Europaudvalget 2016-17
EUU Alm.del Bilag 882
Offentligt
1787126_0001.png
EUSurvey - Survey
Side 1 af 5
(/eusurvey/home/welcome/runner)
All public surveys (/eusurvey/home/publicsurveys/runner)
Skip to Main Content
Login (/eusurvey/auth/login/runner)
|
Help
|
Language
Save a backup on your local computer (disable if you are using a public/shared computer)
Views
Standar
Public consultation for the evaluation of
the TEN-E regulation
Fields marked with * are mandatory.
Langu
[EN] En
Contac
Identification
1.
Are you replying as:
Larisa.A
(mailto:L
ropa.eu
Downlo
*
.
a private individual
an organisation or a company
a public authority or an international organisation
*
2.
Please indicate your name, the name of your company, organisation, or
institution for which you respond to this consultation.
Danish Ministry of Energy, Utilities and Climate
3.
Is your organisation included in the Transparency Register?
If your organisation is not registered, we invite you
to register here (https://ec.europa.eu/transparencyregister/public/ri/registering.do?locale=en),
although it is not compulsory to be registered to reply to this
consultation. Why
a transparency register? (http://ec.europa.eu/transparencyregister/public/staticPage/displayStaticPage.do?
locale=en&reference=WHY_TRANSPARENCY_REGISTER)
YES
NO
Not applicable
*
4.
Contact email address
@
[email protected]
5.
Where are you based and/or where do you carry out your activity?
*
.
Austria
Belgium
Bulgaria
Croatia
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Denmark
Estonia
Finland
France
https://ec.europa.eu/eusurvey/runner/4cbb5eb0-7b9f-4bcf-afe6-17008bc6b1be?draftid... 11-08-2017
 EUU, Alm.del - 2016-17 - Bilag 882: Europa-Kommissionens høring om evalueringen af forordning om retningslinjer for den transeuropæiske energiinfrastruktur
1787126_0002.png
EUSurvey - Survey
Side 2 af 5
(/eusurvey/home/welcome/runner)
Hungary
Ireland
Italy
Latvia
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Malta
The Netherlands
Poland
Portugal
Romania
Slovakia
Slovenia
Spain
Sweden
United Kingdom
Other
All public surveys (/eusurvey/home/publicsurveys/runner)
Login (/eusurvey/auth/login/runner)
|
Help
|
Language
6.
Your contribution,
Note that, whatever option chosen, your answers
may be subject to a request for public access to documents under Regulation
(http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/PDF/r1049_en.pdf)(EC)
N°1049/2001
can be published with your personal information
(I consent the publication of all information in my contribution in
whole or in part including my name or my organisation's name, and I declare that nothing within my response is unlawful
or would infringe the rights of any third party in a manner that would prevent publication)
can be published provided that you remain anonymous
(I consent to the publication of any information in my
contribution in whole or in part (which may include quotes or opinions I express) provided that it is done anonymously. I
declare that nothing within my response is unlawful or would infringe the rights of any third party in a manner that would
prevent the publication.
7.
Do you have personal knowledge of the TEN-E Regulation and the PCI framework
introduced by the regulation?
*
.
YES
NO
8.
Do you have any experience in participating in a public consultation process, as
part of permit granting, for an energy infrastructure project in your area
or elsewhere?
.
YES
NO
.
Relevance and
coherence
https://ec.europa.eu/eusurvey/runner/4cbb5eb0-7b9f-4bcf-afe6-17008bc6b1be?draftid... 11-08-2017
 EUU, Alm.del - 2016-17 - Bilag 882: Europa-Kommissionens høring om evalueringen af forordning om retningslinjer for den transeuropæiske energiinfrastruktur
1787126_0003.png
EUSurvey - Survey
Side
3 af 5
(/eusurvey/home/welcome/runner)
enhancing trans-European energy infrastructure?
All public surveys (/eusurvey/home/publicsurveys/runner)
Login (/eusurvey/auth/login/runner)
|
Help
|
Language
*
.
YES
NO
Effectiveness
10.
Do you think the implementation of the trans-European energy infrastructure
which allow for interconnecting of national energy networks improves the
energy systems and contributes to keeping energy prices in
check?
*
.
Yes, I am aware of greater energy interconnection across the EU which helps to introduce more market competition
Yes, I am aware that reinforcing our energy networks makes the system more secure
Yes, I am aware that energy networks are becoming more integrated but I was unaware of the benefits that such
integration brings
No, I was not aware that markets across Europe were becoming better interconnected and more integrated
11.
Do you think the implementation of the TEN-E Regulation and develpment of
trans-European energy infrastructure is helping Europe to develop more renewable
energy?
*
.
Yes, I am aware of greater energy infrastructure across the EU which facilitates the development of renewable energy
Yes, I am aware that renewable energy development has increased but was unaware of the connection to trans-
European infrastructure
No, I was not aware of the role for the trans-European energy infrastructure in enabling renewable energy development
12.
One of the aims of the TEN-E Regulation is to improve the transparency of the
planning and development of energy infrastructure projects. Have you noticed any
change in the transparency of the planning and building process since the TEN-E
Regulation was implemented in 2013?
*
.
Yes, energy infrastructure planning and building has become more transparent in recent years
Yes, opportunities for public participation in energy infrastructure development (e.g. public meetings, questionnaires,
information notices) have increased in recent years
No, I have not noticed any changes with regard to transparancy of planning and building of energy infrastructure in recent
years
13.
Do you feel that there are sufficient possibilities in your country to provide
input into the planning and building process of energy infrastructure
projects?
*
.
Yes, there are many possibilities to get involved in energy infrastructure planning and building (e.g. public meetings,
questionnaires, information notices)
There may be sufficient possibilities to get involved in energy infrastructure planning and building but I am not aware of
them
No, I would like to see more opportunities to participate in energy infrastructure development
I am not interested in participating in energy infrastructure planning and building
https://ec.europa.eu/eusurvey/runner/4cbb5eb0-7b9f-4bcf-afe6-17008bc6b1be?draftid... 11-08-2017
 EUU, Alm.del - 2016-17 - Bilag 882: Europa-Kommissionens høring om evalueringen af forordning om retningslinjer for den transeuropæiske energiinfrastruktur
1787126_0004.png
EUSurvey - Survey
Side 4 af 5
(/eusurvey/home/welcome/runner)
All public surveys (/eusurvey/home/publicsurveys/runner)
Login (/eusurvey/auth/login/runner)
value
|
Help
|
Language
14.
Do you think it is worthwhile for the EU to try to enhance regional cooperation
to develop energy infrastructure?
*
.
Yes, it is important for the EU to enhance regional cooperation on energy infrastructure because there are similar
challenges across borders
Yes, it is important for the EU to enhance regional cooperation on energy infrastructure because national governments do
not sufficiently prioritise cross-border links
No, there is already sufficient level of regional cooperation on energy infrastructure
No, regional cooperation on energy infrastructure is not necessary
Alternatives
15.
Do you have any suggestions on how to improve the PCI
framework?
Denmark supports the overall aim of the Regulation to facilitate cross-border energy
infrastructure. We believe this can be achieved through a common understanding of the
implementation of the Regulation. Issues and challenges in this regard could well be
discussed at the annual Energy Infrastructure Forum. On that basis, Denmark does not
see a need to revise the Regulation.
Denmark has encountered different interpretations of the Regulation’s requirements by
the Member States’ national competent authorities. This does not necessarily require
changes to the Regulation but could be remedied through a common understanding of
the Regulation.
Denmark has encountered uncertainties about responsibilities for other Member States’
one-stop-shops. It is our assessment that more time and experience with the Regulation
will probably solve these uncertainties.
It would be useful for the Member States to have the manuals of procedures accessible in
more languages – not just their national language.
It has been a challenge for the project promoters to coordinate the first public consultation
due to different national procedures and understandings of the Regulation. Some
flexibility in the interpretation of the Regulation would be useful.
An example of this need for more flexibility is the Regulation’s requirements that even
projects only crossing a Member State’s territory offshore must hold public meetings in
the Member State concerned, even though there are no obvious parties to the hearing. It
is our experience that there is little or no public interest in these hearings. Therefore, if
possible, it would be helpful if the Regulation could be interpreted in a way that such
situations could be exempted from holding public meetings – but of course with the
possibility of involving citizens through written hearings.
Denmark and the rest of the EU has an interest in ensuring that projects of a common EU
interest are implemented on time, as they reinforce security of supply and are a
prerequisite for achieving the common goals of a genuine internal energy market. On that
basis stronger follow-up mechanisms could be considered to ensure that projects of such
major European importance are completed in due time.
16.
If you wish to add further information - within the scope of this questionnaire
- please feel free to do so here.
1000
character(s) maximum
https://ec.europa.eu/eusurvey/runner/4cbb5eb0-7b9f-4bcf-afe6-17008bc6b1be?draftid... 11-08-2017
 EUU, Alm.del - 2016-17 - Bilag 882: Europa-Kommissionens høring om evalueringen af forordning om retningslinjer for den transeuropæiske energiinfrastruktur
1787126_0005.png
EUSurvey - Survey
Side 5 af 5
(/eusurvey/home/welcome/runner)
infrastructure in reaching EU energy goals.
All public surveys (/eusurvey/home/publicsurveys/runner)
Login (/eusurvey/auth/login/runner)
|
Help
|
Language
Firstly, the expansion of adequate electricity connections between EU Member States is
necessary to promote renewable energy integration, ensure a fully integrated and well-
functioning internal market and increase supply security.
Secondly, infrastructure development should primarily take place on a market-driven
basis and in accordance with the Infrastructure Regulation, avoiding undercutting and
over-investment in infrastructure.
Thirdly, regional cooperation - such as Nordic cooperation - is a crucial tool for
overcoming barriers to the expansion of infrastructure.
17.
Please feel free to upload a concise document, such as a position
paper.
Please
note that the uploaded document will be published alongside your response to the
questionnaire which is the essential input to this open public consultation. The
document is an optional complement and serves as additional background reading
to better understand your position.
Select file to upload
Submit
Save as Draft
EUSurvey is supported by the European Commission's ISA
FAQ (/eusurvey/home/helpparticipants) | Support (/eusurvey/home/support/runner)
programme (http://ec.europa.eu/isa), which promotes interoperability solutions for European public administrations.
https://ec.europa.eu/eusurvey/runner/4cbb5eb0-7b9f-4bcf-afe6-17008bc6b1be?draftid... 11-08-2017