Europaudvalget 2019-20
KOM (2020) 0493 Bilag 1
Offentligt
2246291_0001.png
kom (2020) 0493 - Bilag 1: Kommissionens fremsynsrapport vedr. generelle, langsigtede tendenser – herunder nye muligheder og udfordringer – og EU’s strategiske interesser
Table of Contents
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...........................................................................................................................................2
1.
2.
3.
EMBEDDING STRATEGIC FORESIGHT INTO EU POLICYMAKING .............................................4
RESILIENCE AS A NEW COMPASS FOR EU POLICIES ..................................................................5
A FOUR-DIMENSIONAL ANALYSIS OF RESILIENCE ......................................................................8
3.1. The social and economic dimension ......................................................................................8
3.2. The geopolitical dimension ...................................................................................................... 14
3.3. The green dimension .................................................................................................................. 22
3.4. The digital dimension ................................................................................................................. 29
4. STRATEGIC FORESIGHT AGENDA ............................................................................................................. 35
4.1 Monitoring resilience ....................................................................................................................... 35
4.1.1 Prototype resilience dashboards .............................................................................. 35
4.1.2 Work ahead for monitoring resilience ................................................................... 38
4.2 Horizontal foresight activities to foster effective EU transition-led policies ..... 39
4.3 Thematic strategic foresight agenda ...................................................................................... 40
1
kom (2020) 0493 - Bilag 1: Kommissionens fremsynsrapport vedr. generelle, langsigtede tendenser – herunder nye muligheder og udfordringer – og EU’s strategiske interesser
2246291_0003.png
Executive Summary
President von der Leyen’s political guidelines set a strategic long-term
direction
to achieve the transition towards a green, digital and fair Europe
1
. They lay out a
path for Europe to become the first climate-neutral continent by 2050, to be fit for the digital
age, and to cultivate its unique social market economy and democratic order.
The COVID-19 crisis has shocked the world, both exposing vulnerabilities and
highlighting capacities within the EU.
The pandemic has already claimed the lives of
almost a million people globally and has led to economic, social and psychological hardship.
In the EU, it has exacerbated social and economic inequalities: in 2020, despite various safety
nets, unemployment is projected to rise to more than 9% and real disposable income to drop
by 1%, disproportionately affecting women and poorer households
2
. The EU’s strongly
diversified trade has proven to be a strength, even if reliance on a limited number of non-
EU suppliers for some critical goods and services has been exposed as a vulnerability. The
EU and its Member States were also able to rely on their social market economies,
sustainable ecosystems, robust financial systems and an effective governance framework.
The recovery plan for Europe
3
now shows the way forward:
Next Generation EU aims to
build
a more resilient, sustainable, and fair Europe
through large-scale financial support for
investment and reforms.
Strategic foresight will play a key role in helping future-proof EU policymaking by
ensuring that short-term initiatives are grounded in a longer term perspective.
To
make the most of its potential, this Commission has a strong mandate to put
strategic
foresight
at the heart of EU policymaking
4
. Strategic foresight can help build collective
intelligence in a structured manner to better chart the way forward for the twin green and
digital transitions and to recover from disruptions. With this Communication, the Commission
sets out how it will integrate strategic foresight in EU policymaking and outlines related
priorities. This is vital, as we are entering a new era, where action-oriented foresight will
stimulate strategic thinking and shape EU policies and initiatives, including future
Commission work programmes.
The central theme of this first report is resilience, which has become a new
compass for EU policies with the COVID-19 crisis.
Resilience
is the ability not only to
withstand and cope with challenges but also to undergo transitions in a sustainable, fair, and
democratic manner.
Resilience is necessary in all policy areas to undergo the green and
digital transitions, while maintaining the EU’s core purpose and integrity in a dynamic and at
times turbulent environment.
A more resilient Europe will
recover faster, emerge stronger
from current and future crises, and
better implement the United Nations’
Sustainable
Development Goals.
1
2
A Union that strives for more. Political Guidelines for the next European Commission 2019-2024.
European Commission, European Economic Forecast. Spring 2020.
3
COM(2020)456 final, Europe's moment: Repair and Prepare for the Next Generation.
4
https://ec.europa.eu/commission/sites/beta-political/files/mission-letter-maros-sefcovic-2019_en.pdf
2
kom (2020) 0493 - Bilag 1: Kommissionens fremsynsrapport vedr. generelle, langsigtede tendenser – herunder nye muligheder og udfordringer – og EU’s strategiske interesser
2246291_0004.png
This first annual Strategic Foresight Report outlines how foresight will inform
policies with a view to strengthening
the EU’s resilience in four interrelated
dimensions: social and economic, geopolitical, green, and digital.
It analyses the
EU’s
resilience in response to the COVID-19 crisis in the context of the acceleration or deceleration
of relevant
megatrends,
long-term driving forces that will likely have a large influence on
the future. This Communication shows how policies to improve resilience, by mitigating
vulnerabilities and strengthening capacities, can open new opportunities in each of the four
dimensions. This includes reconsidering the future of wellbeing, work, labour markets and
skills, reconfiguring global value chains, supporting democracy, reforming our rules-based
trading system, building alliances in emerging technologies, and investing in the green and
digital transitions.
This new focus on resilience calls for close monitoring.
This Communication proposes
to move towards
resilience dashboards,
which, once fully developed in cooperation with the
Member States and other key stakeholders, should be used for assessing the vulnerabilities
and capacities of the EU and its Member States in each of the four dimensions. Such analysis
can help answer the question: are we, through our policies and recovery strategy, effectively
making the EU more resilient?
The strategic foresight agenda will encompass horizontal foresight activities and
thematic forward-looking exercises.
For the upcoming year, these include: open strategic
autonomy, the future of jobs and skills for and in the green transition, and deepening the
twinning of the digital and green transitions. This agenda will bring a dynamic perspective
of synergies and trade-offs among EU policy goals, thereby supporting the coherence of EU
policies.
3
kom (2020) 0493 - Bilag 1: Kommissionens fremsynsrapport vedr. generelle, langsigtede tendenser – herunder nye muligheder og udfordringer – og EU’s strategiske interesser
2246291_0005.png
1.
Embedding strategic foresight into EU
policymaking
The Commission has made use of foresight for many years, but now aims to
mainstream it into policymaking in all fields.
Foresight
5
the discipline of exploring,
anticipating and shaping the future
helps build and use collective intelligence in a
structured and systematic way to anticipate developments and better prepare for change.
Horizon scanning
6
,
the
assessment of
megatrends, emerging issues and their policy
implications, as well as the exploration of alternative futures
via visioning and scenario
planning, are key to informing strategic political choices.
Strategic foresight in support of EU
policymaking was first developed under
President Delors’
Cellule de Prospective.
Together
with long-term modelling
7
, it has since informed many policies, including climate action. To
support its long-term ambition of a climate-neutral continent fit for the digital age, the von
der Leyen Commission aims to mainstream strategic foresight into the preparation of major
initiatives. This process is already under way
for instance, the recently adopted
Communication on Critical Raw Materials makes significant use of foresight
8
.
Over the
coming years,
establishing a forward-looking culture in policymaking will be crucial for the
EU to strengthen its capacity to deal with an increasingly volatile and complex world
9
and to
implement its forward-looking political agenda. It will ensure that short-term actions are
grounded in long-term objectives and will allow the EU to lead the way in charting its own
course and shaping the world around it.
Strategic foresight should inform major policy initiatives.
As such, it will become an
integral part of the Commission’s Better Regulation toolbox, for example in
ex ante
impact
assessments. This will ensure that EU policies draw on a clear understanding of possible
future trends, scenarios and challenges, especially in policy areas subject to rapid structural
change. Strategic foresight will also support the regulatory fitness and performance
programme
10
, which identifies opportunities to reduce Europe’s regulatory burden
and helps
assess whether existing EU laws remain ‘fit for the future’
11
.
A regular stream of strategic foresight activities will support EU policymaking.
The
annual Strategic Foresight Reports will contribute to an inclusive reflection on questions of
Strategic foresight
draws useful insights for strategic planning, policymaking and preparedness, (European Commission, 2017,
Strategic
Foresight Primer).
It is not about predicting the future but about exploring different plausible futures that could arise and the opportunities
and challenges they could present. It involves identifying trends and emerging issues, using them to create visions and associated pathways
to make better decisions and act in the present in order to shape the future we want.
(https://www.sciencedirect.com/book/9780128225967/science-for-policy-handbook).
6
Horizon scanning
is part of trend analysis and is typically used to add context in foresight activities. It can act as a forum to review and
share information about future developments, provide orientation, identify opportunities and serve as an early warning system.
7
Modelling uses historical data as inputs to make informed estimates on the direction of future trends. Strategic foresight and modelling
are complementary approaches for anticipatory- and evidence-based policy making.
8
European Commission, 2020, Critical Raw Materials for strategic technologies and sectors
a foresight study (doi: 10.2873/58081),
accompanying COM(2020)474 final, Critical Raw Materials Resilience: Charting a Path towards greater Security and Sustainability.
9
https://www.routledge.com/Transforming-the-Future-Open-Access-Anticipation-in-the-21st-Century/Miller/p/book/9781138485877.
10
https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/law-making-process/evaluating-and-improving-existing-laws/refit-making-eu-law-simpler-and-less-costly.
11
Foresight can for instance, help apply the innovation principle when designing and reviewing European laws
(https://ec.europa.eu/info/news/innovation-principle-makes-eu-laws-smarter-and-future-oriented-experts-say-2019-nov-25_en).
5
4
kom (2020) 0493 - Bilag 1: Kommissionens fremsynsrapport vedr. generelle, langsigtede tendenser – herunder nye muligheder og udfordringer – og EU’s strategiske interesser
2246291_0006.png
strategic
importance for Europe’s future, analysing key trends, defining topics of critical
interest for the EU and exploring ways to pursue our aspirations (Section 4). The preparation
of future reports will be based on
full foresight cycles
12
, including in-depth and participatory
foresight exercises on major initiatives, and will aim to feed into the annual State of the
Union address, Commission work programmes, and multiannual programming exercises.
Building on in-house resources
13
, external expertise
and cooperation with Member States,
other key stakeholders and citizens, the
Commission will expand its strategic foresight
capacities to assess risks and opportunities, aid early warning and situational awareness
14
,
and explore alternative futures.
Strategic foresight will foster participatory and forward-looking governance in
Europe and beyond.
The Commission will build close foresight cooperation and alliances
with other EU institutions, notably in the context of the European Strategy and Policy Analysis
System (ESPAS)
15
,
reaching out to international partners
and
launching an EU-wide foresight
network to develop partnerships that draw on Member States’ public foresight capabilities,
think tanks, academia and civil society. Embedding foresight in EU policymaking needs to
happen in an iterative and systematic way, building on approaches that have already proven
effective. It will help develop a shared vision of policymaking at the highest political level,
while allowing for the upscaling of best practices and keeping the door open to
experimentation.
2.
Resilience as a new compass for EU Policies
The COVID-19 crisis has exposed a number of vulnerabilities in the EU and its
Member States.
An analysis of the impacts of the crisis, beyond its terrible human toll,
reveals
severe disruptions across Europe’s economy and society. Preparedness and
prevention, early warning systems and coordination structures were clearly under strain, thus
underlining the need for more ambitious crisis management for large-scale emergencies at
EU level. In the first months of the pandemic, many hospitals were overwhelmed, free
movement of people and goods was severely restrained and essential medicines and
equipment were in short supply. The need to treat COVID-19 patients affected the capacity
of the system to deal with non-COVID-19 patients, while residential care facilities and
essential support services for older people and persons with disabilities were particularly
challenged. Schools and universities were forced to close, many ill-prepared to offer digital
learning alternatives to classrooms, particularly to children from disadvantaged backgrounds
A
foresight cycle
can take up to one year to complete and covers: a diagnosis of how past developments have led to the current situation,
the likely future evolution based on trends and emerging issues if no action is taken, and alternative future possibilities; collective visions;
alternative roadmaps and a timetable for their implementation; the selection of pathways and associated strategies, actions and
partnerships; and the definition of adequate monitoring indicators, so that actions can be adapted along the way. The
external dimension
of foresight cycles includes engaging systematically in strategic discussions with Member States, European institutions, citizens, civil society
and key stakeholders. The
internal dimension
includes the mainstreaming of strategic foresight into policy- and decision-making, through
methods such as impact assessments, alternative scenario planning and testing and information sharing to build collective intelligence.
13
The Commission’s foresight capacities include the Joint Research Centre’s
Competence Centre on Foresight
and the Commission’s
strategic foresight network, coordinated by the Secretariat-General.
14
Situational awareness is the part of decision-making aimed to perceive environmental elements and events with respect to time or
space, to understand what they mean, and to projection their future status.
15
https://espas.secure.europarl.europa.eu/orbis/espas2018about.
12
5
kom (2020) 0493 - Bilag 1: Kommissionens fremsynsrapport vedr. generelle, langsigtede tendenser – herunder nye muligheder og udfordringer – og EU’s strategiske interesser
2246291_0007.png
or those with a disability. Overall, confinement measures have had a much more severe
effect on the economy than the 2008 financial crisis.
After an uneasy start, the EU and its Member States pulled together to deal with
the crisis.
Agility and leadership at all levels of government played a key role in our
response. Initial knee-jerk competition for scarce medical resources and unilateral actions by
Member States in the single market and Schengen Area quickly evolved into improved
cooperation and coordination, facilitated by the Commission. The EU devised innovative
solutions and demonstrated its resilience capacities. EU manufacturers and 3D printing
companies
16
swiftly adapted their production lines to produce facemasks, ventilators and
hand sanitiser
17
. The Commission established the first-ever common strategic reserve of
medical equipment as part of rescEU and helped facilitate more than 350 flights to bring
stranded EU citizens back home. After initial border restrictions resulting in supply
bottlenecks, the Commission implemented and coordinated the green lanes allowing freight
transport to move unhindered18. Distance learning was established to compensate for
closed schools and universities. Companies and administrations shifted to teleworking where
possible. Consumers turned to e-commerce and home deliveries. Member States put in place
safety nets to protect firms and workers during the confinement measures. Between April
and May 2020, the Commission adopted a safety net package
19
and issued country-specific
recommendations under the European Semester
20
that applied maximum flexibility to
accommodate this extraordinary situation. It also put forward a coordinated strategy to lift
confinement measures and a comprehensive recovery plan
21
. Therefore, the pandemic has
also underlined Europe’s capacity to act in the face of adversity.
Resilience refers to the
ability
not only to withstand and cope with challenges but
also to transform in a sustainable, fair, and democratic manner
22
. In light of the
COVID-19 crisis and of the transition-led political agenda, it is clear that Europe needs to
further strengthen its resilience and bounce forward, i.e. not only recover but emerge
stronger by intensifying these transitions. The EU needs to draw lessons from the pandemic,
anticipate future developments, and strike the right balance between the wellbeing of current
and future generations
23
.
The EU’s vulnerabilities
and resilience capacities are analysed in the light of
relevant megatrends,
long-term driving forces that will most likely have a significant
influence on the future. Fourteen global megatrends have been identified by the
16
Formlabs produced 150 000 swabs with 250 printers each day. Similarly, Paris hospital workers scanned valves, syringe pumps and
medical plug connections and produced medical material with 60 3D printers to avoid shortages.
17
https://ec.europa.eu/info/live-work-travel-eu/health/coronavirus-response/coronavirus-european-solidarity-
action_en#euindustrystepsintoprotecteuropeancitizens
18
C(2020)1897 final, Communication from the Commission on the implementation of the Green Lanes under the Guidelines for border
management measures to protect health and ensure the availability of goods and essential service.
19
https://ec.europa.eu/info/live-work-travel-eu/health/coronavirus-response/overview-commissions-response_en#economic-measures
20
https://ec.europa.eu/info/publications/2020-european-semester-country-specific-recommendations-commission-recommendations_en
21
COM(2020)456 final, Europe's moment: Repair and Prepare for the Next Generation.
22
Manca, A.R., Benczur, P., and Giovannini, E., 2017,
Building a scientific narrative towards a more resilient EU society.
23
Giovannini, E., Benczur, P., Campolongo, F., Cariboni, J., Manca, A.R, 2020.
Time for transformative resilience: the COVID-19 emergency,
Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.
6
kom (2020) 0493 - Bilag 1: Kommissionens fremsynsrapport vedr. generelle, langsigtede tendenser – herunder nye muligheder og udfordringer – og EU’s strategiske interesser
2246291_0008.png
Commission’s
Megatrends Hub
24
. Section 3 provides a preliminary systematic analysis of the
vulnerabilities and capacities revealed by the crisis in the EU and its Member States, in light
of the possible acceleration or slowing down of these megatrends due to the crisis, as
depicted in
Figure 2.1.
For instance, COVID-19 has deepened inequalities, as well as
accelerated hyperconnectivity and demographic imbalances. The analysis also identifies
major opportunities to strengthen Europe’s resilience through relevant policy action.
Figure 2.1
Potential impact of COVID-19 on megatrends
Forward-looking
policies supported by foresight will strengthen the EU’s resilience.
Foresight can help anticipate developments likely to have adverse impacts, to strengthen
resilience through structural changes
25
.
Figure 2.2
shows one cycle of how strategic
foresight can inform resilience-enhancing policies across the social and economic,
geopolitical, green, and digital dimensions, taking into account the impact of the crisis on
relevant megatrends. Policies benefitting from strategic foresight can better mitigate the
vulnerabilities and strengthen the capacities revealed by the crisis, opening new
opportunities and making Europe more resilient. This is a continuous process, with constant
re-evaluation and feedback loops.
These long-term
driving forces are identified and monitored by the Commission’s Joint Research Centre (JRC). They are continually
reviewed by JRC experts to include updates and accommodate associated trends of relevance or interest for the EU Commission Services.
The definitions of the 14 megatrends are available at:
https://ec.europa.eu/knowledge4policy/foresight/tool/megatrends-hub_en.
See also
the ESPAS Report 2019: Global Trends to 2030 (https://ec.europa.eu/knowledge4policy/publication/espas-report-2019-global-trends-
2030_en).
25
European Parliamentary Research Service, 2020, Towards a more resilient Europe post-coronavirus. An initial mapping of structural risks
facing the EU.
24
7
kom (2020) 0493 - Bilag 1: Kommissionens fremsynsrapport vedr. generelle, langsigtede tendenser – herunder nye muligheder og udfordringer – og EU’s strategiske interesser
2246291_0009.png
Figure 2.2
Link between strategic foresight and resilience
3.
A Four-Dimensional Analysis of Resilience
3.1. The social and economic dimension
The social and economic dimension of resilience refers to the ability to tackle
economic shocks and achieve long-term structural change in a fair and inclusive
way.
It means building the social and economic conditions for a recovery geared towards
the transitions, promoting social and regional cohesion, and supporting the most vulnerable
in society, while taking into account demographic trends, and in line with the European Pillar
of Social Rights.
Capacities
Europe’s social and economic resilience rests on its population and its unique social
market economy.
It combines a highly skilled workforce and competitive economy with
social systems that aim to protect people from adverse events and help them cope with
change. Through social dialogue, social partners contribute to sustainable and inclusive
growth. People across the EU have guaranteed access to education and social protection
measures, such as sickness and unemployment benefits, family leave and flexible work
arrangements. Although put under stress, this model played a key role in cushioning the
effects of the crisis, for instance by safeguarding jobs and keeping companies afloat
26
. Some
Member States have been hit harder by the crisis, mainly due to their different economic
structures and fiscal space. Member States with higher levels of public debt might generally
be more constrained in cushioning the impact of the crisis. However, national measures were
complemented by those at EU level, in particular the three major safety nets for workers,
26
https://esip.eu/new/details/2/82-COVID-19%20?social_security=
8
kom (2020) 0493 - Bilag 1: Kommissionens fremsynsrapport vedr. generelle, langsigtede tendenser – herunder nye muligheder og udfordringer – og EU’s strategiske interesser
2246291_0010.png
businesses and government, worth €540 billion, which were endorsed in April 2020 by the
European Council
27
. Looking to the future, the EU’s strong public education system
helps
deliver the skills needed to prepare for the jobs of tomorrow, a key element in ensuring a
just transition towards the green and digital economy.
Europe can also rely on the strength of its single market
28
. The single market improves
mobility, ensures that innovative business models can flourish, making it easier for retailers
to do business across borders, and enhances access to goods and services throughout the
EU. Transport infrastructure, the single currency and diversified economic sectors are
amongst the key enablers of the economic resilience. Across the single market, economic,
regional and social diversity equips the Union with an unparalleled competitive advantage
on a global scale and underpins its collective resilience.
Europe’s strong trade and investment links will help get the economy back on
track.
With 85% of the world’s future growth projected to occur outside of the EU and with
35 million European jobs depending on exports and 16 million on foreign investment, trade
and investment will be key to connect Europe to external sources of growth. This is especially
true as demand is likely to pick up asymmetrically after the crisis.
The EU’s financial system has drawn
important lessons from the 2008 financial
crisis.
It proved resilient in the early days of the pandemic, thanks in part to the EU financial
reform agenda, in particular the creation of the Banking Union.
It is now far more robust,
with banks better capitalised to focus on lending to households and companies than in
2008
29
.
Opportunities for businesses to raise financing on capital markets have improved as
well.
Collaborative and non-profit organisations strengthen social and economic
resilience.
Cooperatives, mutual societies, non-profit associations, foundations and social
enterprises have helped public services cope with the crisis
30
. They have demonstrated their
ability to provide a wide range of products and services across the single market in
circumstances where for-profit companies would not have been able to generate adequate
returns on capital, thus creating and preserving millions of jobs
31
. They are also a crucial
engine for social innovation.
European solidarity is key to overcoming collective challenges like COVID-19.
Cohesion policy and the EU Solidarity Fund play a key role in the Coronavirus Response
https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/ecfin/item-
detail.cfm?item_id=675083&utm_source=ecfin_newsroom&utm_medium=Website&utm_campaign=ecfin&utm_content=EU%20leaders
%20approve%20%20billion%20package%20of%20safety%20nets%20and%20task%20Commission%20&lang=en.
28
The EU Single Market accounts for 450 million consumers and 22.5 million small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs).
29
Euro area banking sector resilient to stress caused by coronavirus, ECB analysis shows:
https://www.bankingsupervision.europa.eu/press/pr/date/2020/html/ssm.pr200728~7df9502348.en.html.
30
In COVID-19 crisis, for example, organisations such as
SOS Médecins
in France were alleviating the pressure on the health service and
hospitals by providing doctor home visits for persons who needed it. In the UK over 30% of home nursing were provided by social
enterprises
(http://www.oecd.org/coronavirus/policy-responses/social-economy-and-the-covid-19-crisis-current-and-future-roles-
f904b89f/#:~:text=The%20COVID%2D19%20crisis%20has%20allowed%20the%20social%20economy%20to,to%20provide%20goods
%20and%20services).
31
There are two million social economy enterprises in Europe, representing 10% of all businesses in the EU. More than 11 million people,
about 6% of EU’s employees, work for social economy enterprises:
https://ec.europa.eu/growth/sectors/social-economy_en.
27
9
kom (2020) 0493 - Bilag 1: Kommissionens fremsynsrapport vedr. generelle, langsigtede tendenser – herunder nye muligheder og udfordringer – og EU’s strategiske interesser
2246291_0011.png
Investment Initiative, helping exposed sectors like healthcare, SMEs, and labour markets in
the most affected Member States and regions
32
. The Emergency Support Instrument
a
financing arm of the Joint European Roadmap towards lifting COVID-19 confinement
measures
allows mitigating the consequences of the pandemic in a coordinated manner
at EU level
33
.
Vulnerabilities
The crisis exposed health and social vulnerabilities in Europe.
Residential care
facilities and support services for older people and persons with disabilities were structurally
vulnerable and unprepared to cope with and control the spread of the coronavirus. Those
with chronic diseases, especially with weak immune systems or respiratory problems, have
been especially affected. Health systems in several Member States, as well as the
pharmaceutical industry, were not fully prepared, experiencing problems including shortages
of personal protective equipment and chemicals required for the production of
pharmaceuticals. Notably, Europe struggled to prepare and coordinate when the first
warnings began to emerge from China. There is a need to better anticipate health risks and
prevent the spread of new infectious diseases and associated disorders. COVID-19 has
shifted attention away from major health challenges like non-communicable diseases,
notably cancer and obesity.
Confinement measures have affected overall wellbeing.
Together with life
satisfaction, it has dropped to its lowest level in over 40 years
34
. In the first 6 months of
2020, the feeling of loneliness in Europe almost tripled, especially among young and older
people, and mental health challenges increased
35
.
Economic, gender, skills, regional, and ethnic inequalities have all worsened
36
.
COVID-19 increased the number of people in, or at risk of, poverty in Europe
37
. Some of those
economically impacted by the pandemic were also impaired in accessing food
38
. Racial and
ethnic minorities are statistically more at risk of contracting the virus and of facing financial
insecurity
39
. Unequal access to digital infrastructure and services was also exposed by the
crisis, widening the digital divide. Students from disadvantaged backgrounds were less likely
to benefit from online learning, and lower skilled workers were more likely to be employed
in ‘contact jobs’, risking greater exposure to the disease whilst having lower access to
healthcare. (Tele-) working parents, and especially mothers, faced extra burdens with no
In April 2020, the Commission launched two packages of measures to mobilise support against COVID-19: the
Coronavirus Response
Investment Initiative
(CRII) and the
Coronavirus Response Investment Initiative Plus
(CRII+),
which were swiftly endorsed by the European
Parliament and the European Council.
33
https://ec.europa.eu/info/live-work-travel-eu/health/coronavirus-response/emergency-support-instrument_en.
34
https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/europe/well-being-in-europe-addressing-the-high-cost-of-covid-19-on-life-satisfaction#
35
The megatrend ‘shifting health challenges’ (https://ec.europa.eu/knowledge4policy/shifting-health-challenges_en)
has accelerated.
36
The megatrend ‘diversifying inequalities’ (https://ec.europa.eu/knowledge4policy/diversifying-inequalities_en)
has accelerated.
37
Using the
assumptions of the Commission Spring 2020 Economic Forecast, the ‘at risk of poverty’ rate is expected to increase by 4.8
percentage points. The extra policies that Member States have introduced during the crisis can mitigate this increase (to 1.7 percentage
points). Almeida, V., Barrios, S., Christl, M., De-Poli, S., Tumino, A., van der Wielen, W., 2020,
Households’ income and the cushioning effect
of fiscal policy measures in the Great Lockdown. JRC Working Papers on Taxation and Structural Reforms No 06/2020, European
Commission, Joint Research Centre, Seville. JRC121598. Similar findings have been presented in
https://voxeu.org/article/inequality-and-
poverty-effects-lockdown-europe.
38
Foodbanks witnessed an exponential increase in demand worldwide (http://www.fao.org/food-loss-reduction/news/detail/en/c/1271024/).
39
https://www.enar-eu.org/Evidence-of-the-impact-of-Covid-19-on-racialised-communities-exposes-need-to.
32
10
kom (2020) 0493 - Bilag 1: Kommissionens fremsynsrapport vedr. generelle, langsigtede tendenser – herunder nye muligheder og udfordringer – og EU’s strategiske interesser
2246291_0012.png
access to childcare. Front-line workers consisted of a disproportionate number of women,
who represent 70% of all health and social services staff. Domestic violence rose
significantly
40
. In addition, the crisis highlighted the social and economic vulnerability of
extra-EU workers
41
, as well as their crucial contribution to Europe's coronavirus response
42
.
Economic hardship and recession may also lead to higher exposure to organised crime and
a rise in corruption
43
.
Economic sectors and firms have been hit hard by the crisis.
In the second quarter of
2020, still marked by COVID-19 confinement measures in most Member States, seasonally
adjusted GDP decreased by 12.1% in the euro area and by 11.7% in the EU compared with
the previous quarter
44
. Cumulative net revenue losses of EU companies are estimated in the
range of 13-24% of EU GDP
45
.
A fragile corporate sector can lead to company failures, which
can cause lasting economic damage by increasing unemployment, wasting capital, and
destroying the equity of its owners. Business failures also disrupt economic networks and bring
international supply chains to a halt. Even for companies that survive, their capacity to invest
will shrink.
The crisis has also further aggravated payment delays in business transactions
46
.
For small businesses, late payments can make the difference between survival and
bankruptcy, and compromise their ability to pay employees and suppliers, operate, produce
and grow. Given the limited resources and existing obstacles in accessing capital, SMEs may
have less resilience and flexibility in dealing with the costs associated with shocks such as
COVID-19
47
. Public administrations were put under severe strain to provide services to firms
and citizens.
Labour markets have been disrupted
48
, with massive job losses that could have
cascading long-term effects.
Member States’ capacities differ when it comes to financing
safety nets for people and firms to absorb the impact of the crisis, with the ensuing
asymmetries threatening regional and social cohesion. Unlike in previous crises, employment
was hardest hit in the service sector, the engine of job creation over the last decade
49
. Almost
8% of all jobs in Europe, equivalent to 12 million full-time jobs, are forecast to be lost in
2020
50
, without counting the devastating effect on atypical forms of labour and project-
based work. This increases the risk of structural and long-term unemployment, resulting in
40
Affecting particularly women, children and LGBTI+ communities (https://unric.org/en/who-warns-of-surge-of-domestic-violence-as-
covid-19-cases-decrease-in-europe/).
41
https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC120730.
42
https://ec.europa.eu/knowledge4policy/sites/know4pol/files/key_workers_covid_0423.pdf.
43
https://eucrim.eu/news/europol-how-covid-19-shapes-serious-and-organised-crime-landscape-eu/.
44
https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/2995521/11156775/2-31072020-BP-EN.pdf/cbe7522c-ebfa-ef08-be60-b1c9d1bd385b.
45
https://voxeu.org/article/eu-firms-post-covid-19-environment.
46
In March 2020, payment delays in commercial transactions in France tripled compared to the same period in 2019. In Spain, 70% of
SMEs declared to have payment terms unilaterally extended by their debtors. In Italy, payment delays to SMEs in the first quarter of 2020
were estimated at more than
€15 billion.
47
http://www.oecd.org/coronavirus/policy-responses/coronavirus-covid-19-sme-policy-responses-04440101/.
48
COM(2020)112 final, Coordinated economic response to the COVID-19 outbreak.
49
Hospitality, air travel, tourism and culture were hit particularly hard. Some areas like delivery and healthcare saw an increase in jobs,
but these were mainly precarious. Cancelled cultural performances, shut down venues, halted productions, and the related impact on
income, have made the situation of the cultural and creative sector more precarious than ever before. The media sector, playing a key role
for democracy, has also been heavily impacted. Commission estimates of May 2020 foresaw a drop in turnover of over 50% in 2020,
without taking into account further confinement periods. See: SWD(2020)98 final, Identifying Europe's recovery needs; Eurofound, 2020,
COVID-19: Policy responses across Europe, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.
50
https://www.ilo.org/global/about-the-ilo/newsroom/news/WCMS_740893/lang--en/index.htm.
11
kom (2020) 0493 - Bilag 1: Kommissionens fremsynsrapport vedr. generelle, langsigtede tendenser – herunder nye muligheder og udfordringer – og EU’s strategiske interesser
2246291_0013.png
a deskilling of the labour force at precisely the moment when digital and other specialist
skills are key for future employment and 2 out of 5 Europeans lack digital literacy
51
. Young
people entering the workforce at this time will also find it harder to secure their first job
52
.
Moreover, the pandemic hit when 21% of people living in the EU were already at risk of over-
indebtedness
53
.
The Banking Union has been crucial to weathering the storm in the short term, but
the Economic and Monetary Union remains incomplete.
We see more than ever the
long-term importance of a Capital Markets Union, at a time when the role of market finance
for the real economy is indispensable. While opportunities for market finance of businesses
have improved in general, measures to facilitate access to equity finance would make them
more resilient. To build a sustainable future, the EU thus needs a more resilient financial
market infrastructure, with deep and wide capital markets that can be leveraged in a world
of strategic competition.
COVID-19
is likely to contribute to the ongoing trend of Europe’s shrinking
population.
Demographers
54
expect even lower birth rates in Europe due to the uncertainty
caused by the pandemic and ensuing recession
55
. As Europe’s population is ageing, older
people and persons with disabilities are also most prone to poverty and COVID-19
56
, and are
the most socially isolated by distancing measures
57
. Furthermore, demographic trends
impact social and economic resilience as a whole.
Opportunities
Private and public investments are key to social and economic resilience and
recovery.
They must be
in line with the EU’s policy goals of inclusiveness, digitalisation,
decarbonisation and sustainability, and foresight will be instrumental in developing a
perspective that will ensure these conditions are met. The 2021-2027 multiannual financial
framework and Next Generation EU will foster substantial investment, innovation and
economic convergence between Member States,
with safeguards for the rule of law. It
will
also ensure the good functioning of the single market. The Recovery and Resilience Facility
(RRF) will foster social and economic resilience through the support of packages of
investment and reforms.
Funding for companies, especially SMEs, needs to meet their present needs and
those brought about by long-term transitions.
Action to strengthen the banking sector,
capital markets and equity financing, including fostering the Capital Markets Union and
completing the Banking Union, will be important in bolstering the EU’s resilience. Workers
will benefit from such reforms, increasing the ability of firms to secure and create jobs.
51
52
Digital Economy and Society Index 2020 (https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/desi).
European Commission 2020 Spring Economic Forecast.
53
Eurofound, 2020, Addressing household over-indebtedness, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.
54
The megatrend ‘increasing demographic imbalances’
(https://ec.europa.eu/knowledge4policy/increasing-demographic-imbalances_en)
has accelerated.
55
https://population-europe.eu/policy-brief/demography-and-coronavirus-pandemic.
56
https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/demography_report_2020_n.pdf.
57
https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/policy/wess/wess_dev_issues/dsp_policy_01.pdf
and
https://www.brookings.edu/blog/future-development/2020/05/18/which-jobs-are-most-at-risk-because-of-covid-19/.
12
kom (2020) 0493 - Bilag 1: Kommissionens fremsynsrapport vedr. generelle, langsigtede tendenser – herunder nye muligheder og udfordringer – og EU’s strategiske interesser
2246291_0014.png
Adapting social protection systems to labour markets marked by the movement of workers
between professions and countries will be important for preserving employment. Investment
in human capital and innovation, well-functioning institutions and an attractive business
environment are key.
COVID-19 has produced rapid shifts in labour markets.
Changes predicted to happen
over decades, such as entire organisations, national administrations, and companies
teleworking, or virtual conferences and events replacing face-to-face gatherings
58
, have
taken place in weeks due to the pandemic
59
. While a part of this shift is likely to be temporary,
it will open the door to new employment opportunities and strengthen integration of the
European labour market. It also presents an opportunity to rethink and adapt forms of
employment and career models.
Schools and universities had to go virtual almost overnight, presenting new
opportunities for delivering education and learning
60
. Hyperconnectivity and cross-
border cooperation between education institutions, new pedagogical approaches and delivery
modes (e.g. virtual or blended), advancements in cognitive sciences, information availability
and greater emphasis on lifelong learning are all contributing to changes in learning models
and access to education.
Disruption of established lifestyles has intensified the debate on how we measure
progress and conceive ‘wellbeing’.
As stressed in the 2020 annual sustainable growth
strategy
61
, economic growth is not an end in itself. In December 2019, the Commission
presented the
European Green Deal,
the new EU growth strategy that aims to transform the
Union into a modern, resource-efficient and competitive economy where climate and
environmental challenges are turned into opportunities. The crisis has reignited the debate
on what kind of economic growth is desirable, what actually matters for human wellbeing in
a world of finite resources and on the need for new metrics to measure progress beyond
GDP growth. The EU is well-placed to assume an international leadership role and promote
inclusive growth and equality, with the United Nations (UN) Sustainable Development Goals
(SDGs) at the centre of economic policy
62
. The SDGs can be regarded as a means to achieving
greater resilience. In turn, strategic foresight can help identify the best ways to meet the
SDGs.
Strategic foresight can help identify further social and economic opportunities and
pathways to achieve the green, digital, and fair transitions.
This includes designing
new social and fiscal reforms and testing their long-term sustainability, to reinvigorate
Europe’s social market economy model while ensuring the EU’s leading role in the global
The megatrend ‘changing nature of work’ (https://ec.europa.eu/knowledge4policy/foresight/changing-nature-work_en)
has accelerated.
https://www2.deloitte.com/be/en/pages/covid-19/articles/workforce/workforce-strategy.html
60
The megatrend ‘diversification of education and learning’
(https://ec.europa.eu/knowledge4policy/diversification-education-learning_en)
has accelerated.
61
https://ec.europa.eu/info/publications/2020-european-semester-annual-sustainable-growth-strategy_en.
62
The SDGs (https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals/) are a roadmap for humanity encompassing
almost every aspect of human and planetary well-being.
They are a key tool to reboot Europe’s growth strategy towards competitive
sustainability, ensuring that the economy works for everyone and that growth is sustainable. To support the central role of SDGs in
economic policymaking, and in particular in the European Semester, Eurostat publishes an
annual monitoring report.
58
59
13
kom (2020) 0493 - Bilag 1: Kommissionens fremsynsrapport vedr. generelle, langsigtede tendenser – herunder nye muligheder og udfordringer – og EU’s strategiske interesser
2246291_0015.png
economy. Strategic foresight is also relevant for shaping the occupations of the future,
identifying new skills necessary for the green and digital economy, learning patterns and
partnerships, and understanding the related interplay between new technologies, jobs,
education, and key stakeholders. In light of broader demographic trends affecting some rural
areas, challenges exacerbated by regional and local inequalities, as well as a geography of
discontent, a long term vision on rural areas will also be required, taking into account social
and economic development, infrastructure needs, access to basic services, and territorial
cohesion; this long-term vision should cut across several policy areas and require an
integrated and coordinated approach at European, national, and regional level. Finally,
strategic foresight could support the reflection on a new meaning for progress and wellbeing
and on indicators that would be most meaningful for measuring these aspirations (Section
4).
3.2. The geopolitical dimension
Geopolitical resilience relates to Europe
bolstering its ‘open strategic autonomy’
63
and global leadership role.
It is anchored in the expression of the EU’s values within a
highly interdependent world of competing powers, where COVID-19 has impacted
geopolitical trends and power balances. As the United States turns further inwards, it leaves
a void on the global stage, which other players such as China
64
are eager to fill. In mobilising
strategic resources for humanitarian and development aid and striving to make a COVID-19
vaccine and medicines available
worldwide, the EU is playing a leading role through its ‘Team
Europe’ approach
65
.
Capacities
The EU is considered a trusted partner and responsible leader.
As the global order
threatens to erode and fragment, the EU can act as an anchor of stability and a guarantor
of peace. The EU mediates in situations of crisis, brokers international agreements and uses
its convening power to craft global solutions to global problems. The pandemic shows that
global challenges require effective, agile international cooperation and common solutions.
The EU actively shapes cooperation in global governance structures, and its foreign and
security policy is underpinned by multi-faceted diplomacy and strategic partnerships with
key players and regions. The EU’s
foreign and security policy priorities are driven by its global
strategy. Understanding the importance of security and defence cooperation, the EU has,
amongst other things, established a European Defence Fund and the Permanent Structured
Cooperation (PESCO)
66
, and has launched a military mobility initiative.
Open strategic autonomy is defined as the EU’s commitment to open and fair trade, preserving the benefits of an open economy
and
supporting partners around the world to lead the renewed and reinvigorated form of multilateralism the world needs. At the same time,
the EU is aware of the need to reduce its dependency and strengthen its security of supply across key technologies and value chains
(COM(2020)456 final,
Europe's moment: Repair and Prepare for the Next Generation).
64
https://www.cfr.org/conference-calls/after-covid-19-chinas-role-world-and-us-china-relations.
65
The objective of the “Team Europe” approach is to combine resources from the EU, its Member States, and financial institutions,
in
particular the European Investment Bank and the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development.
66
Articles 42(6) and 46 TEU, and Protocol No 10.
63
14
kom (2020) 0493 - Bilag 1: Kommissionens fremsynsrapport vedr. generelle, langsigtede tendenser – herunder nye muligheder og udfordringer – og EU’s strategiske interesser
2246291_0016.png
Europe’s extensive global trade capacity underpins its geopolitical power and
resilience.
An analysis of trade dependency for products relying on a small number of
suppliers shows that, for almost all products imported into the EU, there are alternative
sources of supply. Just 1% of the EU’s total import value is sourced from a sole supplier,
whereas 10% is sourced from no less than 67 alternative suppliers, and half of all products
come from more than 25 suppliers worldwide
67
. In addition, over two-thirds of EU imports
are intermediate inputs used in its production processes. The EU is therefore consistently
able to use its economic leverage and bargaining power to deliver international agreements
that protect its citizens.
The EU is a space power.
It has developed critical space capabilities, which serve as a
geopolitical tool to strengthen its global role in technology development and surveillance
68
.
Several critical economic sectors rely on services provided
by Europe’s space-based
assets.
The EU builds resilience in its neighbourhood and beyond.
It is the world’s largest
donor of development and humanitarian aid, focusing in particular on its neighbourhood and
Africa. Europe supports partner countries with funding, training and structural improvements
to boost their development and resilience, as well as in implementing the SDGs. In addition,
through the Eastern Partnership initiative, the EU contributes to increasing the stability,
prosperity and resilience of its neighbours, by helping them progress in the green and digital
transitions.
The EU has a long-standing capacity and legacy in shaping international standards
and norms.
It now needs to strengthen forward-looking alliances to continue shaping
international norms and standards in a way that reflects European values and interests.
Despite the EU’s track record of proactive engagement with the UN family and other
international organisations in various fora
69
, such alliances are particularly relevant in the
face of growing pressure from influential global players.
The EU can apply its geopolitical capacities and international clout coherently and
effectively now and in the future.
Europe will need to continue developing a strategic
network of partnerships and alliances to reduce dependencies in critical value chains, help
peace and stability in its neighbourhood, seek effective solutions to global problems and
revitalise a rules-based multilateral global order, as well as to leverage its financial
resources in support of its political objectives. The EU is in a strong position to shape the
multilateral system of global economic governance, develop mutually beneficial relations to
boost its competitiveness
70
, and to advance and set global standards for the green and
digital transitions. This should be done while promoting its democratic values and ensuring
coherence with broader priorities in the areas of sustainability, climate change, digital
economy and security.
https://ecipe.org/blog/how-survive-trade-apocalypse/.
For instance, satellite navigation, Earth Observation, telecommunication, For Galileo Public Regulated Service.
69
The United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), the International Telecommunications Union (ITU), and the World
Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO). Also, with the G7, the G20, the OECD, the Council of Europe, Internet Cooperation for Assigned
Names and Numbers (ICANN), the World Trade Organization (WTO), ASEAN and ASEM.
70
COM(2020)102 final, A New Industrial Strategy for Europe; SWD(2020)98 final, Identifying Europe's recovery needs.
68
67
15
kom (2020) 0493 - Bilag 1: Kommissionens fremsynsrapport vedr. generelle, langsigtede tendenser – herunder nye muligheder og udfordringer – og EU’s strategiske interesser
2246291_0017.png
Vulnerabilities
Multilateralism and the global financial system are under increasing pressure from
narrow national interests.
Preserving a space for consensus-building and joint action to
address global challenges and protect common public goods is central to geopolitical
resilience.
The shift of power to the East and South is a global megatrend.
Although it has
temporarily decelerated as a result of the COVID-19 crisis, it is likely to continue as it is
driven by the growing economic and political weight of emerging players, supported by their
demographic weight. As the EU’s share in the world population and in global GDP
diminishes
71
, this may have a further impact on its clout in many critical areas.
The security environment is continuously changing.
It is marked by the shifting balance
of power, increasing use of hybrid threats, space and cyber warfare, disinformation, and the
growing role of non-state actors
72
. The crisis has also further exacerbated pressures that can
lead to conflict. The impact of economic measures driven by political considerations, such as
the extra-territorial impact of sanctions or protectionist measures, poses additional
challenges to the EU. The COVID-19 pandemic has shown the fragility of key infrastructure
and the need to protect it against physical and digital threats
73
. The crisis has also worsened
existing vulnerabilities and inequalities in conflict-affected and fragile countries. To foster a
coherent strategic vision, the EU needs a common understanding of the security environment
as well as common goals and objectives. By the end of 2020, the High Representative will
present an analysis of threats and challenges, as background for a Strategic Compass on
security and defence, to be delivered by 2022. This will provide a crucial contribution to
developing a common European security and defence culture, give new impetus to different
defence initiatives and reinforce their coherence
74
.
Managing migration in an orderly way will continue to be a priority.
The root causes
of migration, including local conflicts, poverty and inequalities exacerbated due to the COVID-
19 crisis and climate change, will continue
75,76
. Addressing these challenges
77
will require
enhanced attention, agility, resources, and diplomatic efforts underpinned by assistance,
alongside strategic, balanced and tailor-made partnerships with key third countries in order
to find sustainable and effective solutions to managing migration
78
.
A lack of unity in specific foreign and security policy areas is a source of fragility.
The EU’s strength
and credibility abroad has a direct correlation to its internal unity and
https://ec.europa.eu/research/social-sciences/pdf/policy_reviews/global-europe-2050-report_en.pdf.
COM(2020)605 final, The EU Security Union Strategy.
73
Ibidem
74
D. Fiott, 2020, Uncharted territory? Towards a common threat analysis and a strategic compass for EU security and defence, European
Institute of Security Studies
75
The World Bank estimates that, by 2050, climate change could force over 140 million people to become internal climate migrants across
Africa, South Asia and Latin America (https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2018/03/19/climate-change-could-force-over-
140-million-to-migrate-within-countries-by-2050-world-bank-report).
76
This also requires further evidences and research, analysing the complexity of long-term intertwined factors, as part of the foresight
approach, as developed by the Knowledge Centre for Demography (https://ec.europa.eu/knowledge4policy/migration-demography_en).
77
COM(2020)605 final, The EU Security Union Strategy.
78
Solutions will be put forward by way of legislative and non-legislative initiatives under the new Pact on Migration and Asylum.
72
71
16
kom (2020) 0493 - Bilag 1: Kommissionens fremsynsrapport vedr. generelle, langsigtede tendenser – herunder nye muligheder og udfordringer – og EU’s strategiske interesser
2246291_0018.png
cohesion, which builds on its diversity. A lack of unity and coordination among Member States
can, at times, limit the effectiveness and agility of action at EU level, which might enable
foreign powers to apply divide-and-rule strategies.
The COVID-19
crisis has revealed Europe’s overreliance on non-EU
suppliers for
critical raw materials
79
, and has highlighted how supply disruptions can affect
industrial ecosystems and other productive sectors.
While there are alternative
sources of supply for most products, Europe is increasingly reliant on a limited number of
external suppliers for some critical goods, components, and raw materials (Box
3.1),
as well
as agricultural products. Factory closures in COVID-19 hotspots in China and northern Italy
led to Europe-wide shutdowns of automotive plants, resulting in losses equivalent to 12.5%
of the total production for 2019
80
. A similar picture emerges for pharmaceuticals from India
leading to shortages in generic drugs
81
. In April 2020, European industrial production had
decreased by 27% over 12 months
82
. Moreover, Europe relies heavily on third countries for
advanced components for data processing, in particular microprocessors, with only around
10% of global production in the EU
83
. With escalating global tensions, European supply chains
are increasingly vulnerable.
79
Global supply chains are highly complex. Multinational enterprises are responsible for two thirds of international trade with a high
fragmentation of production of intermediate goods shipped between different production sites (https://iap.unido.org/articles/lessons-past-
disruptions-global-value-chains; https://www.entrepreneur.com/article/349229).
80
https://www.acea.be/press-releases/article/298-automobile-factories-operating-across-europe-new-data-shows.
81
https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/covid19_e/trade_related_goods_measure_e.htm.
82
https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/2995521/10294900/4-12062020-AP-EN.pdf/93c51a4c-e401-a66d-3ab3-6ecd51a1651f
83
https://www.economist.com/leaders/2018/12/01/chip-wars-china-america-and-silicon-supremacy.
17
kom (2020) 0493 - Bilag 1: Kommissionens fremsynsrapport vedr. generelle, langsigtede tendenser – herunder nye muligheder og udfordringer – og EU’s strategiske interesser
2246291_0019.png
Box 3.1: CASE STUDY - Critical raw materials
Irrespective of supply disruptions during the COVID-19 crisis, the EU is heavily dependent
on non-EU countries for critical raw materials that are essential for staying at the forefront
of global competition
be it in economic or defence terms (Figure 3.1).
Addressing over-
dependency on non-EU countries for critical raw materials
84
, such as graphite, cobalt, lithium and rare
earths
85
, is therefore one of the crucial elements to bolster Europe’s open strategic autonomy in key
technologies needed to achieve a carbon-neutral and digital society. These include batteries, fuel cells,
solar and wind energy, as well as hydrogen. As more of these technologies are deployed, the EU risks
replacing its reliance on fossil fuels with a dependency on a range of raw materials, many of which
are sourced from abroad. According to a high demand scenario, the EU would need 18 times more
lithium by 2030 and 60 times more by 2050
86
.
Figure 3.2
indicates that global extraction of raw
materials, including critical raw materials, is projected to more than double by 2050.
High dependency calls for greater resilience and diversification of supply,
notably by making
better use of EU domestic sourcing, the circularity of raw materials or the extension of products’
lifetime with a focus on reuse, repair and recycling, as well as through our strategic trade policy and
diplomacy.
Exploiting the
urban mines,
that is, recovering raw materials from urban waste through
recycling, could eventually satisfy a large share of the EU’s demand for critical raw
materials
87
.
Europe is a global leader in its infrastructure for recycling metals, and European industry
produces over half of its base metals from recycled sources, compared to 19% in the rest of the world.
But more needs to be done if the EU is to secure the resources it needs to realise the green and digital
transitions.
Europe’s own mineral resources are under-exploited,
and the EU has vulnerabilities in
processing, recycling, refining and separation
88
.
This is due to high production costs compared to
global market prices, high environmental standards and current low levels of public acceptance.
Investment in the production of primary and secondary raw materials would benefit employment in
all manufacturing industries. Mining and refining in the EU already employs 3.4 million workers, while
related manufacturing accounts for a further 25 million jobs. Repair and materials recovery provide
2.2 million jobs, a number which is growing.
These investments could help retain existing geological
and metallurgical high-tech skills and develop new ones
to boost the EU’s global competitiveness
in a
sector that has solid growth potential in the 21
st
century. However, investments in the EU’s mining
capacities should not come at the expense of environmental standards.
84
Strategies to overcome dependencies include diversifying sources, developing substitutes, or prolonging the life of related products.
European industry, especially battery, motor and wind generator production, depends on imports of graphite (of which 48% comes from
China), cobalt (of which 68% comes from the Democratic Republic of Congo), lithium (of which 78% comes from Chile) and rare earths (of
which nearly 100% come from China).
86
European Commission,
Critical Raw Materials for strategic technologies and sectors
a foresight study,
2020 (doi: 10.2873/58081).
87
www.prosumproject.eu.
88
https://minatura2020.eu.
85
18
kom (2020) 0493 - Bilag 1: Kommissionens fremsynsrapport vedr. generelle, langsigtede tendenser – herunder nye muligheder og udfordringer – og EU’s strategiske interesser
2246291_0020.png
Figure 3.1
89
Supply risk of raw materials for key technologies
90
Figure 3.2. Global material extraction by resource type
91
89
Figure 3.1 shows supply risks for raw materials (on a scale of 1 to 6), key technologies in which they are used and their geographical
sources.
90
European Commission, 2020, Critical Raw Materials for strategic technologies and sectors
a foresight study (doi: 10.2873/58081).
91
OECD, 2019, Global Material Resources Outlook to 2060: Economic Drivers and Environmental Consequences, OECD publishing, Paris...
19
kom (2020) 0493 - Bilag 1: Kommissionens fremsynsrapport vedr. generelle, langsigtede tendenser – herunder nye muligheder og udfordringer – og EU’s strategiske interesser
2246291_0021.png
Trade and investment have plunged, undermining global prosperity and stability.
According to estimates, world trade volumes will drop by between 9% (IMF) and 32% (WTO)
in 2020, while foreign direct investment has decreased by 28.2% in the first half of 2020
compared to the same period in 2019
92
.
Europe’s economic sovereignty is at stake.
Other global powers are combining
geopolitical and economic interests to increase their influence in the world. This includes
protectionism, export control and the international role of currencies. While the international
role of the euro is rising, it is still far from challenging that of the US dollar. COVID-19 put
Europe’s industrial and corporate assets under
stress, which calls for protecting its economic
sovereignty through an integrated strategy
93
. Insolvencies due to the pandemic are exposing
the EU’s strategic industries to hostile foreign takeovers. This raises the chances of foreign
investors attempting to acquire strategic European assets, especially in the health, defence
and space supply chains
94
, as well as for critical infrastructures. To preserve EU companies
and critical assets, the EU’s openness to foreign investment needs to be balanced by the
appropriate tools
95
. The regulation on Foreign Direct Investment Screening
96
will help
safeguard Europe’s security and public order through a cooperation mechanism between the
Commission and the Member States to address concerns on incoming foreign direct
investment.
Foreign subsidies should also be addressed as they can distort the EU’s internal
market and undermine the level-playing field
97
.
The crisis accelerated attacks from authoritarian regimes against democratic
systems via misleading narratives.
The spread of mis- and disinformation and
conspiracy theories represents a threat to democracy
98
. Conspiracy theories about COVID-19
and the propagation of general vaccine hesitancy are continuing to put people’s lives at risk
99
.
Such ‘infodemics’
100
are both cause and consequence of rising distrust of governments and
media
101
, raising the pressure on the EU to protect more energetically the values it was built
on and step up efforts to defend democracy and the rule of law. The EU institutions are
contributing to the fight against mis- and disinformation
102
, thereby increasing democratic
resilience, which is at the core of the upcoming European Democracy Action Plan.
The drop refers to the number of deals regarding acquisition of equity stakes of at least 10% of the total capital between January and
June 2020 compared to 2019. The drop is -33.5% for intra-EU cross-border investments, and -23% for non-EU investments in Europe.
Source: JRC Foreign Investment Bulletin, July 2020, JRC 121392.
93
https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_20_528,https://www.bruegel.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/PC-
09_2019_final-1.pdf, https://peacediplomacy.org/2019/10/25/how-eu-can-achieve-economic-sovereignty/.
94
C(2020)1981 final, Guidance to the Member States concerning foreign direct investment and free movement of capital from third
countries, and the protection of Europe’s
strategic assets, ahead of the application of Regulation (EU) 2019/452 (FDI Screening Regulation).
95
Ibidem.
96
Regulation (EU) 2019/452 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 March 2019 establishing a framework for the screening
of foreign direct investments into the Union. The regulation will apply as from 11 October 2020.
97
COM(2020)253 final, White Paper on levelling the playing field as regards foreign subsidies.
98
JOIN(2020)8 final, Tackling COVID-19 disinformation - Getting the facts right; see also
https://euvsdisinfo.eu/eeas-special-report-
update-short-assessment-of-narratives-and-disinformation-around-the-COVID-19COVID-19-pandemic/.
99
A hoax about the connection of 5G, chipping and COVID-19 spread widely on social media (Downing, J., Ahmed, W., Vidal-Alaball, J. &
Lopez Seguí, F., 2020, Battling fake news and (in)security during COVID-19. E-International Relations).
100
Infodemics are the result of the simultaneous action of multiple human and non-human sources of fake or unreliable news
(https://arxiv.org/pdf/2004.03997.pdf).
101
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/2478.
102
https://www.europol.europa.eu/staying-safe-during-covid-19-what-you-need-to-know; https://ec.europa.eu/info/live-work-travel-
eu/health/coronavirus-response/fighting-disinformation_en.
92
20
kom (2020) 0493 - Bilag 1: Kommissionens fremsynsrapport vedr. generelle, langsigtede tendenser – herunder nye muligheder og udfordringer – og EU’s strategiske interesser
2246291_0022.png
Opportunities
The shift towards an increasingly multipolar world offers a new opportunity for
Europe to reinforce its role in the global order and lead the revival of multilateral
governance structures.
The globalisation process, which has temporarily slowed down, is
likely to resume once the crisis is over. At the same time,
glocalisation
combining global
business models with more consideration for localisation of production, consumption, and
taxation
offers renewed opportunities for the EU to position itself as a frontrunner and role
model to the world, provided the right conditions are in place (e.g. taxation, availability of
funding, standards).
Strong cooperation with like-minded democracies is increasingly important.
The EU
must protect the openness and democratic nature of its model, and needs to rally its partners
in these efforts, safeguarding its fundamental values from foreign interference. Upholding
democracy, human rights and the rule of law must start at home and should continue to be
the guiding principle of the EU’s external relations, including with regards to digital
technologies. Issue-based cooperation and partnerships with like-minded countries, and
other countries where possible, is an investment in multilateral governance and initiatives.
With its convening power, the EU can be a first-choice partner for countries around the world.
Boosting Europe’s open strategic autonomy is an imperative.
The crisis offers an
economic, social, and ecological opportunity to strengthen the EU’s resilience to future shocks
and secure its place in next-generation global value chains. As stated in the European
recovery plan, this means shaping global economic governance and developing mutually
beneficial bilateral relations, while protecting ourselves from unfair and abusive practices.
This is key to helping the EU diversify and solidify global supply chains in critical sectors,
intensifying ties with partners, including in Africa, re-shoring production where necessary,
developing substitutes through innovation, and increasing our strategic reserves
103
.
A reliable supply of food also needs to be ensured across the EU.
The Commission
will thus continue monitoring food security and competitiveness. It will further assess the
resilience of the food system and step up its coordination of a common European response
to crises. As the biggest importer and exporter of agri-food products, the EU will further
promote the global transition to sustainable food systems.
Being more strategic about raw materials is fundamental.
The EU must secure a
sustainable supply of critical raw materials. This means building diversified value chains,
decreasing dependence, raising circularity, supporting innovation for alternatives and
ensuring a greener and socially-responsible level playing field in the single market and
beyond. Key opportunities include the upcoming European Raw Materials Alliance
104
and the
EU Raw Materials Intelligence Capacity
105
, to explore these issues with industry and other
key stakeholders.
103
104
COM(2020)102 final, The new industrial strategy.
COM(2020)474 final, Critical Raw Materials Resilience: Charting a Path towards greater Security and Sustainability.
105
https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/bitstream/JRC109889/jrc109889_mica_jrc_technical_report_1.pdf.
21
kom (2020) 0493 - Bilag 1: Kommissionens fremsynsrapport vedr. generelle, langsigtede tendenser – herunder nye muligheder og udfordringer – og EU’s strategiske interesser
2246291_0023.png
A stable rules-based trading system and a level playing field are key objectives
for the EU.
Only a strong trade and investment policy can support the post-COVID-19
economic recovery, create jobs, protect EU companies from unfair practices at home and
abroad, and ensure coherence with broader priorities in the areas of sustainability, climate
change, the digital economy and security
106
. The current crisis may provide an opportunity to
drive meaningful reforms of the World Trade Organization (WTO) and build more
competitive, sustainable and resilient economies. The EU has already launched a health
initiative in the framework of the WTO to further support the global availability and provision
of essential health products. The EU is now in the process of reviewing its trade policy, in
view of strengthening its open strategic autonomy.
Industrial alliances can be at the forefront of this change, bringing together
investors, public institutions and industrial partners to help industry develop
strategic technologies.
This approach is already showing results in the areas of batteries
and hydrogen. In this context, a number of existing and forthcoming alliances
107
will help
Europe lead the green and digital transitions, maintain industrial leadership and benefit
European businesses and society while reinforcing Europe’s resilience.
Strategic foresight can be used to identify possible
scenarios for the EU’s place in
the future global order and chart the best path towards the desired future.
It can
help develop a forward-looking
analysis of how to leverage the EU’s power to support its
strategies for cooperation and partnerships. It also helps identify possible alliances, analyse
different ecosystems and assess risks, opportunities and future needs for strategic
industries. Moreover, foresight helps define strategic options for the best combination of
approaches to open strategic autonomy, from diversifying trading partners to strengthening
the EU’s own capacities.
3.3. The green dimension
Green resilience is about reaching climate neutrality by 2050, while mitigating and
adapting to climate change, reducing pollution and restoring the capacity of
ecological systems to sustain our ability to live well within planetary boundaries.
This entails eliminating our dependency on fossil fuels, reducing our impact on natural
resources, preserving biodiversity, developing a clean and circular economy, achieving a
toxic-free environment, changing lifestyles, production and consumption patterns, climate-
proofing infrastructure, creating new opportunities for healthy living, green business and
jobs, actively pursuing ecosystem restoration, as well as saving our seas and oceans.
106
107
https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_20_1058.
The European Battery Alliance, the Plastic Alliance, the European Clean Hydrogen Alliance, the European Alliance for Industrial Data and
Clouds and the European Raw Materials Alliance.
22
kom (2020) 0493 - Bilag 1: Kommissionens fremsynsrapport vedr. generelle, langsigtede tendenser – herunder nye muligheder og udfordringer – og EU’s strategiske interesser
2246291_0024.png
Capacities
The European Green Deal aims to achieve a climate-neutral society by 2050,
while
pursuing resilience to both mitigate and adapt to the impact of climate change,
environmental degradation and biodiversity loss. This
is an integral part of this Commission’s
strategy to implement the UN’s 2030 Agenda and the SDGs. It implies a full decarbonisation
of the power sector and a substantial electrification of energy demand. Land use emissions
need to be zeroed and the land use sink needs to be enhanced by restoring the environment
and adapting the farming sector, while ensuring a higher quality of life for everyone in the
EU in a cost-efficient manner so as to bring further economic growth and enable Europe to
act as a beacon
of transformation for the rest of the world. To pursue this path, the EU’s
capacities should be boosted to recover from the crisis and invest in long-term sustainability
(Box
3.2).
Box 3.2: Foresight scenarios for the EU 2050 climate
strategy & relevance for the Green Deal
The last two decades have witnessed 18 of the warmest years on record
1
. If temperatures
continue rising at just 0.2 °C per decade, the yearly damage from river floods in Europe
could increase from €5 billion to €112 billion and 16% of
the present Mediterranean
climate zone may become arid and non-productive by the end of the century. By 2050,
climate change, biodiversity loss and flooded coastal areas could force over 140 million
people to become internal migrants across Africa, South Asia and Latin America
1
.
The EU’s greenhouse gas emissions reduction strategy submitted to the United Nations
Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC)
1
, has been informed by
eight
scenarios with foresight dimensions
1
. The first five scenarios addressed the
well below
2°C
ambition, aiming at greenhouse gas emissions reduction levels in 2050 of around
80% compared to 1990. They considered differentiated portfolios of options for
decarbonisation and identified trade-offs: for example, pathways that focus more on
electrification for end-use
also need high deployment of storage (six times today’s levels)
to deal with variability in electricity production, but pathways which deploy more hydrogen
require more electricity to produce it in the first place
1
. Actions and technologies from the
first category’s five scenarios were combined into a sixth scenario (COMBO). This results
in net greenhouse gas emissions reduction in 2050 close to 90% compared to 1990, with
little reliance on negative emissions technologies and without changes to consumer
preferences.
Finally, the two last scenarios considered what is necessary for the EU to reach net zero
greenhouse gas emissions by 2050, thus doing its share in the global effort towards the
Paris Agreement’s goal to pursue efforts to limit temperature increase to 1.5°C compared
to pre-industrial levels. The seventh scenario looks at carbon capture and storage, and the
eighth scenario assumes a drive towards a more circular economy brought about by EU
business and consumption patterns. The latter includes a continuation of the trend towards
less carbon-intensive diets, the sharing economy in transport, the use of more sustainable
transport modes and more rational use of energy for heating and cooling.
The scenarios showed the portfolio of options mobilising existing and new technologies in
all economic sectors for Europe to be climate-neutral by 2050. While scenario work
continues to support the development of climate policy, the green transition requires all
23
kom (2020) 0493 - Bilag 1: Kommissionens fremsynsrapport vedr. generelle, langsigtede tendenser – herunder nye muligheder og udfordringer – og EU’s strategiske interesser
2246291_0025.png
hands on deck.
The European Green Deal has set up a transformative agenda built
around the following elements,
while being committed to mainstreaming sustainability
in all EU policies and to ensure a just transition:
1.
increasing the EU’s
climate ambitions for 2030 and 2050;
2.
supplying clean, affordable and secure energy;
3.
mobilising industry for a clean and circular economy;
4.
building and renovating in an energy- and resource-efficient way;
5.
accelerating the shift to sustainable and smart mobility;
6.
from ‘farm to fork’: a fair, healthy and environmentally-friendly
food system;
7. preserving and restoring ecosystems and biodiversity;
8. a zero pollution ambition for a toxic-free environment.
The EU’s regulatory power, notably in the
environmental field, can lead to the
highest standards being used to underpin competitive sustainability.
In recent
decades EU action has significantly improved not only the quality of Europe’s environment,
but also the lives of its citizens. In many areas, EU environmental standards have been
emulated by other countries. The EU was the first global region to pass binding legislation
to enshrine climate and energy targets and become a highly energy-efficient climate-neutral
economy
108
.
The EU is a global leader in the shift towards a clean and circular economy.
European consumers are an important force in this effort. According to the circular economy
action plan
109
, EU support should target priority value chains, while taking into consideration
sectors and business models with opportunities for job creation
110
. Circular economy
investments and policy tools (e.g. ecodesign
111
, energy labelling, green public procurement,
digitally-enabled circular business models, and the Eco-Management and Audit Scheme) will
help reduce overall environmental and climate footprints.
EU industrial frontrunners are demonstrating how clean, bio and circular
production and services are important drivers of competitiveness and growth.
Resource efficiency improvements, pollution prevention and control, water protection,
adoption of new circular business models, cleaner production, eco-innovation, and the
development of green markets are turning many European industries into global leaders. The
Commission aims to ensure consistency and synergies between environmental, climate,
energy and industrial policies
112
. This entails going beyond ‘punishing polluters’ to providing
a framework conducive to avoiding pollution and increasing energy and material efficiency.
Moreover, EU support to a sustainable
bioeconomy seeks the transformation of Europe’s
108
109
https://ec.europa.eu/clima/sites/clima/files/docs/factsheet_climate_change_2015_en.pdf.
https://ec.europa.eu/environment/circular-economy/pdf/new_circular_economy_action_plan.pdf.
110
https://ec.europa.eu/environment/circular-economy/pdf/leading_way_global_circular_economy.pdf.
111
It should be noted that up to 80% of products’ environmental impacts are determined at the design phase.
112
https://ec.europa.eu/environment/industry/.
24
kom (2020) 0493 - Bilag 1: Kommissionens fremsynsrapport vedr. generelle, langsigtede tendenser – herunder nye muligheder og udfordringer – og EU’s strategiske interesser
2246291_0026.png
agricultural and industrial base through the creation of new bio-based value chains, as well
as greener, more cost-effective industrial processes. It also enhances the overall status of
our natural resources and ecosystems. Bio-based industries could create a million new jobs
by 2030
113
.
The massive investment to assist the recovery will boost the green transition.
To
move towards a climate-neutral society and environmentally sustainable economy, there is
a need to pool funding sources at all levels. The EU budget and recovery package including,
among others, specific instruments like the Sustainable Europe Investment Plan
114
and the
Innovation Fund
115
aim to mobilise private and public resources over the next decade to
target climate, environmental and social investments related to the sustainable transition
116
.
The Commission is also preparing a renewed sustainable finance strategy, to create
sustainable investment opportunities and enhance sustainability-related risk management.
As stated by the European Council, 30% of the €1.82 trillion agreed under the 2021-2027
multiannual financial framework and Next Generation EU will go to climate-related
spending
117
. Funding in all areas must be based on the ‘do no harm’
principle
118
. The Just
Transition Mechanism, including the Just Transition Fund, will support Member States and
regions most affected by the transition towards climate neutrality
119
.
Europe’s blue economy plays an important role in contributing to resilience.
Preserving marine ecosystems is key to ensuring the future of maritime economic sectors.
In addition to natural resources for the economy, Europe’s oceans and seas provide a habitat
for marine life, carbon sequestration, renewable energy, and coastal protection against
climate change.
Vulnerabilities
Climate change is making extreme weather events more frequent and more
intense, including in Europe
120
. The global average temperature increases hide even more
extreme regional impacts. These range from unprecedented forest fires and heatwaves
above the Arctic Circle to increasingly devastating droughts in the Mediterranean region; and
from accelerating coastal erosion on the Atlantic coast to more severe flooding and
decimated forests in Central and Eastern Europe. All this comes with a terrible price tag
recent projections show that exposing the EU economy to global warming of 3°C would result
113
COM(2018)673 and SWD(2018)431, A sustainable Bioeconomy for Europe: Strengthening the connection between economy, society
and the environment; EuropaBio Report, 2016, Jobs and growth generated by industrial biotechnology in Europe.
114
https://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/innovation-fund_en.
115
https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/qanda_20_24.
116
https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/fs_20_48.
117
So-called
‘climate mainstreaming’.
See:
https://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/45109/210720-euco-final-conclusions-en.pdf.
118
The ‘do no harm’ principle means that no activity or
funding will undermine or counteract climate or environmental objectives.
119
https://ec.europa.eu/info/strategy/priorities-2019-2024/european-green-deal/actions-being-taken-eu/just-transition-mechanism/just-
transition-funding-sources_en.
120
The 2020 State of the European Environment report concludes that climate change has substantially increased the occurrence of
climate and weather extremes.
25
kom (2020) 0493 - Bilag 1: Kommissionens fremsynsrapport vedr. generelle, langsigtede tendenser – herunder nye muligheder og udfordringer – og EU’s strategiske interesser
2246291_0027.png
in an additional annual loss of at least €170 billion (1.36% of GDP) and would cost tens of
thousands of lives
121
.
Our current production and consumption model is increasingly exposing people and
the environment to the impact of hazardous substances.
Chemical pollution affects
health and the antibody response to vaccines
122
, increasing morbidity and mortality from
communicable diseases
123
. The world is failing to reach the agreed target for the sound
management of chemicals and waste
124
, while global chemical production is set to double
by 2030
125
, and the impact on people and the environment will be exacerbated without
adequate policy measures. In the European Green Deal, the Commission has committed to
move towards a toxic-free environment. This major goal will however require joint efforts by
all societal actors to promote a real shift towards safe and sustainable chemicals, as well
as a renewed global commitment.
Lower environmental protection standards and related costs in third countries may
push some polluting activities and waste outside the EU with a higher risk of
carbon leakage
126
. In addition, there are not always effective measures preventing exports
of toxic and pollutant waste to non-EU countries
127
. At the same time, the economic crisis
caused by COVID-19 risks intensifying these practices as countries seek to boost growth at
all costs. The EU should promote its values and standards internationally, which is key to
protecting its environmental norms, industries, workers and consumers. Otherwise, the EU is
likely to lose further competitiveness and fail to see a reduction in trade exports in polluting
sectors, while gaining comparative advantages in less polluting industries
128
.
The increasing exploitation of renewable and non-renewable natural resources
cannot be sustained,
as they are jeopardising prospects for future sustainable
development. Biodiversity loss on land and at sea, the rising extraction costs of minerals,
soil, water and air pollution
129
, as well as unrelenting greenhouse gas emissions from
unsustainable levels of consumption of raw materials, energy, water, food and land use, are
threatening the long-term livelihood of millions of people, including in Europe. Although the
pressure on nature has temporarily slowed down as a result of the economic downturn due
to confinement measures, the challenge in the future will be to decouple growth and
https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en/peseta-iv.
Epidemiological studies support the conclusion that PFOS and PFOA are associated with reduced antibody response to vaccination;
EFSA’s scientific opinion on PFAS
.
123
C&en, 2019,
Linking pollution and infectious disease;
Science Daily, 2 October 2019,
Environmental toxins impair immune system over
multiple generations.
Exposure to endocrine disruptors can damage the development of the endocrine, immune or neurological systems.
124
SDG 12.4, to be reached by 2020.
125
Global Chemical Outlook II, 2019.
126
Carbon leakage refers to the situation that may occur if, for reasons of costs related to climate policies, businesses were to transfer
production to other countries with laxer emission constraints.
127
Interpol Strategic Analyse Report, 2020, Emerging criminal trends in the global plastic waste market since January 2018
(https://www.interpol.int/News-and-Events/News/2020/INTERPOL-report-alerts-to-sharp-rise-in-plastic-waste-crime).
128
http://www.oecd.org/economy/greeneco/How-stringent-are-environmental-policies.pdf.
129
Exposure to air pollution can lead to adverse health effects, including respiratory and cardiovascular diseases. A number of health
authorities have warned that those citizens with certain pre-existing conditions, such as respiratory illnesses, may have an increased
vulnerability to COVID-19. However, at present it is not clear whether and to what extent ongoing exposure to air pollution might worsen
the condition of those infected by the virus. Further epidemiological research is needed (https://www.eea.europa.eu/themes/air/air-quality-
and-covid19).
122
121
26
kom (2020) 0493 - Bilag 1: Kommissionens fremsynsrapport vedr. generelle, langsigtede tendenser – herunder nye muligheder og udfordringer – og EU’s strategiske interesser
2246291_0028.png
wellbeing from consumption of natural resources and its resulting environmental impacts on
a long term basis.
COVID-19 appears to have spread more quickly in dense urban areas and poor
neighbourhoods.
Over 70% of Europe’s population live in cities; this number is expected to
increase to over 80% by 2050130. This translates into 36 million new urban dwellers, who
will need housing, employment and care, thereby increasing pressure on city infrastructure.
On the one hand, population density does facilitate the spread of diseases. On the other
hand, urban areas have capacities that some of their rural counterparts still lack, such as
proximity to healthcare facilities and digital infrastructure.
COVID-19 illustrates the connection between human development and the
environment.
Contemporary pandemics like COVID-19 and previous ones such as AIDS or
Ebola find their origin in humans encroaching on natural wildlife habitats and the destruction
of ecosystems
131
. This occurs due to environmental crime (e.g. logging and trade of exotic
species), some forms of farming, mining, and urbanisation, driven by resource-intensive
lifestyles.
Opportunities
The fast improvement of some environmental parameters resulting from the
confinement showed how resilient nature can be.
Nature-based solutions
132
, like green-
space initiatives and nature restauration plans, can contribute to the cost-effective
greenhouse gas emission reductions needed by 2030, while having numerous co-benefits
like flood protection, cooling during heatwaves and recreational use. Pollution reduction also
dramatically improves human health
133
. For the first time since the 1970s, the date at which
we will exceed the resources of the planet beyond the global sustainability rate has been
shifted backwards
134
. While many of the pollution reductions linked to the confinement are
likely to be only short-term, they do offer the opportunity to inform more long-term,
economically sustainable green transitions and more sustainable consumption patterns in
order to guarantee prosperity and health.
Using fewer primary resources in a circular economy benefits the environment and
the economy.
This includes resource efficiency measures and sustainable use of renewable
resources, circular business models and product policy. The new circular economy action plan
highlights the importance of these factors in delivering on our climate ambition by reducing
environmental footprints, the emission of greenhouse gases and other harmful substances,
and biodiversity loss. They are also key to creating business opportunities for the EU,
130
131
https://ec.europa.eu/research/environment/index.cfm?pg=nbs
.
Around 75% of all emerging infectious diseases cross over from wildlife to humans (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5711319/).
132
Nature-based solutions can pave the way to a more resource-efficient, competitive and greener economy and create new jobs and
economic growth by manufacturing and delivering new products and services that improve nature rather than depleting it
(https://ec.europa.eu/research/environment/index.cfm?pg=nbs).
133
https://www.ethicalcorp.com/wake-call-we-must-live-within-our-planetary-boundaries-avoid-future-pandemics.
134
https://www.overshootday.org.
27
kom (2020) 0493 - Bilag 1: Kommissionens fremsynsrapport vedr. generelle, langsigtede tendenser – herunder nye muligheder og udfordringer – og EU’s strategiske interesser
2246291_0029.png
facilitating market access, and decreasing our dependency on non-EU countries for raw
materials
135
.
COVID-19 has highlighted the importance of strengthening the resilience of urban
areas.
These are important hubs of innovation and key to making the most of the green
transition, which calls for reinforced participatory governance and collective engagement
towards a fairer and more sustainable future. Cooperation between EU institutions and cities,
as well as partner cities around the globe, has great potential to make Europe a world
reference point in identifying, experimenting with and applying solutions to current and
future challenges that cities will face, including those related to climate change. For
example, repurposing spaces like office buildings or brownfield sites provides abundant
opportunities for bringing nature back to cities and improving the wellbeing of people in the
urban environment, including through reconsidering mobility and consumption behaviours.
Strategic foresight can be used to analyse and identify potential areas for bottom-up
innovations and solutions to city problems, thus connecting those directly affected with
innovators, investors and start-ups
136
.
Box 3.3: CASE STUDY - Green jobs
The preservation or restoration of environmental quality is at the heart of many jobs of the
future.
These jobs will occur in agriculture, (re)manufacturing, construction, research and development,
administration and services. They include, for instance, sustainable food production and distribution,
green and efficient building, water quality and regeneration, green design, forestry, urban and landfill
mining, repair and recycling of raw materials, pharmaceuticals, low-emissions mobility and transport,
renewable energy, ocean acidity, and footprint managers. Resource constraints and the need for
increased efficiency will transform many professions, bringing in new business models and requiring
new skills.
Our environmental policies are contributing to a structural shift in the labour market.
Some
analyses estimate that a large proportion of EU jobs may evolve in a way that contributes to reducing
greenhouse gas emissions and addressing environmental degradation. Jobs in heavily polluting
industries represent a mere fraction of employment in the EU
137
and there are significant job
opportunities in reducing the impact of those industries. The eco-industry, which directly mitigates
environmental damage, is in itself becoming an important source of new jobs
138
. Moreover, increasing
material productivity (i.e. resource efficiency) drives labour intensity and value added products, hence
135
136
https://ec.europa.eu/environment/circular-economy/pdf/leading_way_global_circular_economy.pdf.
For example, the research project ‘The Future of Government 2030+’ by the Commission’s Joint Research Centre
explored changing
power relationships in society and new governance models and actors. The project examined stronger alliances of local governments
through new types of political institutions (such as the European Parliament of Mayors) and stronger inclusion of individuals in policymaking
through Citizen Councils. It has also proposed better synergies between the public and private sectors (especially the start-up culture)
(https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en/publication/eur-scientific-and-technical-research-reports/future-government-2030-policy-implications-and-
recommendations).
The Commission is also experimenting
with ‘doughnut economics’, as successfully tested at city level in Amsterdam
(https://www.kateraworth.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/20200416-AMS-portrait-EN-Spread-web-420x210mm.pdf).
137
https://ec.europa.eu/social/main.jsp?catId=738&langId=en&pubId=8219,https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en/publication/eur-scientific-and-
technical-research-reports/clean-energy-technologies-coal-regions.
138
The eco-industry comprises activities which produce goods and services to measure, prevent, limit, minimise or correct environmental
damage to water, air and soil, as well as problems related to waste, noise and eco-systems.
28
kom (2020) 0493 - Bilag 1: Kommissionens fremsynsrapport vedr. generelle, langsigtede tendenser – herunder nye muligheder og udfordringer – og EU’s strategiske interesser
2246291_0030.png
increasing employment opportunities. Europe is already a leader in innovation to improve material
productivity, but company-level and systemic inefficiencies persist.
The green sector can generate millions of jobs.
The eco-industry sector has grown by 20% since
2000 and provides around 4.2 million jobs in Europe, with a turnover of more than €700 billion. A shift
to a greener economy could create 24 million new jobs globally by 2030 if the right policies are put in
place, according to the International Labour Organisation (ILO)
139
, who also predicts that 72 million
full-time jobs will be lost by 2030 due to heat stress and temperature increases.
The recovery from the COVID-19 crisis suggests that the impact of green labour policies
could be significantly larger.
Given the number of people out of work, steering recovery plans
towards the green transition could result in far more green jobs than previously thought.
Job creation due to climate change policies will contribute to more inclusive job growth,
countering trends which can exacerbate labour market inequalities, such as automation, robotics and
artificial intelligence. By 2050, employment in the electricity sector is projected to grow by 25%
140
, as
industry, transport and other services become increasingly electrified. Renewable energy jobs in the EU
are expected to reach 2.7 million or 1.3% of EU employment by 2050
141
.
Effective green reskilling, especially for the built-in environment and services, can protect
middle class jobs.
The same is true with remanufacturing, reuse, repair, and recycling. Also, energy
production and energy-intensive sectors such as steel, cement, car manufacturing, machinery and
chemicals will need to shift to new production processes as part of the transition, which will also require
new skills.
Strategic foresight can help explore the drivers of change and individual and
collective behaviours and assumptions about the future in a participatory way.
More immediately, it can help understand future structural shifts in the labour market as
part of the transition towards a climate-neutral society by 2050. This will help guide the
reskilling of people who have lost their jobs during the COVID-19 crisis, or who are likely to
lose their jobs due to accelerated technological change and automation. Foresight also helps
scan the horizon for new developments, including emerging technologies that could either
accelerate or disrupt the green transition. The European Green Deal and a just transition will
require the active and coordinated contribution of all of society.
3.4. The digital dimension
Digital resilience is about ensuring that the way we live, work, learn, interact, and
think in this digital age preserves and enhances human dignity, freedom, equality,
security, democracy, and other European fundamental rights and values.
This is
increasingly important as hyperconnectivity continues to accelerate, with physical-digital
integration, the Internet of Things, smart home technology, the use of big data, augmented
ILO flagship report, World employment and social
outlook 2018 ‘Greening with Jobs’.
https://ec.europa.eu/social/main.jsp?catId=738&langId=en&pubId=8219.
141
https://www.irena.org/-/media/Files/IRENA/Agency/Publication/2020/Feb/IRENA_Transition_jobs_2020.pdf.
139
140
29
kom (2020) 0493 - Bilag 1: Kommissionens fremsynsrapport vedr. generelle, langsigtede tendenser – herunder nye muligheder og udfordringer – og EU’s strategiske interesser
2246291_0031.png
and virtual reality, machine learning, and other increasingly capable Artificial Intelligence
technologies. Digital technologies blur the distinction between the physical and virtual world,
and between humans, machines and nature, with implications for our own selves and the
policy frameworks
142
. They have been instrumental in keeping our economies and societies
running during the pandemic.
Capacities
Europe has a long and successful history of technological and societal innovation
and cooperation.
The EU is stronger when it works together with Member States, involving
regions and municipalities, academia, civil society, financial institutions, firms, and social
enterprises. Recent agreements in areas such as high-performance computing
143
and
microelectronics
144
have reaffirmed this capacity. Continuing to promote the digital
transformation of public administrations and justice systems throughout Europe is also
crucial to support this process
145
.
Europe has unique capacities to shape international standards on privacy and data
flows.
The European General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) established data protection
rules for all firms and actors processing the data of individuals in the EU, offering people
more control over their personal data and benefits to businesses through a level playing
field
146
. The role of the EU as a rule-maker in the digital sphere is being reinforced through
engagement with non-EU countries that are currently adopting or modernising data
protection legislation. India has followed the example of the EU GDPR in creating a plan for
a Personal Data Protection Bill
147
. The California Consumer Privacy Act went in a similar
direction
148
. Europe now needs to continue building alliances and maximising its regulatory
power, support for structural improvements, diplomacy and finance to promote the European
digital model
149
.
Vulnerabilities
Sophisticated hybrid attacks by state and non-state actors threaten our
cybersecurity and democracy.
Vulnerabilities within the EU have been exploited through
a combination of cyberattacks and cybercrime that have resulted in damage to critical
infrastructure
150
. There has been a significant increase in the number of cyberattacks
reported against supercomputers, healthcare and financial systems
151
, such as hacking
sensitive research from medical organisations and pharmaceutical companies
152
. ICT threats
142
143
Online Manifesto (https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/sites/digital-agenda/files/Manifesto.pdf).
https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/eurohpc-joint-undertaking, https://eurohpc-ju.europa.eu/.
144
https://www.ipcei-me.eu/, https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/ecsel.
145
https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/communication-shaping-europes-digital-future-feb2020_en_4.pdf.
146
https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/law-topic/data-protection_en.
147
https://hbr.org/2019/12/how-india-plans-to-protect-consumer-data.
148
EIT Report, European Digital Infrastructure and Data Sovereignty (https://www.eitdigital.eu/fileadmin/files/2020/publications/data-
sovereignty/EIT-Digital-Data-Sovereignty-Summary-Report.pdf).
149
https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_20_273.
150
Critical infrastructures are essential for vital societal functions, such as health, safety, security and economic or social wellbeing, whose
disruption/destruction has a significant impact (Council Directive 2008/114/EC).
151
https://www2.deloitte.com/ng/en/pages/risk/articles/covid-19-impact-cybersecurity.html.
152
Craglia, M.
et al.,
2020, Artificial Intelligence and Digital Transformation: early lessons from the COVID-19 crisis. JRC Science for Policy
Report, JRC121305.
30
kom (2020) 0493 - Bilag 1: Kommissionens fremsynsrapport vedr. generelle, langsigtede tendenser – herunder nye muligheder og udfordringer – og EU’s strategiske interesser
2246291_0032.png
have also been flagged as a key source of systemic risk to electoral processes and the EU
financial system
153
. These events show a worrying acceleration towards asymmetrical virtual
crime
154
. Cybercrime, for example online dissemination of child sexual abuse material, has
also reached unprecedented heights
155
.
The rapidly escalating US-China technological confrontation is disrupting global
digital supply chains.
It will have a direct impact on the single market and reinforce the
need for the EU to pursue its technological sovereignty agenda and strengthen its key digital
capacities.
The digital divide between urban and rural areas is a cause for concern.
In 2019,
the coverage of Next Generation Access (NGA) networks, able to deliver download speeds of
at least 30 Mbps, increased to 86% of households. Fixed Very High Capacity networks
(VHCNs), able to provide at least gigabit connectivity, were available to 44% of households.
However, in rural areas NGA coverage stood at only 59% in 2019, while VHCNs reach just
20% of households. This confirms that more investment is needed in rural areas to close the
gap. Development of digital capacities in rural areas will considerably increase their
attractiveness.
The crisis revealed a lack of readiness in the data economy.
There was a significant
lack of almost all types of data on which models are built (such as employment, consumer
confidence, and production data), together with delays in producing data
156
. Data on stock,
production capacity, and demand for key supplies like personal protective equipment was
missing
157
, and data on cases of COVID-19 infections was collected differently throughout
Europe. This demonstrated that we still need a significant leap forward on data collection
and governance for economic and societal benefits. In turn, this calls
for a ‘European way’
of governing the use of data, not least to avoid data monopolies
158
.
Digital technologies and related business models, including Artificial Intelligence
(AI) and the platform economy, will impact the job market.
While the interplay
between potential job obsolescence and creation caused by AI and robotics is still unclear
159
,
it is evident that these and other digital technologies
160
, as well as related business models,
will change the way we work. Issues such as health, work-life balance, and safety at work
will be impacted
161
. Demand for skills in emerging technologies such as AI, high-performance
https://www.esrb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/reports/esrb.report200219_systemiccyberrisk~101a09685e.en.pdf.
The megatrend
‘changing security paradigm’
(https://ec.europa.eu/knowledge4policy/changing-security-paradigm_en) is accelerating.
155
COM(2020)605 final, EU Security Union Strategy; COM(2020)607 final, EU strategy for a more effective fight against child sexual
abuse.
156
https://www2.deloitte.com/be/en/pages/strategy-operations/articles/covid-19-and-data-economy.html.
157
The Commission set up a clearing house for medical equipment to address market failures and facilitate the timely availability of
supplies
during
the
pandemic
(https://ec.europa.eu/info/live-work-travel-eu/health/coronavirus-response/emergency-support-
instrument/covid-19-clearing-house-medical-equipment_en).
158
Duch-Brown, Martens and Mueller-Langer, 2017, The economics of ownership, access and trade in digital data, JRC Working Papers on
Digital Economy 2017-01, Joint Research Centre (https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/sites/jrcsh/files/jrc104756.pdf); Crémer, J., Y-A de Montjoye and
H. Schweitzer, 2019, Competition policy for the digital era, Report for Commissioner Vestager, European Commission.
159
https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/future-work-work-future.
160
With global quantum race ongoing, the investment levels in Europe are still below those of the other major global players.
161
https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/research_and_innovation/ege/ege_future-of-work_opinion_122018.pdf;
https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/final-report-high-level-expert-group-impact-digital-transformation-eu-labour-markets.
154
153
31
kom (2020) 0493 - Bilag 1: Kommissionens fremsynsrapport vedr. generelle, langsigtede tendenser – herunder nye muligheder og udfordringer – og EU’s strategiske interesser
2246291_0033.png
computing and whole-of-society cybersecurity
162
are very acute, and the problem is growing
as the offer lags behind market demand. Levels of preparedness and awareness are also
unequal across the EU.
Opportunities
The COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated hyperconnectivity
163
. There is an opportunity
to draw lessons from this real-time experience and achieve a balance between physical and
digital
interactions in the future that meets the public’s expectations. During the COVID-19
crisis, over one-third
of the EU’s labour force temporarily shifted to teleworking
arrangements
164
. Connectivity increased in all areas
165
and the spectacular rise in internet
traffic, estimated at between 10% and 30% worldwide
166
, remained even as countries
relaxed confinement measures. The total amount of data generated worldwide is estimated
to grow to around 175 billion terabytes by 2025.
Digital technologies could contribute to further advances in healthcare.
AI and high-
performance computing have the potential to accelerate the development of treatments,
vaccines and diagnostics, predict the spread of diseases and plan the distribution of medical
resources
167
. Such innovations could also be used to analyse individual health risks for
preventive medicine. Leveraging AI also brings opportunities for enhancing our defences
against cyberattacks, notably against critical infrastructure such as hospitals.
Digital technologies have enabled some continuity in training and education while
schools have been closed during the crisis.
When used properly, digital technologies can
increase the effectiveness, efficiency and inclusiveness of our education and training
systems. Strengthening the digital capacities of education and training systems and bridging
digital gaps in equipment and connectivity is key.
Addressing challenges associated with the implementation of the EU data strategy
will open up wide-ranging opportunities for Europe.
These include the promotion of
the EU data protection model, the possibility to improve data availability, reuse,
interoperability and governance, and the ability to avoid inadequate data infrastructures, as
well as rely on adequate tools that can empower individuals to exercise their rights.
Open strategic autonomy is key to develop the European digital economy.
5G
connectivity, in combination with the Internet of Things, could boost the digitalisation of
services (e.g. energy, transport, banking, and health) and processes, reduce costs and
increase efficiency. The creation of a cloud infrastructure would be the first step to making
162
Nai Fovino I.,
et al.
(eds), 2020, Cybersecurity, our digital anchor, Science for Policy Report, Joint Research Centre
(https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en/facts4eufuture/cybersecurity-our-digital-anchor).
163
The megatrend ‘accelerating technological change and hyperconnectivity’ (https://ec.europa.eu/knowledge4policy/accelerating-
technological-change-hyperconnectivity_en)
has accelerated.
164
https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/sites/default/files/ef_publication/field_ef_document/ef20058en.pdf.
165
Netflix doubled its paid subscriptions globally, with an additional 15.7 million subscribers (which is believed to be temporary) by April
2020 (https://orbi.uliege.be/bitstream/2268/247652/1/MAY-2020-_-N%C2%BA4.pdf).
166
https://www.forbes.com/sites/markbeech/2020/03/25/covid-19-pushes-up-internet-use-70-streaming-more-than-12-first-figures-
reveal/#4ba355cd3104.
167
For instance, the EU-funded consortium
Exscalate 4CoV
uses one of the world's most powerful high-performance computing platforms
to screen the potential impact of known molecules against the genomic structure of coronavirus.
32
kom (2020) 0493 - Bilag 1: Kommissionens fremsynsrapport vedr. generelle, langsigtede tendenser – herunder nye muligheder og udfordringer – og EU’s strategiske interesser
2246291_0034.png
the most of data generated in Europe
168
. Concerted legislative and financial support for the
creation of a single market for data, based on the deployment of common European data
spaces, will ensure better access to data and bring benefits for the public and the growth of
the European data economy
169
.
Digital technologies can contribute to greening the economy.
They can optimise the
operation of utilities, mobility and transport, products, industrial processes and buildings and
other assets, leading to energy savings, pollution reduction and increased resource efficiency
by enabling the transition to a circular economy. They can also improve environmental and
risk management through early warning systems for extreme weather events, based on, for
instance, earth observation data and big data technologies. However, attention needs to be
paid to the energy consumption of data technologies and the short life span of digital devices
that makes e-waste, including critical raw materials, the fastest growing waste category
170
.
There is a fundamental shift to decentralised data systems brought by edge
171
and fog
172
computing, combined with the deployment and uptake of new mobile generation
technologies (e.g. 5G and 6G in the future) and low energy processors that can curb the
growing energy consumption of digital technologies by processing data closer to users,
through applications related to the Internet of Things, and by reducing network latency.
Strategic foresight can foster the human-centric shaping and appropriation of digital
technologies, as well as their effectiveness in boosting overall sustainability. This includes
anticipating how technologies could develop and ways to seize underlying and upcoming
opportunities. It also means exploring how digital technologies impact all walks of life and
bring new challenges, such as dealing with an increasing flow of information and the artificial
soliciting of human attention. It can help identify how the EU can shape global digital
standards and rules to the benefit of people and businesses while also greening the
economy. To respect fundamental rights and EU values and create the necessary trust for
citizens to uptake AI technologies, a horizontal framework on AI is needed. With foresight
and anticipation, it is possible to explore how digital technologies can effectively enable
governments to provide universal access to quality basic services, and how to make
institutions fully accountable. It can explore ways to deploy secure digital infrastructures
(high speed networks including future 6G, cloud and data) to avoid a digital divide between
regions and individuals.
https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-
explained/index.php?title=File:Degree_of_dependence_on_cloud_computing,_by_economic_activity,_EU-
28,_2018_(%25_of_enterprises_using_the_cloud).png&oldid=415896.
169
COM(2017)9 final, Building a European Data Economy.
170
For example, people in northern Europe produced the most e-waste
22.4kg per person in 2019. The amount was half as much in Eastern
Europe. Europe had the highest recycling rate in 2019, at 42%, with Asia second at 12%.
(https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2020/jul/02/10bn-precious-metals-dumped-each-year-electronic-waste-un-toxic-e-waste-
polluting).
171
This brings processing close to the data source and it does not need to be sent to a remote cloud or other centralised system. By
eliminating the distance and time it takes to send data to centralised sources, it can improve the speed and performance of data transport,
as well as devices and applications on the edge.
172
This is a standard that defines how edge computing should work and it facilitates the operation of computing, storage and networking
services between end devices and cloud computing data centres. In data centres, fog is often used as a jumping-off point for edge
computing.
168
33
kom (2020) 0493 - Bilag 1: Kommissionens fremsynsrapport vedr. generelle, langsigtede tendenser – herunder nye muligheder og udfordringer – og EU’s strategiske interesser
2246291_0035.png
Box 3.4: CASE STUDY - Green ICT
Are the
EU’s green and digital ambitions always complementary?
Information and
communication technologies (ICT) can fuel unsustainable consumption, but with the right policy
framework they also hold great promise for reducing energy consumption and optimising resource,
product and asset use. Digital technologies could help reduce global emissions by up to 15% through
innovative solutions in areas including energy, manufacturing, agriculture and land use, buildings,
services, transportation, and traffic management
173
. For instance, transferring and storing one gigabyte
of data through the internet uses between 3.1 kWh and 7 kWh, instead of 0.000005 kWh if done
locally
174
. This calls for the establishment of interoperable European cloud and edge infrastructures
that can accommodate large-scale
digital solutions in Europe while ensuring the EU’s technological
sovereignty.
However, digitalisation could negatively affect the environment, climate and human health
via higher production, use and disposal of electronic equipment, and data centres
175
. For example, the
energy consumption from mining bitcoins is estimated to be responsible for 0.3% of global energy
consumption. This might not sound like much, but 68.11 TWh per year is higher than the annual
consumption of Austria (64.60 TWh) and Czechia (62.34 TWh)
176
.
Material efficiency is an important challenge to address.
Every year, $10 billion worth of gold,
platinum and other precious metals is dumped in the growing mountain of electronic waste. Material
efficiency of digital technologies might have an even larger environmental impact than energy
efficiency.
Energy consumption of computing is growing at an unsustainable rate.
Newer generations of
wireless technologies are less energy consuming than earlier ones (e.g. 5G antennas are set to
consume less than the 4G ones
177
). However, the fact that 5G will bring denser networks and the rising
number of devices connected via 5G (e.g. connected and autonomous driving)
178
might lead to an
overall growth of energy consumption, at least in the
first years of deployment. The tech sector’s
estimated global footprint in 2020 is comparable to that of the aviation industry
179
.
This highlights the growing need to continue working on greening ICT.
Therefore, there is a
need to further consider ways to rapidly reverse the rising energy and material resource consumption
of Europe’s digital technologies and infrastructures while ensuring that they are available for
applications required for climate action, health, sustainability and resilience.
Greening ICT should be done within the framework of the circular economy,
including building
local material and digital ecosystems enabling innovative product designs and business models.
https://exponentialroadmap.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Exponential-Climate-Action-Roadmap-September-2018.pdf.
https://medium.com/stanford-magazine/carbon-and-the-cloud-d6f481b79dfe.
175
The EU Environmental Foresight System (FORENV) cycle: Emerging issues at the environment-social interface.
176
Cambridge Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index (https://www.cbeci.org).
177
https://www.ericsson.com/en/blog/2019/9/energy-consumption-5g-nr;
https://hellofuture.orange.com/en/5g-energy-efficiency-by-
design/.
178
AI Now Institute (https://ainowinstitute.org/AI_Now_2019_Report.pdf).
179
Data centres will make up 45% of this footprint (up from 33% in 2010) and network infrastructure 24%. See:
Belkhir and Elmeligi,
2018,
AI and Climate Change: How they’re connected, and what we can do about it (https://medium.com/@AINowInstitute/ai-and-climate-
change-how-theyre-connected-and-what-we-can-do-about-it-6aa8d0f5b32c).
174
173
34
kom (2020) 0493 - Bilag 1: Kommissionens fremsynsrapport vedr. generelle, langsigtede tendenser – herunder nye muligheder og udfordringer – og EU’s strategiske interesser
2246291_0036.png
4. Strategic foresight agenda
4.1 Monitoring resilience
As resilience becomes a new compass for EU policymaking, proper monitoring tools
are required.
This Communication suggests moving towards
resilience dashboards
and co-
creating them in exploratory discussions with Member States and key stakeholders. It
presents here prototypes. The purpose of these prototypes, in view of more detailed analysis,
is to highlight vulnerabilities and resilience capacities in the EU and its Member States. These
dashboards will need further work, building on existing threads and collective intelligence.
The list of dashboard indicators will be dynamic and chosen based on a participatory process
involving Member States and key stakeholders, relying on quality data comparable across
Member States and over time.
The resilience dashboards will be complementary and will add value to other
monitoring tools.
They will draw upon existing sectoral indicators and monitoring tools,
such as the Social Scoreboard and the Monitoring report on progress towards the SDGs in an
EU context
180
. They will provide clear added value through the following specificities: (i) the
dashboards will be informed by strategic foresight, helping to identify emerging issues and
challenges and propose new forward-looking indicators of vulnerabilities or resilience
capacities; (ii) while existing tools aim to assess progress in the EU and its Member States,
for instance along the transitions or in specific sectoral policies, the dashboards will assess
resilience, i.e.
the ability
to make progress and reach policy targets; and (iii) while many
existing tools tend to be sectoral or focus on single topics or policies, the dashboards will
focus on multiple dimensions of resilience and their interlinkages, providing a holistic picture.
4.1.1 Prototype resilience dashboards
This Communication proposes to develop prototype dashboards for the social and
economic, geopolitical, green, and digital dimensions of resilience.
What is presented
below as an example is a preliminary and yet-to-be-finalised set of indicators of
vulnerabilities
and
resilience capacities
at EU and Member States level based on publicly
available data
181
.
The illustrative prototypes provide an example of the look and feel
of such a dashboard.
For each variable, a scale of three colours indicates the countries’
relative situation in the last year for which data is available versus the pooled values of
available data since 2007
182
. Colours are assigned based on the distance from the mean of
the underlying distribution
183
.
https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-statistical-books/-/KS-02-20-202.
The complete list of indicators, corresponding definitions, and sources are available in the following technical papers of 9 September
2020
from the Commission’s Joint Research Centre (JRC): (i) ‘Prototype
dashboard for monitoring the social and economic dimension of
resilience’,
JRC121729; (ii)
‘Prototype
dashboards for monitoring the geopolitical, green, and digital dimensions of resilience’, JRC121633.
182
Data availability may vary between countries from year to year and countries with longer data series are more prominent in the
distribution. If no data is available for a variable at the beginning of the period, the 2007-2019 distribution automatically refers to the
latest available values. If variables are available only for a single year, relative performance is assessed only for that year.
183
For each indicator, the mean and standard deviation are calculated for the pooled distribution across countries and years. Yellow/blue
indicates countries that, in the latest available year, perform at least one standard deviation worse/better than the average. Light blue
refers to the intermediate range.
181
180
35
kom (2020) 0493 - Bilag 1: Kommissionens fremsynsrapport vedr. generelle, langsigtede tendenser – herunder nye muligheder og udfordringer – og EU’s strategiske interesser
2246291_0037.png
The illustrative prototype dashboard for social and economic resilience looks at
social, economic, and health issues in connection with COVID-19. Figure 4.1
184
gives
a sense of relative vulnerabilities, resilience capacities, and common patterns in the EU and
its Member States. For example, in this preliminary work, population ageing and rising travel
in the pre-crisis period appear as common vulnerabilities.
Figure 4.1
Prototype dashboard for social and economic resilience linked to the COVID-19
crisis
The illustrative prototype dashboard for the geopolitical dimension of resilience
focuses on raw materials.
A secure supply of raw materials is a prerequisite for a resilient
economy. A prototype dashboard, presented in the top panel of
Figure 4.2
185
, has been
prepared to give a sense of Member States’
relative vulnerabilities and capacities in relation
184
Sources include Eurostat and the Commission, complemented by variables from JRC's LUISA territorial platform, the European Institute
for Gender Equality, the Global Competitiveness Index of the World Economic Forum, the World Bank, the European Quality of Life Survey,
Eurobarometer and research (https://www.eurosurveillance.org/content/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2018.23.46.1800516).
185
The starting points are the Raw Materials Scoreboard 2018 (https://ec.europa.eu/growth/content/raw-materials-scoreboard-2018_en)
and the methodology of the criticality assessment (Blengini
et al.,
2017,
https://doi.org/10.2760/73303).
Sources include the Commission,
the World Mining Database, the British Geological Survey’s World Mineral Production database, and the US Geological Survey’s
historical
statistics.
36
kom (2020) 0493 - Bilag 1: Kommissionens fremsynsrapport vedr. generelle, langsigtede tendenser – herunder nye muligheder og udfordringer – og EU’s strategiske interesser
2246291_0038.png
to raw materials supply. At this stage, there is no possibility to reflect the economic structure
of individual Member States in the prototype, which is a significant limitation. Nevertheless,
as an example, the dashboard indicates that many countries fare well in relative terms with
respect to import dependence of base metals, but less so to import dependence of non-
metallic minerals for construction
186
. Among capacities, the spending on innovation in
material sectors is a strong point in many countries.
Figure 4.2
Prototype dashboards for the geopolitical, green, and digital dimensions of
resilience
The illustrative prototype dashboard for the green dimension of resilience focuses
on climate change and the environment.
It is presented in the middle panel of
Figure
4.2
187
. In this illustrative example, indicators like the share of population covered by the
Covenant of Mayors and the size of Natura 2000 protected areas provide a relatively positive
picture for many countries. By contrast, water exploitation, biodiversity loss, greenhouse gas
186
187
In absolute terms, however, import dependence of base metals is higher than for non-metallic minerals.
The starting point is the index of the EU Global Climate Change Alliance (Miola
et al.,
2015,
https://doi.org/10.2788/516387),
complemented with additional variables describing Member States’ efforts and achievements towards climate adaptation and mitigation.
Data sources include the World Bank, the FAO, the European Environmental Agency, and the Emergency Events Database of the Centre for
Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters (EM-DAT), the data collections of various research institutions, Eurobarometer and Eurostat.
37
kom (2020) 0493 - Bilag 1: Kommissionens fremsynsrapport vedr. generelle, langsigtede tendenser – herunder nye muligheder og udfordringer – og EU’s strategiske interesser
2246291_0039.png
absorption by ecosystems, public expenditure on environmental protection and the frequency
and fatality of floods, storms and wildfires highlight potential weaknesses.
A digital resilience dashboard could be further developed starting from the Digital
Economy and Society Index (DESI).
The bottom panel of
Figure 4.2
presents a set of
DESI indicators of digital resilience capacities, like e-governance and digital skills. They are
complemented with others whose importance was highlighted by the COVID-19 crisis, like
teleworking and e-health. According to these indicators, many countries show strong
capacities in e-government and the overall digital economy reflecting improving penetration
and adoption of new technologies. At the same time, digital skills, teleworking capacities and
the use of e-health show a more contrasted picture.
4.1.2 Work ahead for monitoring resilience
The prototype dashboards are presented as an example. In cooperation with
Member States and other key stakeholders, the Commission will develop the
resilience dashboards further in a forward-looking perspective.
The dashboards will
be informed by strategic foresight, which can help identify emerging challenges and propose
new forward-looking indicators to assess vulnerabilities or capacities. As resilience is a
characteristic that must be enhanced over time, the focus of this work will be on the medium-
to-long term, to give the best conditions for foresight-informed policies to mitigate
vulnerabilities and strengthen capacities. This will take into account the impact of
megatrends and anticipated risks. For instance, the dashboard for social and economic
resilience would be broadened beyond the COVID-19 context, in close connection with the
Social Scoreboard. Moreover, broader issues such as trade, including value chains, security,
and other aspects of foreign policy such as international cooperation could be considered for
a more comprehensive geopolitical dashboard. For the green resilience dashboard, issues
beyond climate change, such as the preservation of natural resources, the impact of
pollution, water and soil quality, the role of ecosystem services or job reallocation and
innovation prompted by the green transition, could also be contemplated. The utmost
attention will be paid to ensure consistency and coherence with existing EU monitoring
systems under development in the context of the European Green Deal. A digital resilience
dashboard should be used to identify digital technology areas where the strategic autonomy
of the EU is at risk and where investments should be targeted. In addition, strategic foresight
could be used to adjust the list of indicators to include for instance necessary skills or
vulnerabilities linked to the widespread use of future technologies such as AI
188
, the number
of jobs at risk as a result of increasing automation, or new jobs that could be created by the
implied shift towards personal services.
Aggregate indicators at EU level and a synthetic resilience index could also be
envisaged.
Building on the resilience dashboards, as well as existing knowledge and
indicators, future discussions with key stakeholders will aim to develop these indicators at
A leading source is the Commission’s
AI Watch
initiative (https://ec.europa.eu/knowledge4policy/ai-watch_en), monitoring industrial,
technological and research capacity, uptake and technical development of Artificial Intelligence and its impact on the economy and society.
188
38
kom (2020) 0493 - Bilag 1: Kommissionens fremsynsrapport vedr. generelle, langsigtede tendenser – herunder nye muligheder og udfordringer – og EU’s strategiske interesser
2246291_0040.png
EU level and explore the feasibility of a synthetic resilience index. Its rationale would be
similar to the logic underlying the work on the forthcoming
Transition Performance Index
189
.
This exploratory work could follow a participatory process. An EU-wide approach, combined
with the snapshot provided by the index, would complement the more comprehensive view
provided by the underlying resilience dashboards.
This broad approach to measuring and monitoring resilience should feed into an
integrated approach to measuring people’s wellbeing.
The COVID-19 crisis has called
into question our ordering of priorities and reignited the public debate on the importance of
many aspects of the quality and sustainability of human life, such as education, income, jobs
and health
190
. Since the 2007 Istanbul Declaration on Measuring Social Progress and the
2009 report of the Stiglitz-Sen-Fitoussi Commission, there has been a strong consensus in
the international community on the need to go beyond conventional economic measures like
gross domestic product (GDP), to make wellbeing a policy target for the generation of today
as well as tomorrow
191,192
. The ‘Beyond GDP’ initiative has led to the creation of major
international measurement frameworks
193
and efforts by countries to develop similar,
sometimes highly elaborate systems of national objectives, targets and measurement
schemes. The Commission supports this paradigm shift and takes a similarly comprehensive
approach, acknowledging the complex interaction among social, economic and
environmental systems influencing resilience and its importance for measuring wellbeing
and sustainability
194
.
4.2 Horizontal foresight activities to foster effective EU
transition-led policies
Strategic foresight will be applied to bring a dynamic and forward-looking
perspective of synergies and trade-offs among various EU policy goals and
policies, leading to a coherent strategic approach.
This can provide relevant input for
surveillance and governance processes, particularly multidisciplinary and periodic ones like
the European Semester and SDGs monitoring. By supporting a systemic understanding of
the strategic objectives across policy areas, strategic foresight can be used to provide a
dynamic analysis of synergies and trade-offs between them and across time horizons.
Strategic foresight should contribute to testing and strengthening the coherence of the
The Commission is exploring the possibility of measuring the transition to sustainability by way of a scoreboard. Based on the annual
monitoring reports from Eurostat, this scoreboard would provide an internationally comparable overview of all four dimensions of
sustainability (economic, environmental, social and institutional), with the aim of encouraging a broad public debate throughout the EU.
190
Gadredy, J., Jany-Catrice, F.,
et al.,
2020, Se libérer du PIB pour mesurer ce qui compte vraiment, Le Monde.
191
See: the first Stiglitz-Sen-Fitoussi Report from 2009 (https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/8131721/8131772/Stiglitz-Sen-Fitoussi-
Commission-report.pdf);
COM(2009)433 final, GDP and beyond: measuring progress in a changing world; SWD(2013)303 final, Progress
on ‘GDP and beyond’ actions;
and the two volumes of the second Stiglitz-Fitoussi-Durand report from 2018
(https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264307292-en and
https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264307278-en).
192
The high-level
conference ‘Beyond GDP’, hosted by the
Commission, the European Parliament, the Club of Rome, the OECD and the
WWF in 2007 focused attention on the most appropriate indices to measure progress, and how these can best be integrated into the
decision-making process. Méda, D., 2020, Promouvoir de
nouveaux indicateurs de richesse: ‘histoire d’une cause inaboutie’, Fondation
maison des sciences de l’homme, Coll ge d’ tudes mondiales; and Durand, M. and Exton, C., 2019, Adopting a Well-Being
Approach in
Central Government: Policy Mechanisms and Practical Tools, Chapter 8 of the Global Happiness and Wellbeing Policy Report, OECD.
193
Leading examples are the OECD Better Life Index and the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals and Human Development
Index.
194
De Smedt, M., Giovannini, E. and Radermacher, W.J., 2018, Chapter 9: Measuring sustainability, in Stiglitz J.E., Fitoussi Jean-Paul, Durand
Martine (Eds.), 2018, For Good Measure: Advancing Research on Well-being Metrics Beyond GDP, OECD Publishing, Paris, pp. 241-276,
(https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264307278-11-en).
189
39
kom (2020) 0493 - Bilag 1: Kommissionens fremsynsrapport vedr. generelle, langsigtede tendenser – herunder nye muligheder og udfordringer – og EU’s strategiske interesser
2246291_0041.png
Commission’s monitoring, forecasting and modelling capacities.
Currently, different
indicators and scoreboards are used across the Commission to serve various policy goals.
The Commission also relies on expert-based forecasts and a wide range of models. A review
and assessment of existing monitoring tools could identify where and how coherence can be
improved.
Strategic foresight will help enhance resilience.
This Communication starts to show
how the impact of COVID-19
on megatrends can shed a new dynamic light on Europe’s
evolving resilience. Work will continue on this forward-looking task. As part of this, the
Commission is proposing to develop a set of shared
reference foresight scenarios
as a
robust forward-looking framework. These scenarios will help identify potential pathways for
the twin transition.
They
will: (i) provide a reference for debating shared or alternative visions
of preferred futures amongst leaders; (ii) help ensure coherence across policies; and (iii)
serve as a common forward-looking framework for stress-testing policy proposals or
launching
ex ante
impact assessments. This exercise can also contribute to the Conference
on the Future of Europe.
4.3 Thematic strategic foresight agenda
The EU strategic foresight agenda will address cross-cutting topics where
strategic foresight can deepen our understanding of the dynamics at play across
policy tracks.
Among the high-impact topics identified, the Commission will next explore:
Open strategic autonomy:
to secure Europe’s competitiveness and global
leadership in the future and strengthen its resilience, strategic foresight could help
explore scenarios for a new global order and the EU’s place in it, as well as the
capacities needed to match its ambitions. This could include defining pathways for
achieving the twin transitions and the pace with which they can be achieved, mapping
critical emerging technologies, sectors and products, and options for new industrial
alliances and diversification of trading partners. In this context, foresight could
inter
alia
allow horizon scanning, including as regards international standardisation, to be
used as a strategic lever by the EU. Possible future work on this topic would also need
to be seen in light of the forthcoming review of the EU’s trade policy that will identify
its contribution to open strategic autonomy.
The future of jobs and skills for and in the green transition:
As acknowledged
in the European Skills Agenda, the green transition requires a major shift and
reallocation of jobs and skills, in a wide range of sectors and public services. A
systemic view of the shifts in the labour market driven by the green transition is still
missing. Foresight could explore the means by which such a systemic view could be
developed, integrating also the lessons that can be learned from previous industrial
transitions. Such a view will inform the strategies for reskilling and accompanying
people, whose jobs are transformed or lost due to the industrial transition. This is
40
kom (2020) 0493 - Bilag 1: Kommissionens fremsynsrapport vedr. generelle, langsigtede tendenser – herunder nye muligheder og udfordringer – og EU’s strategiske interesser
2246291_0042.png
also important to guide the
EU’s future priorities for education, lifelong learning and
legal migration pathways, as well as to ensure a just transition.
Deepening the twinning of the digital and green transitions:
the digitalisation
of our society and the green transition are happening concurrently and are intimately
related. However, their interactions need to be better understood and exploited.
Strategic foresight will explore how emerging technologies can make the most of
both transitions, how they relate to each other, and how, for instance, the
environmental impact of the digital transition can be reduced. It will also explore the
skills required to exploit the technologies of the future, the ways in which AI can be
deployed to transform our digital economy and facilitate the green transition, and
the associated impacts on European actors and value chains. In addition, it will
analyse ways in which investment in strategic projects, including as part of the
recovery, can benefit both the green and digital transitions.
41