Europaudvalget 2016-17
EUU Alm.del Bilag 370
Offentligt
1720087_0001.png
Minutes of the Meeting of the Presidential Troika of COSAC
Valletta, Malta, 22 January 2017
PRESENT AT THE MEETING
CHAIRS Mr Luciano BUSUTTIL, Chair of the Foreign and European Affairs Committee, Maltese
Kamra tad-Deputati
Mr �½uboš BLAHA, Chair of the Committee on European Affairs, Slovak
Národná rada,
Mr Jaak
MADISON, Vice-Chair of the EU Affairs Committee of the Estonian
Riigikogu;
and Ms Danuta
HÜBNER, Chair of the Committee on Constitutional Affairs, European Parliament.
AGENDA
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Adoption of the agenda of the meeting of the Presidential Troika of COSAC
Approval of the draft programme of the meeting of the Chairpersons of COSAC
Debate on the draft programme for the LVII COSAC
Approval of the outline of the 27th Bi-annual Report of COSAC
Letters received by the Presidency
Any other business
PROCEEDINGS
1. Adoption of the agenda of the meeting of the Presidential Troika of COSAC
The Chair, Mr Luciano BUSUTTIL, Chair of the Foreign and European Affairs Committee of the
Maltese
Kamra tad-deputati,
welcomed the delegations of the Presidential Troika of COSAC
(hereinafter referred to as "the Troika"), especially the Estonian delegation participating for the first
time in a Troika meeting.
In the absence of any objection, the agenda of the meeting of the Troika was adopted without
amendment.
2. Approval of the draft programme of the meeting of the Chairpersons of COSAC
The Chair presented the draft programme of the meeting of the Chairpersons of COSAC. The first
session would focus on the Priorities of the Maltese Presidency of the Council of the European
Union, presented by the Deputy Prime Minister for European Affairs and Implementation of the
Electoral Manifesto, Mr Louis GRECH, and the Minister for Tourism, Mr Edward ZAMMIT
LEWIS. Following a discussion on procedural issues and miscellaneous matters, the second session
would see a discussion on the European Commission Work Programme 2017, with Mr Frans
TIMMERMANS, First Vice President of the European Commission, as keynote speaker, and Ms
Danuta HÜBNER, Chair of the Committee on Constitutional Affairs of the European Parliament,
and Mr Bastiaan VAN APELDOORN, Chair of the Committee on European Affairs of the Dutch
Eerste Kamer,
as the two other speakers.
The draft programme of the meeting of the Chairpersons of COSAC was approved without
amendment.
1
EUU, Alm.del - 2016-17 - Bilag 370: Referat fra Trojka-møde og COSAC-formandsmøde i Valletta 22-23/1-17
3. Debate on the draft programme for the LVII COSAC
The Chair briefly outlined the programme, informing colleagues that the first session would focus
on a reflection on Malta’s EU Presidency and would seek to analyse the progress and development
of the priorities of the Maltese Presidency. The second session would focus on the role of national
Parliaments in the EU, with the 27th Bi-annual Report of COSAC to be presented by the Permanent
Member of the COSAC Secretariat. The third session would address the outcome of the UK
Referendum, while the fourth session would address the topic of an integrated EU maritime policy.
The fifth session, on the second day, would be wholly dedicated to migration-combatting human
smuggling and trafficking and establishing a humane and effective return and readmission policy.
Ms HÜBNER interjected to appeal for the inclusion of a speaker from the European Parliament on
migration; the suggestion was welcomed by the Presidency. Mr BLAHA welcomed the agenda, and
Mr MADISON noted that maritime affairs were important also for Estonia.
4. Approval of the outline of the 27th Bi-annual Report of COSAC
The Chair expressed the Presidency’s intention to make use of the Bi-annual Report’s content as
much as possible in the LVII COSAC’s discussions. He then briefly presented the outline of the
27th Bi-annual Report of COSAC. The first chapter aimed to obtain an updated overview of the
procedures used by national Parliaments to scrutinise their government during the EU legislative
process; the second chapter sought to analyse the impact of current challenges on the debate on the
future of the EU within national Parliaments; the third chapter focussed on human smuggling and
trafficking and on how to establish a humane and effective return and readmission policy. He
announced that the questionnaire for the 27th Bi-annual Report would be sent by 14 February 2017
and that the deadline for replies was set for 15 March 2017.
Ms HÜBNER intervened to suggest that the first chapter also look into the transposition of EU law.
The outline of the 27th Bi-annual Report of COSAC was approved.
5. Letters received by the Presidency
The Chair then informed the Troika of the following letters received by the Presidency:
Letters from Mr Olemic THOMMESSEN, President of the Norwegian
Storting,
from Mr
Thomas AESCHI, President of the EFTA/EU Delegation of the Swiss
Assemblée fédérale,
and from Mr Tamar KHULORDAVA, Chair of the Committee on European Integration of
the Parliament of Georgia, requested participation during the COSAC meetings. After
consultation with the Troika, letters of invitation had been sent.
A letter sent by Ms Ana BIRCHALL, Minister Delegate for European Affairs of Romania,
informing the Presidency that she no longer held the chair of the European Affairs
Committee of the Chamber of Deputies, despite still being a member.
A letter sent by Mr Vannino CHITI, President of the Italian
Senato della Repubblica,
recalling the request previously made to the Slovak Presidency to organise a visit
in loco
to
places seriously affected by and struggling to cope with the effects of migration. Mr
BUSUTTIL promised that he would speak personally to Mr CHITI regarding this proposal.
2
EUU, Alm.del - 2016-17 - Bilag 370: Referat fra Trojka-møde og COSAC-formandsmøde i Valletta 22-23/1-17
6. Any other business
The first item on discussion was the co-financing of the Permanent Member of the COSAC
Secretariat. The Chair announced that, as the current agreement would be expiring at the end of
2017, the Maltese
Kamra tad-deputati
would be sending a letter of intent to the European Union
Affairs Committees of national Parliaments asking them to confirm their intention on maintaining
the current co-financing mechanism for two years starting from 1 January 2018.
The second item referred to the proposals communicated to the Troika members by the European
Parliament on the adoption of COSAC Contributions. With regard to the first proposal, i.e.
providing clear guidance regarding the adoption of the contribution, the Chair said that the
Presidency was in agreement and aimed to circulate a text on this ahead of the meeting. With regard
to the European Parliament’s second proposal that the Troika compromises should only refer to
texts on which there was agreement from all Troika members, the Chair noted that, whereas the
Presidency agreed that a Troika compromise should always be sought, it could not agree to a
proposal which in effect gave veto power over amendments to any single troika delegation.
Ms HÜBNER here interjected to ask how, then, this would be presented, specifically seeking to
know in what form and in which wording (as a “Troika compromise with the exception of a
delegation” or as a “Presidency compromise”, mentioning the delegation for which it was not
possible to achieve consensus), but agreed that there should be no veto power. In reply, the Chair
reiterated the willingness to strive for consensus, and suggested to proceed on a case-by-case basis.
With regard to the proposal that any delegation not agreeing with a Troika compromise text should
submit the original amendment again within the set deadline, the Chair made it clear that once the
Presidency proposed the compromise text, subsequently agreed to by the Troika, then the original
text would cease to exist and any amendments submitted the next day till noon would have to be
amendments to the Troika compromise text.
Ms HÜBNER enquired about the possibility of tabling amendments to the original version of the
text. Mr BLAHA insisted that the authority of the Presidency should be respected in this regard.
The fourth proposal suggested that the Presidency could, if necessary, consider putting to the vote
oral amendments providing clearer and more consensual wording, and the Chair clarified that, since
the Presidency believed in the importance of consensus, it was inclined to accept oral amendments
to amended paragraphs only if this served to reach consensus.
As to whether the Presidency considered that all paragraphs should be formally voted and to what it
thought of the concerns expressed by some delegations on the practice of voting only on the points
where amendments had been re-tabled, the Chair noted that the Presidency was inclined to allow
voting only on paragraphs of the compromise text to which amendments had been moved, and not
on paragraphs to which no amendments had been proposed, whereby a simple declaration signalling
adoption would be enough and would facilitate the running of the meeting.
Ms HÜBNER referred once more to the voting system, and recalled some discontent expressed by
some delegations with how this was implemented in Bratislava, to which Mr BLAHA replied that
this was a matter for the Presidency to decide. Ms HÜBNER referred to voting practices in the
European Parliament. She and the Chair thought that asking the participants themselves whether an
open vote was necessary would perhaps be the best solution.
3