Europaudvalget 2020-21
EUU Alm.del Bilag 284
Offentligt
2331244_0001.png
Contribution ID: 44625d98-5e28-47ad-8faa-bf330314f7a0
Date: 03/02/2021 11:51:30
Public consultation on the review of the
European long-term investment funds (ELTIF)
regulatory framework
Fields marked with * are mandatory.
Introduction
The
short version
of this consultation is also available in
German
and
French.
Die
kurze Version
dieser öffentlichen Konsultation ist auch auf
Englisch
und
Französisch
verfügbar.
La
version courte
de cette consultation est également disponible en
allemand
et en
anglais.
Disclaimer
This public consultation is a working document of the Commission services for consultation and does not
prejudge the final decision that the Commission may take.
The views reflected on this consultation paper provide an identification on the approach the Commission
services may take but do not constitute a final policy position or a formal proposal by the European
Commission.
1. Background of this public consultation
Regulation (EU) 2015/760 on European long-term investment funds (ELTIF)
is a pan-European framework for
Alternative Investment Funds (AIFs)
1
that invest in longer term real economy investments such as social and
infrastructure projects, real estate and SMEs. ELTIFs can serve as important conduits of investments to support the
capi
tal markets union,
the
European green deal
and the
digital single market.
The ELTIF regime is intended to facilitate investment in these assets by pension funds, insurance companies,
professional and retail investors providing an alternative non-banking source of finance. Such long-term finance is
critical to enabling the development of the European economy on the path of smart, sustainable and inclusive growth,
while supporting job creation and improving overall economic competitiveness and resilience to systemic shocks. The
1
EUU, Alm.del - 2020-21 - Bilag 284: Notat samt høringssvar vedr. Europæiske langsigtede investeringsfonde (ELTIF’ere)
2331244_0002.png
ELTIF Regulation lays down uniform rules on the authorisation, investment policies and operating conditions of EU
AIFs and marketed in the Union as ELTIFs. ELTIFs may also, under certain conditions, be marketed to retail investors
under a pan-European passport.
Since the adoption of the ELTIF legal framework in April 2015, only a small number of ELTIFs have launched with a
relatively small amount of net assets under management (total AuM below EUR 2 billion). There are currently
approximately 27 ELTIFs in the EU, while only 22 ELTIFs are estimated to being marketed and a number of Member
States have no domestic ELTIFs. The failure of the ELTIF market to develop as expected highlights the need to
complete a review of the regulation to better understand the reasons behind the low uptake and develop policy options
to improve the attractiveness of the ELTIF regime. By reviewing the legal and policy elements of the ELTIF framework,
the Commission aims to enhance attractiveness of the ELTIF legal framework for long-term investment projects,
increase the number of ELTIF funds and overall investment in the real economy.
In June 2020, the
High Level Forum on the Capital Markets Union (HLF)
has made a set of specific recommendations
calling for a review of the ELTIF Regulation broadening the scope of eligible assets and reducing potential barriers to
investment. The Commission is currently assessing the HLF’s recommendations as part of the ELTIF review and the
C
MU action plan.
Under Article 37 of the ELTIF Regulation, the Commission is required to review the framework and submit a report to
the co-legislators assessing the contribution of the ELTIF Regulation and of ELTIFs to the development of the capital
markets union and smart, sustainable and inclusive economic growth. If deemed necessary, the report will be
accompanied by a legislative proposal.
2. High-Level
Forum’s
recommendations for the review of the ELTIF regime
Since the publication of the
first capital markets union (CMU) action plan in 2015,
many actions were taken to develop
adequate sources of long-term funding. The CMU is built on the understanding that it will enable EU companies to
access more stable and long-term financing. Tackling the climate crisis and managing the energy transition to a low
carbon economy, as well as other environmental and social challenges requires a real long-term horizon and long-term
investments. The success of investments in new technologies and infrastructures requires effective regulatory
frameworks, robust and cost-effective financial structures.
Furthermore, financing for projects such as transport infrastructure, sustainable energy generation or distribution, social
infrastructure (housing or hospitals), the roll-out of new technologies and systems that reduce the use of resources and
energy, or the further growth of SMEs, can be scarce. As the financial crisis has shown, complementing bank financing
with a wider variety of financing sources that better mobilise capital markets could help tackle financing gaps. ELTIFs
can play a crucial role in this respect, and can also mobilise capital by attracting retail and third-country investors.
In June 2020, the
High Level Forum on the CMU issued a number of recommendations for the review of the ELTIF
Regulation
by both amending and/or adding new provisions to the existing legal framework, such as reducing barriers
to investments and broadening the scope of eligible assets and investments.
The Commission has committed to conducting an impact assessment of the ELTIF regime that will explore whether
targeted amendments to the legislation can deliver a more proportionate regulatory environment and facilitate the
improvement of the ELTIF framework. The objective of this process is to improve the effectiveness of the regulatory
regime for ELTIFs and their managers, alleviate the administrative burden where possible while ensuring that ELTIFs
are the fund structure of choice for channelling funding to long-term investment projects, while maintaining adequate
investor protection safeguards.
This public consultation will support the policy work of the Commission services in assessing the ELTIF regulatory
framework and preparing policy proposals in this area. The Commission services are committed to comprehensively
evaluating the functioning of the ELTIF regulatory framework and exploring options to tailor and, where appropriate,
amend the provisions of the ELTIF Regulation and the implementing EU legislation.
2
EUU, Alm.del - 2020-21 - Bilag 284: Notat samt høringssvar vedr. Europæiske langsigtede investeringsfonde (ELTIF’ere)
2331244_0003.png
This public consultation will also contribute to the Report of the European Commission to the European Parliament and
the Council pertaining to the functioning of the ELTIF Regulation and fulfil the legal mandate set out in Article 37 of the
ELTIF Regulation.
3. Responding to this consultation and follow up to the consultation
In this context and in line with the
better regulation principles,
the Commission will launch an open public consultation to
gather evidence and stakeholders’ feedback on the challenges, barriers and opportunities for improvements to the
ELTIF regulatory framework.
While responding to the regulatory barriers and regulatory opportunities, two principles should be kept in mind. First,
the review of regulatory issues in the ELTIF regime should not undermine the effectiveness of its investor protection
safeguards. Second, while the focus of this public consultation is on the evaluation and the intended improvement of
the ELTIF regime, this public consultation will also take into account the parallel consultations and/or review processes,
irrespective of the timing, of the other EU financial acquis, such as that of the AIFMD and the MiFID II/MiFIR.
In order to collect further evidence, the Commission is seeking for views on the main reasons behind the slow uptake in
ELTIFs across the Union, as well as reasoned and numerically supported suggestions for an improved functioning of
the ELTIF regime.
The consultation will allow stakeholders to either respond to the short version of the questionnaire comprising general
questions on the ELTIF framework, or a the full version of the questionnaire comprising both general and targeted
questions on the operation of the ELTIF regime.
Interested parties are invited to provide feedback on the questions raised in this online questionnaire.
Views are welcome from anyone.
If you are representing Member States, national competent authorities and/or ESMA, market participants, such as asset
managers, investment firms, credit institutions, financial intermediaries, stock exchanges, institutional and retail
investors, consumer and investor organisations, manufacturers and distributors of financial products and services,
financial and legal advisers or other services providers, as well as academics and policy think-tanks, you are kindly
requested to disclose your affiliation below.
We invite you to add any documents and/or data that you would deem useful to your replies at the end of this
questionnaire, and
only through the questionnaire.
Please explain your responses and, as far as possible, illustrate them with concrete examples and substantiate them
numerically with supporting data and empiric evidence. Where appropriate, provide specific operational suggestions to
questions raised. This will allow further analytical elaboration.
You are not required to answer every questions and you may respond to only those questions that you deem the most
relevant.
You are requested to read the
privacy statement attached to this consultation
for information on how your personal data
and contribution will be dealt with.
1
In the context of the
public consultation on the functioning of the Directive 2011/61/EU on alternative investment fund managers
(AIFMD),
it should be clarified that this public consultation on
Regulation (EU) 2015/760 on European long-term investment funds
(ELTIF)
should be considered as a separate workstream. Stakeholders are hereby invited to provide any ELTIF regime specific
feedback and/or data within the remits of this consultation.
3
EUU, Alm.del - 2020-21 - Bilag 284: Notat samt høringssvar vedr. Europæiske langsigtede investeringsfonde (ELTIF’ere)
2331244_0004.png
Please note:
In order to ensure a fair and transparent consultation process
only responses received through our
online questionnaire will be taken into account
and included in the report summarising the responses. Should you
have a problem completing this questionnaire or if you require particular assistance, please contact
fisma-eltif-public-
[email protected].
More information on
this consultation
the consultation document
investment funds
the protection of personal data regime for this consultation
About you
*
Language
of my contribution
Bulgarian
Croatian
Czech
Danish
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
French
Gaelic
German
Greek
Hungarian
Italian
Latvian
Lithuanian
Maltese
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
4
EUU, Alm.del - 2020-21 - Bilag 284: Notat samt høringssvar vedr. Europæiske langsigtede investeringsfonde (ELTIF’ere)
2331244_0005.png
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swedish
*
I
am giving my contribution as
Academic/research
institution
Business association
Company/business
organisation
Consumer organisation
Non-governmental
organisation (NGO)
Environmental organisation
Non-EU citizen
EU citizen
Public
authority
Trade union
Other
*
First
name
Vicki Erfurt
*
Surname
LARSEN
*
Email
(this won't be published)
[email protected]
*
Scope
International
Local
National
Regional
*
Organisation
name
255 character(s) maximum
Danish Ministry of Industry, Business and Financial Affairs
5
EUU, Alm.del - 2020-21 - Bilag 284: Notat samt høringssvar vedr. Europæiske langsigtede investeringsfonde (ELTIF’ere)
2331244_0006.png
*
Organisation
size
Micro (1 to 9 employees)
Small (10 to 49 employees)
Medium (50 to 249 employees)
Large (250 or more)
Transparency register number
255 character(s) maximum
Check if your organisation is on the
transparency register.
It's a voluntary database for organisations seeking to
influence EU decision-making.
*
Country
of origin
Please add your country of origin, or that of your organisation.
Afghanistan
Åland Islands
Albania
Djibouti
Dominica
Dominican
Republic
Ecuador
Egypt
El Salvador
Equatorial
Guinea
Eritrea
Estonia
Eswatini
Ethiopia
Falkland Islands
Faroe Islands
Libya
Liechtenstein
Lithuania
Saint Martin
Saint Pierre
and Miquelon
Saint Vincent
and the
Grenadines
Samoa
San Marino
São Tomé and
Príncipe
Saudi Arabia
Senegal
Serbia
Seychelles
Sierra Leone
Singapore
Sint Maarten
6
Algeria
American
Samoa
Andorra
Angola
Anguilla
Antarctica
Antigua and
Barbuda
Argentina
Armenia
Aruba
Luxembourg
Macau
Madagascar
Malawi
Malaysia
Maldives
Mali
Malta
Marshall
Islands
Martinique
EUU, Alm.del - 2020-21 - Bilag 284: Notat samt høringssvar vedr. Europæiske langsigtede investeringsfonde (ELTIF’ere)
2331244_0007.png
Australia
Austria
Azerbaijan
Bahamas
Bahrain
Bangladesh
Fiji
Finland
France
French Guiana
French
Polynesia
French
Southern and
Antarctic Lands
Mauritania
Mauritius
Mayotte
Mexico
Micronesia
Moldova
Slovakia
Slovenia
Solomon
Islands
Somalia
South Africa
South Georgia
and the South
Sandwich
Islands
Barbados
Belarus
Belgium
Belize
Benin
Bermuda
Bhutan
Bolivia
Bonaire Saint
Eustatius and
Saba
Bosnia and
Herzegovina
Botswana
Bouvet Island
Brazil
British Indian
Ocean Territory
British Virgin
Islands
Brunei
Gabon
Georgia
Germany
Ghana
Gibraltar
Greece
Greenland
Grenada
Guadeloupe
Monaco
Mongolia
Montenegro
Montserrat
Morocco
Mozambique
Myanmar
/Burma
Namibia
Nauru
South Korea
South Sudan
Spain
Sri Lanka
Sudan
Suriname
Svalbard and
Jan Mayen
Sweden
Switzerland
Guam
Guatemala
Guernsey
Guinea
Guinea-Bissau
Guyana
Haiti
Nepal
Netherlands
New Caledonia
New Zealand
Nicaragua
Niger
Nigeria
Syria
Taiwan
Tajikistan
Tanzania
Thailand
The Gambia
Timor-Leste
7
EUU, Alm.del - 2020-21 - Bilag 284: Notat samt høringssvar vedr. Europæiske langsigtede investeringsfonde (ELTIF’ere)
2331244_0008.png
Bulgaria
Heard Island
and McDonald
Islands
Niue
Togo
Burkina Faso
Burundi
Cambodia
Cameroon
Canada
Cape Verde
Cayman Islands
Central African
Republic
Chad
Chile
China
Christmas
Island
Clipperton
Cocos (Keeling)
Islands
Colombia
Comoros
Congo
Cook Islands
Costa Rica
Côte
d’Ivoire
Croatia
Honduras
Hong Kong
Hungary
Iceland
India
Indonesia
Iran
Iraq
Ireland
Isle of Man
Israel
Italy
Jamaica
Japan
Norfolk Island
Northern
Mariana Islands
North Korea
North
Macedonia
Norway
Oman
Pakistan
Palau
Palestine
Panama
Papua New
Guinea
Paraguay
Peru
Philippines
Tokelau
Tonga
Trinidad and
Tobago
Tunisia
Turkey
Turkmenistan
Turks and
Caicos Islands
Tuvalu
Uganda
Ukraine
United Arab
Emirates
United
Kingdom
United States
United States
Minor Outlying
Islands
Jersey
Jordan
Kazakhstan
Kenya
Kiribati
Kosovo
Kuwait
Pitcairn Islands
Poland
Portugal
Puerto Rico
Qatar
Réunion
Romania
Uruguay
US Virgin
Islands
Uzbekistan
Vanuatu
Vatican City
Venezuela
Vietnam
8
EUU, Alm.del - 2020-21 - Bilag 284: Notat samt høringssvar vedr. Europæiske langsigtede investeringsfonde (ELTIF’ere)
2331244_0009.png
Cuba
Curaçao
Cyprus
Czechia
Kyrgyzstan
Laos
Latvia
Lebanon
Russia
Rwanda
Saint
Barthélemy
Saint Helena
Ascension and
Tristan da
Cunha
Wallis and
Futuna
Western
Sahara
Yemen
Zambia
Democratic
Republic of the
Congo
Denmark
*
Which
Lesotho
Saint Kitts and
Nevis
Zimbabwe
Liberia
Saint Lucia
of the following fields of activities or sectors best describe yourself / your
organisation (if applicable):
at least 1 choice(s)
Asset manager (e.g. fund manager, hedge funds, private equity funds,
venture capital funds, money market funds)
Investment bank
Independent research provider
Sell-side firm
Buy-side entity
Corporate
Issuer
Institutional investor
Retail/private investor
Consumer association
Accounting firm
Auditing firm
Credit rating agency
Other
*
Please
specify your activity field(s) or sector(s):
9
EUU, Alm.del - 2020-21 - Bilag 284: Notat samt høringssvar vedr. Europæiske langsigtede investeringsfonde (ELTIF’ere)
2331244_0010.png
Regulatory and supervisory
*
Publication
privacy settings
The Commission will publish the responses to this public consultation. You can choose whether you would like
your details to be made public or to remain anonymous.
Anonymous
Only your type of respondent, country of origin and contribution will be
published. All other personal details (name, organisation name and size,
transparency register number) will not be published.
Public
Your personal details (name, organisation name and size, transparency
register number, country of origin) will be published with your contribution.
I agree with the
personal data protection provisions
Choose your questionnaire
*
Please
indicate whether you wish to respond to the short version
(6 questions) or full version (42 questions) of the questionnaire.
The short version only covers the general aspects of the ELTIF regime.
The full version comprises 36 additional questions addressing
technic al
more
features .
Note that only the questions that are part of the short version are also
available in French and German.
I want to respond only to the
short version of the
questionnaire
(6 questions)
I want to respond to the
full version of the
questionnaire
(42 questions)
1. Introductory questions
10
EUU, Alm.del - 2020-21 - Bilag 284: Notat samt høringssvar vedr. Europæiske langsigtede investeringsfonde (ELTIF’ere)
2331244_0011.png
11
EUU, Alm.del - 2020-21 - Bilag 284: Notat samt høringssvar vedr. Europæiske langsigtede investeringsfonde (ELTIF’ere)
2331244_0012.png
Question 1. Please specify to what extent you agree with the statements below?
Don't
1
(fully
disagree)
2
(somewhat
disagree)
3
(neutral)
4
(somewhat
agree)
5
(fully
agree)
know -
No
opinion -
Not
applicable
The ELTIF framework has been successful in achieving its
objective of raising and channelling capital towards European long-
term investments in the real economy
The scope of the ELTIF authorisation is appropriate
The costs of launching and operating an ELTIF, and the regulatory
and administrative burdens are appropriate
The ELTIF regime is relevant to the needs and challenges in EU
asset management
The existing ELTIF regime is consistent with the CMU objectives
The ELTIF regime has brought added value to investors in and the
financing of long-term projects
The ELTIF investor protection framework is appropriate
12
EUU, Alm.del - 2020-21 - Bilag 284: Notat samt høringssvar vedr. Europæiske langsigtede investeringsfonde (ELTIF’ere)
2331244_0013.png
Question 1.1 Please explain your position on your responses to question 1,
providing key arguments to support your answers:
5000 character(s) maximum
including spaces and line breaks, i.e. stricter than the MS Word characters counting method.
Limited progress has been made to establish European long-term investment funds
(“ELTIFs”)
as a major
source for financing long term projects and as an established investment product for retail investors. Only a
small number of ELTIFs have launched with a relatively small amount of net assets under management.
There are currently no ELTIFs in Denmark and the Danish market participants seem to not recognise ELTIFs
as relevant within the current regulation.
Market participants in Denmark do not find ELTIFs attractive, not from the supply side nor from the demand
side, and as a consequence the product has not gained widespread popularity.
Denmark finds it important that any product marketed to retail investors should have strong investor
protection safeguards at the same level as there is in MiFID.
Denmark would like to question whether retail investors generally have a sufficiently long investment horizon
for illiquid infrastructure investments or sufficient savings to make infrastructure investments part of a
balanced portfolio.
However, this is not the case for investments made from pension funds. We therefore believe that ELTIFs
are mostly suited for retail investors as part of a balanced pension portfolio.
It should in this regard be noted that many Danish pension schemes offer the saver to be able to put
together its own portfolio within certain limits.
13
EUU, Alm.del - 2020-21 - Bilag 284: Notat samt høringssvar vedr. Europæiske langsigtede investeringsfonde (ELTIF’ere)
2331244_0014.png
Question 2. Please indicate the areas and provisions in the ELTIF regime where policy action would be most
needed to improve the functioning of the ELTIF regulatory framework? Please rate as follows:
1
(no policy
action
needed)
2
(policy
action
could be
considered)
3
(policy
action
desirable)
4
(policy
action
needed)
5
(policy
action
very
strongly
needed)
Don't
know -
No
opinion -
Not
applicable
General princinples and definitions used in the ELTIF Regulation
Market capitalisation threshold defining an SME equity or debt
issuer
Authorisation requirements
Operational conditions
Passportability of ELTIFs
Rules pertaining to eligible investments
Clarification and/or practical guidance on the eligibility
requirements, notably in relation to investments in real assets
Rules pertaining to the prohibition to undertake certain activities
Rules concerning the qualifying portfolio undertakings
14
EUU, Alm.del - 2020-21 - Bilag 284: Notat samt høringssvar vedr. Europæiske langsigtede investeringsfonde (ELTIF’ere)
2331244_0015.png
Conflict of interests related rules, including the ban on co-
investment
Portfolio composition and diversification rules and their application
Concentration limits
Rules and limitations related to the borrowing of cash
Redemption related rules and life-cycle of ELTIFs
Rules concerning the disposal of ELTIF assets
Transparency requirements
Prospectus-related provisions
Cost disclosure related rules
Rules pertaining to the facilities available to investors for making
subscriptions
Requirements concerning the marketing and distribution of ELTIFs
to investors
Specific provisions concerning the depositary of an ELTIF
marketed to retail investors
Provisions and rules pertaining to the marketing of ELTIFs to retail
investors
15
EUU, Alm.del - 2020-21 - Bilag 284: Notat samt høringssvar vedr. Europæiske langsigtede investeringsfonde (ELTIF’ere)
2331244_0016.png
Provisions integrating the EU Taxonomy for sustainable activities
into the ELTIF framework
Inconsistent or duplicative application of the ELTIF related
requirements by Member States
Issues arising from the supervisory practices within Member
Cross-border marketing related challenges
Excessive reliance on distribution networks to market ELTIFs
Excessive costs of setting up and operating ELTIFs
Competition from existing national fund structures
Taxation related issues
Other aspects
States
16
EUU, Alm.del - 2020-21 - Bilag 284: Notat samt høringssvar vedr. Europæiske langsigtede investeringsfonde (ELTIF’ere)
2331244_0017.png
Question 2.1 Please explain your position on your answer to question 2,
providing your arguments, and where appropriate, concrete examples and
data to support your answers:
5000 character(s) maximum
including spaces and line breaks, i.e. stricter than the MS Word characters counting method.
Alternative Investment Funds (“AIFs”) as defined in the AIFMD are currently the primary vehicle for illiquid
infrastructure investments. AIF’s are most often not suited for retail investors.
If ELTIFs are to compete with AIFs as the chosen vehicle for illiquid infrastructure investments, the ELTIF
regulation should be flexible enough to be able to cover a wide range of strategies and investor types and it
should be possible to manage ELTIFs commercially.
Retail investors could be targeted indirectly via investments from pension funds.
The ELTIF regulation would further benefit from a clarification on the assets that an ELTIF can invest into.
17
EUU, Alm.del - 2020-21 - Bilag 284: Notat samt høringssvar vedr. Europæiske langsigtede investeringsfonde (ELTIF’ere)
2331244_0018.png
Question 3. Please rate the following characteristics of the ELTIF framework based on how positive or negative
their impact is, as follows:
Don't
-2
significant
negative
impact
Broad scope of eligible assets under the ELTIF regime
Long-term and illiquid nature of the investments of an ELTIF
Operational conditions
Transparency requirements
Availability of ELTIFs to retail investors
Requirements and safeguards for marketing of ELTIFs to retail
investors
Validity of an authorisation as an ELTIF for all Member States
Other aspects
-1
negative
impact
0
no impact
1
positive
impact
2
significant
positive
impact
know -
No
opinion -
Not
applicable
18
EUU, Alm.del - 2020-21 - Bilag 284: Notat samt høringssvar vedr. Europæiske langsigtede investeringsfonde (ELTIF’ere)
2331244_0019.png
Question 3.1 Please explain your position on your answer to question 3,
providing your arguments, and where appropriate, concrete examples and
data to support your answers:
5000 character(s) maximum
including spaces and line breaks, i.e. stricter than the MS Word characters counting method.
Investing directly in long-term illiquid assets requires a long-term commitment from the investor.
This is especially the case if no secondary market exists. Few retail investors have the commitment and
patience for such long-term investments.
The product is not suited for the vast majority of retail investors. The Danish FSA is of the opinion that ELTIF
could however be part of a balanced pension portfolio. See our answer to question 1.1 above.
Also, retail investors who wish to get exposure to infrastructure may invest in listed infrastructure companies
that are more suited for the needs of retail investors.
ELTIF seems currently to be unattractive. This could be (amongst other reasons) due to the cost and
complexity involved in marketing towards re-tail investors.
2. Scope of the ELTIF authorisation and process
Question 4. Is the scope of the ELTIF authorisation and operating conditions
a p p r o p r i a t e ?
Please explain your answer.
5000 character(s) maximum
including spaces and line breaks, i.e. stricter than the MS Word characters counting method.
No opinion
19
EUU, Alm.del - 2020-21 - Bilag 284: Notat samt høringssvar vedr. Europæiske langsigtede investeringsfonde (ELTIF’ere)
2331244_0020.png
Question 5. Should the ELTIF framework be amended to enhance the use of
the ELTIF passport?
Yes
No
Other
Don’t know / no opinion / not relevant
Question 5.1 Please explain your answer to question 5:
5000 character(s) maximum
including spaces and line breaks, i.e. stricter than the MS Word characters counting method.
N/A
3. Investment universe, eligible assets and qualifying
portfolio undertakings
20
EUU, Alm.del - 2020-21 - Bilag 284: Notat samt høringssvar vedr. Europæiske langsigtede investeringsfonde (ELTIF’ere)
2331244_0021.png
Question 6. Should any of the following investments be eligible under the revised ELTIF framework? Please rate
as follows:
-2
investments
should be
strongly
discouraged
Investments in innovative technologies
Investments in green, sustainable and/or climate related projects
Investments in projects that classify as sustainable under the EU
taxonomy for sustainable activities
Post-COVID 19 recovery related projects
Any financial assets with long-term maturities
Investments in digital assets and infrastructure
Investments in social infrastructure and social cohesion
Investments in energy infrastructure and energy efficiency
Any real estate assets, including commercial and residential real
estate without a perceived economic or social benefit under the
Union's energy, regional and cohesion policies
-1
investments
should be
discouraged
0
no impact
1
investments
should be
encouraged
2
investments
should be
strongly
encouraged
Don't
know -
No
opinion -
Not
applicable
21
EUU, Alm.del - 2020-21 - Bilag 284: Notat samt høringssvar vedr. Europæiske langsigtede investeringsfonde (ELTIF’ere)
2331244_0022.png
The scope of the investment universe of ELTIFs and eligible
assets as currently set out in the ELTIF Regulation be further
expanded to other areas and asset classes
The scope of the investment universe of ELTIFs and eligible
assets as currently set out in the ELTIF Regulation be more
restricted or limited to a narrower set of assets/investments
Other types of assets and investment targets, and/or other
regulatory approaches should be pursued
22
EUU, Alm.del - 2020-21 - Bilag 284: Notat samt høringssvar vedr. Europæiske langsigtede investeringsfonde (ELTIF’ere)
2331244_0023.png
Question 6.1 Please explain your position on your responses to question 6,
including the benefits and disadvantages as well as potential costs thereof,
w h er e
p o s s i b l e .
In particular, please indicate if you consider that any changes in the ELTIF
regime are necessary, and if so which ones, and why? Should you be of the
opinion that investments in certain eligible assets be strongly encouraged,
please provide further details on the possible definitions and scope of such
different assets (e.g. references to existing or new legal definitions,
examples, etc.):
5000 character(s) maximum
including spaces and line breaks, i.e. stricter than the MS Word characters counting method.
N/A
Question 7. Should some of the definitions related to the investment universe
of ELTIFs and eligible assets used in the ELTIF Regulation, such as “long-
term”, “capital”, “social benefit”, “debt”, “sustainable”, “energy, regional and
cohesion policies” and “speculative investments” be revised to enhance the
clarity and certainty around the application of the ELTIF regime?
If so, how should those definitions be amended and why?
5000 character(s) maximum
including spaces and line breaks, i.e. stricter than the MS Word characters counting method.
23
EUU, Alm.del - 2020-21 - Bilag 284: Notat samt høringssvar vedr. Europæiske langsigtede investeringsfonde (ELTIF’ere)
2331244_0024.png
No opinion
Question 8. Is the ELTIF framework appropriate in respect of the provisions
related to investments in third countries?
Yes
No
Don’t know / no opinion / not relevant
Question
8.1
Please
explain
your
answer
to
question 8.
In particular, please describe in detail any necessary adjustments to enhance
legal certainty, for instance, with respect to the proportion invested in EU
Member States with a view to benefit the ELTIF market, their managers and
the broader European economy.
5000 character(s) maximum
including spaces and line breaks, i.e. stricter than the MS Word characters counting method.
N/A
24
EUU, Alm.del - 2020-21 - Bilag 284: Notat samt høringssvar vedr. Europæiske langsigtede investeringsfonde (ELTIF’ere)
2331244_0025.png
Question 9. Which provisions and requirements related to the eligibility of investments and investment assets set
out in the ELTIF Regulation should be updated to improve the functioning of the ELTIF framework? Please rate as
follows:
1
(no policy
action
needed)
2
(policy
action
could be
considered)
3
(policy
action
desirable)
4
(policy
action
needed)
5
(policy
action
very
strongly
needed)
Don't
know -
No
opinion -
Not
applicable
A size requirement of at least EUR 10 000 000 for eligible real
assets investments
A condition for an exposure to real estate through a direct holding
or indirect holding through qualifying portfolio undertakings of
individual real assets
Limitation on eligible investment assets to units or shares of
ELTIFs, EuVECAs and EuSEFs, as opposed to other potential
fund categories
Inability to invest in a “financial undertaking”
EUR 500 000 000 market capitalisation threshold set out in the
ELTIF Regulation for investing in listed issuers
Rules related to investments in third-country undertakings
25
EUU, Alm.del - 2020-21 - Bilag 284: Notat samt høringssvar vedr. Europæiske langsigtede investeringsfonde (ELTIF’ere)
2331244_0026.png
Other conditions and requirements related to eligible investment
assets and qualifying portfolio undertakings
26
EUU, Alm.del - 2020-21 - Bilag 284: Notat samt høringssvar vedr. Europæiske langsigtede investeringsfonde (ELTIF’ere)
2331244_0027.png
Question 9.1 Please provide your assessment of the adequacy and
effectiveness of the ELTIF framework with respect to the execution of fund-of-
fund investment strategies, real assets investment strategies and any
restrictions on investments in other funds throughout the
ELTIF’s
life.
Please explain and provide your suggestions which specific provisions of the
ELTIF Regulation may benefit from improvements, and why:
5000 character(s) maximum
including spaces and line breaks, i.e. stricter than the MS Word characters counting method.
N/A
4. Types of investors and effective investor protection
Question 10. Please describe key barriers to the development of the ELTIF
market, whether regulatory or of another nature, if any, to institutional
investments that you consider reduce the attractiveness of the ELTIFs for
institutional
Please explain:
5000 character(s) maximum
investors?
including spaces and line breaks, i.e. stricter than the MS Word characters counting method.
No opinion
27
EUU, Alm.del - 2020-21 - Bilag 284: Notat samt høringssvar vedr. Europæiske langsigtede investeringsfonde (ELTIF’ere)
2331244_0028.png
Question 11. Should any of the following provisions of the ELTIF legal framework be amended, and
if so how, to improve the participation and access of retail investors to
ELTIFs?
Please explain which of the following provisions should be amended and give specific examples
where possible and explain the benefits and disadvantages of your suggested approach, as well as
potential effects and costs of the proposed changes.
a) Amendment of the size of the initial minimum amount for retail investors,
and net worth requirements
Yes
No
Don’t know / no opinion / not relevant
Please explain your answer to question 11.a, as well as your suggested
approach if you responded yes:
5000 character(s) maximum
including spaces and line breaks, i.e. stricter than the MS Word characters counting method.
N/A
b) Amendment of the specific requirements concerning the distribution of
ELTIFs to retail investors (suitability test)
Yes
No
Don’t know / no opinion / not relevant
Please explain your answer to question 11.b, as well as your suggested
approach if you responded yes:
5000 character(s) maximum
including spaces and line breaks, i.e. stricter than the MS Word characters counting method.
28
EUU, Alm.del - 2020-21 - Bilag 284: Notat samt høringssvar vedr. Europæiske langsigtede investeringsfonde (ELTIF’ere)
2331244_0029.png
N/A
c) Withdrawal period of two weeks
Yes
No
Don’t know / no opinion / not relevant
d) Possibility to allow more frequent redemptions for retail investors
Yes
No
Don’t know / no opinion / not relevant
Please explain your answer to question 11.d, as well as your suggested
approach if you responded yes:
5000 character(s) maximum
including spaces and line breaks, i.e. stricter than the MS Word characters counting method.
N/A
e) Procedures and arrangements to deal with retail investors complaints
Yes
No
Don’t know / no opinion / not relevant
f) Provisions related to the marketing of ELTIFs
Yes
No
Don’t know / no opinion / not relevant
29
EUU, Alm.del - 2020-21 - Bilag 284: Notat samt høringssvar vedr. Europæiske langsigtede investeringsfonde (ELTIF’ere)
2331244_0030.png
g) Other provisions and requirements related to retail investors
Yes
No
Don’t know / no opinion / not relevant
Question 12. Which safeguards, if any, should be introduced to or removed
from the ELTIF framework to ensure appropriate suitability assessment and
effective investor protection, while considering the specific risk and liquidity
profile of ELTIFs, including sustainability risks, investment time horizon and
risk-adjusted
performance?
Please give examples where possible and present the benefits and
disadvantages of your suggested approach, as well as potential costs of the
change:
5000 character(s) maximum
including spaces and line breaks, i.e. stricter than the MS Word characters counting method.
No opinion.
5. Conflict of interests
Question 13. Are mandatory disclosures under the ELTIF framework
sufficient for investors to make informed investment decisions?
Yes
No
Other
Don’t know / no opinion / not relevant
30
EUU, Alm.del - 2020-21 - Bilag 284: Notat samt høringssvar vedr. Europæiske langsigtede investeringsfonde (ELTIF’ere)
2331244_0031.png
Question 13.1 Please explain your position on your responses to question 13,
including benefits and disadvantages of the potential changes as well as
costs:
5000 character(s) maximum
including spaces and line breaks, i.e. stricter than the MS Word characters counting method.
N/A
Question 14. Which elements of mandatory disclosure requirements, if any,
should
be
tailored
to
the
specific
type
of
investor?
Please explain your position, including benefits and disadvantages of the
potential changes as well as costs:
5000 character(s) maximum
including spaces and line breaks, i.e. stricter than the MS Word characters counting method.
No opinion
Question 15. Are the ELTIF rules on conflicts of interest appropriate and
proportionate?
Yes
No
Other
Don’t know / no opinion / not relevant
31
EUU, Alm.del - 2020-21 - Bilag 284: Notat samt høringssvar vedr. Europæiske langsigtede investeringsfonde (ELTIF’ere)
2331244_0032.png
6. Borrowing of cash and leverage
Question 16. Which of the following policy choices related to the leverage of
the ELTIF funds do you find most appropriate?
Increasing total allowed leverage
Decreasing total allowed leverage
Maintaining the current leverage-related rules set out in the ELTIF regime
intact
Other
Don’t know / no opinion / not relevant
Question 16.1 Please explain your response to question 16 with the
description of the advantages and disadvantages of your proposed
approach, including its implications for ELTIF managers, the performance
and risk and liquidity profile of the fund, the risk-adjusted returns of
investors and the attractiveness of the ELTIF regime:
5000 character(s) maximum
including spaces and line breaks, i.e. stricter than the MS Word characters counting method.
N/A
Question 17. What should be the optimal maximum allowed net leverage
a l l o we d
Please explain:
5000 character(s) maximum
for
E L TIF
f u n d s?
including spaces and line breaks, i.e. stricter than the MS Word characters counting method.
32
EUU, Alm.del - 2020-21 - Bilag 284: Notat samt høringssvar vedr. Europæiske langsigtede investeringsfonde (ELTIF’ere)
2331244_0033.png
No opinion
Question 18. How should regulation of leverage for ELTIFs marketed to retail
investors be different from that of the ELTIFs marketed solely to professional
i n v e s t o r s
?
Which safeguards are particularly relevant and appropriate, and why?
5000 character(s) maximum
including spaces and line breaks, i.e. stricter than the MS Word characters counting method.
No opinion
Question 19. Do the requirements related to the “contracting in the same
currency” as the assets to be acquired with borrowed cash, maturity-related
rules and other limits on the borrowing of cash constitute significant
limitations to the operations and leverage strategy of ELTIFs?
5000 character(s) maximum
including spaces and line breaks, i.e. stricter than the MS Word characters counting method.
33
EUU, Alm.del - 2020-21 - Bilag 284: Notat samt høringssvar vedr. Europæiske langsigtede investeringsfonde (ELTIF’ere)
2331244_0034.png
No opinion
Question 20. Please explain which regulatory safeguards, if any, you deem
appropriate to ensure the effective management of liquidity, subscriptions
and
the
financing
of
assets
in
the
investment portfolio.
In addition, please explain if you consider it appropriate to provide for any
alternative regulatory approach for the borrowing of cash rules specifically
during the ramp-up
period in the ELTIFs’ life:
5000 character(s) maximum
including spaces and line breaks, i.e. stricter than the MS Word characters counting method.
No opinion
7. Rules on portfolio composition and diversification
Question 21. Which of the following policy choices pertaining to the ELTIF
rules on diversification do you consider most appropriate?
Requiring greater diversification
Requiring less diversification
34
EUU, Alm.del - 2020-21 - Bilag 284: Notat samt høringssvar vedr. Europæiske langsigtede investeringsfonde (ELTIF’ere)
2331244_0035.png
Fewer regulatory requirements and more flexibility by ELTIF managers with
respect to portfolio composition and diversification
Maintaining the current rules pertaining to the portfolio composition and
diversification set out in the ELTIF regime intact
Other
Question 21.1 Please explain your response to question 21 with the
description of the advantages and drawbacks of your preferred policy
a p p r o a c h .
In particular, should you consider that the diversification and portfolio
composition related rules under the ELTIF Regulation need to be amended,
please explain, to what extent and why?
5000 character(s) maximum
including spaces and line breaks, i.e. stricter than the MS Word characters counting method.
N/A
Question 22. Do you consider the minimum threshold of 70% of eligible
assets laid down in Article 13(1) of the ELTIF Regulation to be appropriate?
Yes
No
Other
Don’t know / no opinion / not relevant
Question 22.1 Please explain your position on your response to question 22
by assessing the advantages and drawbacks of your preferred policy option
pertaining to asset diversification rules:
5000 character(s) maximum
including spaces and line breaks, i.e. stricter than the MS Word characters counting method.
35
EUU, Alm.del - 2020-21 - Bilag 284: Notat samt høringssvar vedr. Europæiske langsigtede investeringsfonde (ELTIF’ere)
2331244_0036.png
N/A
8. Redemption rules and life of ELTIFs
Question 23. Please provide a critical assessment of the impacts of the ELTIF
Regulation rules on redemption policy and the life-cycle of ELTIFs, including
the appropriateness of the ELTIF Regulation for the structuring of the ELTIF
funds, taking into account the legitimate interests of the investors and
achieving the stated investment objective of ELTIFs:
5000 character(s) maximum
including spaces and line breaks, i.e. stricter than the MS Word characters counting method.
No opinion
Question 24. If longer-term investments were to be limited only to those with
certain maturities, what threshold might be considered appropriate?
Shorter maturity of between 5 to 10 years
Maturity of 5 years and more
Only investments with a maturity +10 years
Only investments with a maturity + 15 years
Other possible maturity
Don’t know / no opinion / not relevant
Question 24.1 Please explain your answer to question 24:
36
EUU, Alm.del - 2020-21 - Bilag 284: Notat samt høringssvar vedr. Europæiske langsigtede investeringsfonde (ELTIF’ere)
2331244_0037.png
5000 character(s) maximum
including spaces and line breaks, i.e. stricter than the MS Word characters counting method.
N/A
Question 25. If shorter-term investments were allowed to be included into the
portfolio, what proportion of the portfolio should be permitted?
0% to 15%
15% to 30%
Above 30%
Other options
Don’t know / no opinion / not relevant
Question 25.1 Please explain your answer to question 25:
5000 character(s) maximum
including spaces and line breaks, i.e. stricter than the MS Word characters counting method.
We believe that allowing any larger proportion of the portfolio to be allocated to shorter-term investments, i.e.
limit at 30% would result in significantly watering-down the ELTIF-label.
We find that “shorter-term
investments”
may contribute sufficiently to a larger scope of products for the ELTIF thus providing for further
diversification and increased liquidity. However, any such change must take into account the nature and goal
of ELTIFs which is and should continue
to be “long-term
investments".
Question 26. Do you consider that “mid-term” redemption should be allowed?
Yes
No
Other
Don’t know / no opinion / not relevant
Question 26.1 Please explain your position on your responses to question 26
and provide for advantages and disadvantages of your policy choice from the
37
EUU, Alm.del - 2020-21 - Bilag 284: Notat samt høringssvar vedr. Europæiske langsigtede investeringsfonde (ELTIF’ere)
2331244_0038.png
perspective of ELTIF managers, ELTIF liquidity and risk profile, returns of
investors, and other regulatory aspects:
5000 character(s) maximum
including spaces and line breaks, i.e. stricter than the MS Word characters counting method.
N/A
Question 27. Do you consider it appropriate to allow for regular redemptions
or an “evergreen” vehicle approach (no maturity)?
Yes
No
Other
Don’t know / no opinion / not
relevant
Question 27.1 How frequent should ELTIF redemptions be, and if so, which
additional safeguards would you consider necessary to cater for the
illiquidity, redemptions and other fund cycle related aspects of the ELTIF
framework?
5000 character(s) maximum
including spaces and line breaks, i.e. stricter than the MS Word characters counting method.
N/A
Question 28. Is it appropriate to provide for any alternative regulatory
approach with respect to the redemption rules or portfolio composition,
diversification rules, etc. for ELTIFs during the ramp-up
period in the ELTIFs’
life-cycle?
38
EUU, Alm.del - 2020-21 - Bilag 284: Notat samt høringssvar vedr. Europæiske langsigtede investeringsfonde (ELTIF’ere)
2331244_0039.png
Yes
No
Other
Don’t know / no opinion / not relevant
Question 28.1 Please explain your position and provide for advantages and
disadvantages of your policy choice:
5000 character(s) maximum
including spaces and line breaks, i.e. stricter than the MS Word characters counting method.
N/A
9. Secondary market and issuance of new units or shares
Question 29. Are the provisions of the ELTIF Regulation pertaining to the
admission to the secondary market and the publication of “periodical
reports” clear and appropriate?
5000 character(s) maximum
including spaces and line breaks, i.e. stricter than the MS Word characters counting method.
No opinion
39
EUU, Alm.del - 2020-21 - Bilag 284: Notat samt høringssvar vedr. Europæiske langsigtede investeringsfonde (ELTIF’ere)
2331244_0040.png
Question 30. Are the limitations of the ELTIF Regulation regarding the
issuance of the new units or shares at a price below their net asset value
without a prior offering of those units or shares at that price to existing
investors clear and appropriate?
5000 character(s) maximum
including spaces and line breaks, i.e. stricter than the MS Word characters counting method.
No opinion
Question 31. Should the provisions in the ELTIF framework related to the
issuance of new units or shares be amended, and if so how?
5000 character(s) maximum
including spaces and line breaks, i.e. stricter than the MS Word characters counting method.
No opinion
10. Marketing strategy for ELTIFs and distribution related
aspects
Question 32. What are the key limitations stemming from the ELTIF
framework that you consider reduce the attractiveness of the ELTIF fund
40
EUU, Alm.del - 2020-21 - Bilag 284: Notat samt høringssvar vedr. Europæiske langsigtede investeringsfonde (ELTIF’ere)
2331244_0041.png
structure or the cross-border marketing and distribution of ELTIFs across the
U
n
i
o
n
?
Please explain:
5000 character(s) maximum
including spaces and line breaks, i.e. stricter than the MS Word characters counting method.
No opinion
Question 33. Do you consider that review of the ELTIF rules related to the
equal treatment of investors is warranted?
Yes
No
Other
Don’t know / no opinion / not relevant
Question 33.1 Please explain your position on your answer to question 33:
5000 character(s) maximum
including spaces and line breaks, i.e. stricter than the MS Word characters counting method.
N/A
Question 34. Is it necessary to clarify the ELTIF framework with regard to the
application of the principle of equal treatment of investors at the level of
41
EUU, Alm.del - 2020-21 - Bilag 284: Notat samt høringssvar vedr. Europæiske langsigtede investeringsfonde (ELTIF’ere)
2331244_0042.png
individual share classes, and any other specific arrangements for individual i
nvestors/group
of
investors?
If possible, please provide a specific suggestion:
5000 character(s) maximum
including spaces and line breaks, i.e. stricter than the MS Word characters counting method.
No opinion
11. Miscellaneous
Question 35. Is the effectiveness of the ELTIF framework impaired by national
legislation or existing market practices? Please provide any examples you
may have of
“goldplating”
or wrong application of the EU acquis.
Please explain:
5000 character(s) maximum
including spaces and line breaks, i.e. stricter than the MS Word characters counting method.
No opinion
42
EUU, Alm.del - 2020-21 - Bilag 284: Notat samt høringssvar vedr. Europæiske langsigtede investeringsfonde (ELTIF’ere)
2331244_0043.png
Question 36. Are you aware of any national practices or local facility
requirements for ELTIF managers or distributors of ELTIFs that require a
local presence or otherwise prevent the marketing of ELTIFs on a cross-
b o r d e r
Please explain and provide specific examples:
5000 character(s) maximum
b a s i s ?
including spaces and line breaks, i.e. stricter than the MS Word characters counting method.
N/A
Question 37. Which features of the current ELTIF framework, if any, should
be defined in more detail and which should be left to contractual
a r r a n g e m e n t s ?
Please explain:
5000 character(s) maximum
including spaces and line breaks, i.e. stricter than the MS Word characters counting method.
No opinion
43
EUU, Alm.del - 2020-21 - Bilag 284: Notat samt høringssvar vedr. Europæiske langsigtede investeringsfonde (ELTIF’ere)
2331244_0044.png
Question 38. Which specific provisions in the ELTIF framework could be
amended, and how, in order to lower costs and reduce compliance,
administrative or other burdens in a manner that would not lead to an
increase in material risks from the perspective of effective supervision or
investor protection?
5000 character(s) maximum
including spaces and line breaks, i.e. stricter than the MS Word characters counting method.
No opinion
Question 39. Please elaborate on whether and to what extent the current
ELTIF regime is appropriate for the AIFMs falling under Article 3(2) of
Directive
2011/61/EU
to
have
an
incentive
to
market
ELTIFs.
Please explain:
5000 character(s) maximum
including spaces and line breaks, i.e. stricter than the MS Word characters counting method.
No opinion
44
EUU, Alm.del - 2020-21 - Bilag 284: Notat samt høringssvar vedr. Europæiske langsigtede investeringsfonde (ELTIF’ere)
2331244_0045.png
Question 40. Please provide examples of any national taxation regimes
towards long-term investment funds that are either discriminatory or that you
deem materially reduce the relative attractiveness of the ELTIF framework vis-
à-vis other (national) fund vehicles, also taking into account the interaction
with foreign tax systems? Please provide specific examples of such cases:
5000 character(s) maximum
including spaces and line breaks, i.e. stricter than the MS Word characters counting method.
No opinion
Question 41. You are kindly invited to make additional comments on this
consultation if you consider that some areas have not been adequately
covered. Please elaborate, more specifically, which amendments of the ELTIF
framework could be beneficial in providing additional clarity and practical
guidance in facilitating the pursuit of the ELTIF strategy. Please include
examples and evidence on any issues, including those not explicitly covered
by the questions raised in this public consultation:
5000 character(s) maximum
including spaces and line breaks, i.e. stricter than the MS Word characters counting method.
We noted that in the longer version of the questionnaire it was not possible to include answers to questions 4-
6. Therefore we enclose in an attachment at the end responses to the questions 4 and 5 (replicated below for
ease of reference)
Question 4. Which provisions and requirements pertaining to the eligibility of investments and investment
assets set out in the ELTIF Regulation need to be updated to improve the functioning of the ELTIF
framework? (rating)
Question 5. Should any of the following provisions of the ELTIF legal framework be amended, and if so how,
to improve the participation and access of retail investors to
ELTIFs?
45
EUU, Alm.del - 2020-21 - Bilag 284: Notat samt høringssvar vedr. Europæiske langsigtede investeringsfonde (ELTIF’ere)
2331244_0046.png
Question 42. Would you be willing to provide additional clarifications or
follow-up input upon a direct request from the Commission services?
Yes
No
Under certain conditions
Question 42.1 Please specify under which conditions you would be willing to
provide additional clarifications or follow-up input upon a direct request from
the Commission services:
5000 character(s) maximum
including spaces and line breaks, i.e. stricter than the MS Word characters counting method.
N/A
Additional information
Should you wish to provide additional information (e.g. a position paper,
report) or raise specific points not covered by the questionnaire, you can
upload your additional document(s) here:
The maximum file size is 1 MB.
You can upload several files.
Only files of the type pdf,txt,doc,docx,odt,rtf are allowed
16be825b-6cbe-4ce9-9634-1c87076fe043/2020-eltif-review-consultation-
document_en_DK_addtional_answers_to_short_version_Q4-6.pdf
be8a7c91-0f7d-4f01-b5ed-d38bfcb83c56/Note_to_Commissioner.pdf
Useful links
More on this consultation (https://ec.europa.eu/info/publications/finance-consultations-2020-eltif-review_en)
Consultation document (https://ec.europa.eu/info/files/2020-eltif-review-consultation-document_en)
More on investment funds (https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-euro/growth-and-investment/investment-
funds_en)
46
EUU, Alm.del - 2020-21 - Bilag 284: Notat samt høringssvar vedr. Europæiske langsigtede investeringsfonde (ELTIF’ere)
2331244_0047.png
Specific privacy statement (https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/better-regulation/specific-privacy-statement_en)
More on the Transparency register (http://ec.europa.eu/transparencyregister/public/homePage.do?locale=en)
Contact
[email protected]
47