PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files

Udvalget for Udlændinge- og Integrationspolitik 2011-12
KOM (2011) 0560 Bilag 1
Offentligt

_____

ASSEMBLÉE NATIONALE

CONSTITUTION DU 4 OCTOBRE 1958

TREIZIÈME LÉGISLATURE

Enregistré à la Présidence de l’Assemblée nationale le 27 septembre 2011

PROPOSITION DE RÉSOLUTION

EUROPÉENNE

portant avis motivé sur la conformité au principe de subsidiarité,

la proposition de règlement du Parlement européen et du

Conseil modifiant le règlement (CE) n

562/2006 afin d’établir

des règles communes relatives à la réintroduction temporaire du

contrôle aux frontières intérieures dans des circonstances

exceptionnelles

(Renvoyée à la commission des lois constitutionnelles, de la législation et de

l’administration générale de la République, à défaut de constitution d'une commission

spéciale dans les délais prévus par les articles 30 et 31 du Règlement)

PRÉSENTÉE,

AU NOM DE LA COMMISSION DES AFFAIRES EUROPEENNES,

PAR

IDIER

QUENTIN,

Rapporteur,

PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files

–

Single article

The National Assembly,

In the light of Article 88-6 of the Constitution,

In the light of Rule 151-9 of the Rules of Procedure of the

National Assembly,

In the light of Article 5 of the Treaty on European Union,

In the light of protocol no. 2 on the application of the

principles of subsidiarity and proportionality appended to the

Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty on the Functioning

of the European Union,

In the light of Articles 72 and 77 of the Treaty on the

Functioning of the European Union,

In the light of Regulation no. 562/2006 of the European

Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 establishing a

Community Code on the rules governing the movement of

persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code),

In the light of the proposal for a regulation of the European

Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) no.

562/2006 in order to provide for common rules on the temporary

reintroduction of border control at internal borders in exceptional

circumstances (COM[2011]560 final/no. E 6612),

Taking into account the current balance in the sharing of

powers between the Member States and the European

Commission in the event of a temporary reintroduction of border

control at internal borders of the Schengen area, as laid down by

Articles 23 to 31 of Regulation (EC) no. 562/2006 of the

European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006

establishing a Community Code on the rules governing the

movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code);

PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files

–

Whereas the proposal for a regulation is designed to reform

the existing procedure for the reintroduction of internal border

control in the event of a serious threat to public policy or internal

security;

Whereas the proposal for a regulation aims at getting the

European Commission to take itself, in the event of a foreseeable

event, the decision to reintroduce internal border control, on the

basis in particular of information supplied by the State

concerned, whereas the decision is currently a matter for the

Member State, subject to

subsequent

control by the European

Commission;

Whereas this proposal lays down that, should an event occur

which requires immediate action, a Member State could

exceptionally take the decision to reintroduce control for a period

limited to five days, any extension requiring a decision by the

European Commission;

Whereas Member States, outside the proposed new specific

procedure for reintroduction on the grounds of persistent serious

deficiencies, are the best placed to assess threats to public policy

and internal security and take the consequently required

decisions, within the framework laid down by Regulation no.

562/2006;

Whereas the decision to reintroduce internal border control

cannot be communitarised in the manner laid down in the

proposal for a regulation without the subsidiarity principle being

jeopardised;

1. Observes and affirms therefore that the proposal for a

regulation does not comply with the subsidiarity principle;

2. Asks that the proposal for a regulation should

consequently be amended.