ministers to set quotas according to ICES
advice and implement measures that will promote sustainable fishing practices through technical measures,
rapidly reducing overcapacity and cease all illegal fishing practices. Only by adopting such measures will the
chance to implement ecosystem based management of fisheries and thereby safeguard the resource the industry
is dependent on be realised.
Fleet Capacity
Overcapacity of around 30-40 percent still remains a major obstacle in achieving sustainability of the Baltic Sea
fisheries. Fleet capacity is not incorporated into the ICES annual advice. While recent national programmes to
reduce fleet size are underway, fishing capacity is still far in excess of that required to efficiently harvest fish
stocks sustainably and guarantee socio-economic stability for the fishing industry
5
. Member States must be
more efficient and swift in balancing the fleet size to match the resource available in line with the opportunities
offered by the operational programme for the period 2007-2013 of the European Fisheries Fund.
Illegal fishing (IUU) and Effective Control & Enforcement
For several years ICES and WWF have underlined the problem with IUU in the Baltic Sea. ICES conservatively
estimate IUU to range within 30-45%, while unofficial numbers range from 50% and onwards. In the past year,
efforts have been made to combat the problem such as the Baltic Sea Regional Advisory Council (BSRAC)
conference in March 2007 where all the relevant Member States and the Commission agreed on a declaration to
all take responsibility to improve control and enforcement in the Baltic Sea and the recent adoption of the IUU
Regulation by the Council of Fisheries Ministers. However, progress has been varied in the Member States and
illegal fishing is still occurring. Regional cooperation with cross border actions as recommended by the Court of
Audit Report
6
would increase the region’s MCS (Monitoring, Control and Surveillance) and help eliminate
potential loop holes where illegal fishing still occurs.
WWF position on Baltic TACs and Quotas
Following are WWF’s recommendations and priorities for the 2008 October Council for the main demersal,
pelagic and salmon fish stocks.
Court of Auditors, Special Report 7/2007, p 46, 111
http://www.ices.dk/committe/acom/comwork/report/2008/2008/8%201-8%202%20Baltic%20ecosystem%20overview.pdf
3
2007, Bengt Sjöstrand, Havet, Fiskbestånd I utsjön ur balans, p 94-96
4
Casini, M. et al (2007) Multi-level trophic cascades in a heavily exploited open marine ecosystem, Proc. R. Soc. B;
http://journals.royalsociety.org/content/200501qx31vp06r5/
5
COM (2007) 828 Final
6
Court of Auditors, Special Report 7/2007, p 51, 127
2
1

WWF Position Paper
Page
2
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
596821_0003.png
Cod stocks
Cod – subdivision 25-32
This year, ICES
7
will not be putting a zero catch advice for the eastern stock, but has advised that the long term
fishing yield target of 0.3 can be attained by applying the management plan EC 1098/2007 for year 2009, which
sets the fishing mortality at 0.25. Due to good recruitment of the 2003 and 2005 year classes the stock has been
able to increase its Spawning Stock Biomass (SSB). However ICES still underlines that the stock is at a
historical low level.
It is crucial to manage the stock wisely and give it a chance to reach a sustainable level that can benefit
both the environment and the industry in the long-term. The unforeseen increase in stock biomass in this
years ICES advice should not be regarded as a direct result of Member States fisheries management.
Against all odds, the Baltic Sea natural conditions have been favourable for cod recruitment, opening up
a golden chance to nurture the resource back into stable stock levels in the near future, given the
Fisheries Council restrict the TAC. WWF recommends that the TAC is set according to the objective of
attaining the long term fishing mortality target sooner than has been previously predicted by only
increasing the TAC by 15%, corresponding to 44 580 tonnes.
Cod – subdivision 22-24
ICES
8
considers the western stock to be at risk of reproductive capacity with the spawning stock being just
below the biomass precautionary reference level and the current fishing mortality exceeding the maximum
sustainable yield reference.
As long as ICES has not evaluated whether the management plan is consistent with the precautionary
approach, WWF supports ICES advice on setting the TAC according to the precautionary approach. The
set long term yield is to reach a fishing mortality rate no higher than 0.6, thus WWF recommends
reducing the fishing pressure by at least 28% to attain this set objective, corresponding to a TAC of
13 700 tonnes.
Technical measures concerning fishing effort system, derogations for small-scale fisheries and limited allowable
fishing days, which were adopted along with the management plan, will not result in direct improvements to the
two cod stocks as long as overcapacity is not reduced by 50% in the Member States in the region and
improvement in control and enforcement are made. Overcapacity reduction will not take effect just by altering
fishing effort. According to the Court of Auditors report, overcapacity jeopardises compliance with rules and
effectiveness of controls
9
.
Pelagic Fish Stocks
Herring in the Gulf of Riga
ICES
10
classify the stock as being harvested sustainably but overfished in terms of the maximum sustainable
yield. The fishing mortality has been above Fpa for the past 10 years, but fallen below the reference level in the
last two years. ICES recommend the fishing mortality for 2009 should be below 0.4 corresponding to landings
of less than 31 500 tonnes.
Herring in Sub-division 30 Bothnian Sea and Sub-division 31 Bothnian Bay
ICES
11,12
advice is the same as last year, to maintain the catch level to 2008, so the TAC should be less than
67 300 tonnes for the Bothnian Sea and 87 020 tonnes for the Bothnian Bay.
7
8
http://www.ices.dk/committe/acom/comwork/report/2008/2008/cod-2532.pdf
http://www.ices.dk/committe/acom/comwork/report/2008/2008/cod-2532.pdf
9
Special Report 7/2007, p 45, 107
10
http://www.ices.dk/committe/acom/comwork/report/2008/2008/Her-riga.pdf
11
http://www.ices.dk/committe/acom/comwork/report/2008/2008/Her-30.pdf
12
http://www.ices.dk/committe/acom/comwork/report/2008/2008/Her-31.pdf

WWF Position Paper
Page
3
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
596821_0004.png
Herring in Subdivision 25-29 and 32 (excl Gulf of Riga)
In the absence of defined biomass reference points, the state of the stock cannot be fully evaluated. Based on the
recent estimates of fishing mortality, ICES
13
classifies the stock as being harvested sustainably, and advice for a
TAC of less than 147 000 tonnes.
Herring in Subdivision 22-24 and Division IIIa
In the absence of defined reference points, the state of the stock cannot be fully evaluated. Recruitment has
declined since 2003 and is currently at the lowest observed level while fishing mortality is well above the range
that would lead to high long-term yields and low risk of stock depletion. ICES
14
advise that fishing mortality
should be reduced by 59% corresponding to a TAC of 18 400 tonnes.
With no management plan in place for the four different herring stocks, it is highly recommended that
the TAC for all herring stocks be set at the level recommended by ICES. Although misreporting has been
reduced since 2005, due to prohibition of landing unsorted catches, there still remains an inaccuracy in
catch data due to the mixed fishery with sprat. This in turn influences the assessment for the stocks.
Further efforts should be made to intensify the control and enforcement in order to minimise
misreporting in mixed pelagic fishery. Allowing official observers onboard on fishing trips would further
improve the catch data.
Sprat
ICES
15
classify this stock as at risk of being harvested unsustainably. The current fishing mortality is above that
expected level required to attain the high long-term yield of 0.40. ICES recommend landings of less than 291
000 tonnes, in line with the precautionary approach. Sprat is mainly caught in a mixed fishery with herring,
which causes the catch data to be imprecise in certain fishing areas and periods. Recruitment in the last 3 years
has fluctuated around the long term average. Regional differences in stock abundance have caused some nations
to not catch their allocated TAC.
WWF welcomes the development of a multi-annual plan for the pelagic species and suggests that
individual management plan be made for the specific stocks. The plan should include protective measures
such as closed areas, restriction of size/power of vessels for the pelagic species and improved control of all
pelagic fisheries. While waiting for the management plan to be adopted for the pelagic fisheries of the
Baltic region, WWF advocates for the TAC to be set according to the precautionary approach.
Salmon stocks
Salmon in the Main Basin subdivision 22-31:
The survival of post smolt has been low in recent years. Consequently there is a small number of feeding and
maturing populations. ICES
16
recommend maintaining the low catch and fishing effort for 2009.
Salmon Gulf of Finland subdivision 32:
ICES
17
advise no catch of wild salmon and fisheries should only be permitted at sites where there is virtually no
chance of taking wild salmon from the Gulf of Finland along with reared salmon. Poaching must also be
stopped in the rivers of this region.
Currently only 37 of 69 potential salmon rivers have wild smolt production
18
. The main objective of the
revised Salmon Action Plan (SAP) should be to establish individual management recovery plans to
primarily maintain the genetic diversity of salmon stocks for weak river populations. SAP must
incorporate set objectives to reduce obstacles hindering migration and fishing pressure along with
measures to eliminate poaching. In addition to open sea fisheries management, national regulations for
salmon fishing must be integrated into the plan and be consistent with the overall objectives.
13
14
http://www.ices.dk/committe/acom/comwork/report/2008/2008/Her-2532-Ex-Go.pdf
http://www.ices.dk/committe/acom/comwork/report/2008/2008/her-3a22.pdf
15
http://www.ices.dk/committe/acom/comwork/report/2008/2008/spr-2232.pdf
16
http://www.ices.dk/committe/acom/comwork/report/2008/2008/sal-2231.pdf
17
http://www.ices.dk/committe/acom/comwork/report/2008/2008/sal-32.pdf
18
http://www.helcom.fi/stc/files/Krakow2007/Biodiversity_MM2007.pdf

WWF Position Paper
Page
4